Anything is possible. Do you realize and acknowledge your own potential? If you do, and have been wondering how you can reach your goals, increase your awareness of the world around you, and help others along the way, then I welcome you to ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com.

This is the place to take comfort in the fact that we are all a work in progress, and that we should never stop learning. As we constantly redefine who we are and what we want to be, we often find that others are content with the comfortable nature of their seemingly normal lives. I am not one of these people. I recognize that life is a precious gift to be enjoyed, honored, and cherished, and I am attempting to help others to realize this same understanding within their own lives. This is a place for me to post many of my findings, writings, and approaches to life that have made it all worthwhile.

Despite the chaos of our world, we can learn to overcome how we react to it, so that we can pursue a more harmonious relationship to all things, all people, and all concepts. Eventually everyone has something of value to offer, but the problem is that too many are set in their ways, and to be honest most people don't really communicate with one another. They are too busy attempting to promote their own agendas rather than finding and pursuing the greater unfolding Good.--RB

"Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." Sir Oliver Lodge

This is a wonderful supplement to the source materials found in...

Principia Geometrica [1] - Quantum Mechanics.pdf

Tetryonics For Dummies.pdf An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Electric field permittivity has a 2pi (rhombic) field geometry while magnetic field permeability is always the result of two separate equilateral magnetic fields that form a magnetic dipole moment.

Where two or more rhombic electric fields interact a Coulombic –charge force of interaction results.

Where two or more equilateral magnetic fields interact a Gaussian-Ampere forces of interaction results. [*opposite fields attract - same fields repel*]...

Principia Geometrica [1] - Quantum Mechanics.pdf

Tetryonics For Dummies.pdf An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Electric field permittivity has a 2pi (rhombic) field geometry while magnetic field permeability is always the result of two separate equilateral magnetic fields that form a magnetic dipole moment.

Where two or more rhombic electric fields interact a Coulombic –charge force of interaction results.

Where two or more equilateral magnetic fields interact a Gaussian-Ampere forces of interaction results. [*opposite fields attract - same fields repel*]

The classical model of the unidirectional electrostatic force fields of point charged particles is corrected to show a bidirectional arrangement of equilateral Planck energy momenta geometries within the electrostatic field that creates the bi-directional forces of charge interactions.

*Where two similar coupled equilateral energy momenta fields combine an electrostatic field is created.*

*Where two opposite coupled equilateral energy momenta fields combine a magnetic dipole is created.*

The arrangement and asymmetry of Planck quantum charges with in any EM field determines the motion and acceleration of charged particles within the field of electrostatic force.

The classical forces of attraction should be renamed forces of interaction (as they result from bidirectional quantum vector forces).

All electromagnetic fields are comprised of a squared number of equilateral Planck energy momenta quanta (whose asymmetrical distribution of equilateral Planck quanta results in a net divergent Force) with a convergent vector force component.

When modeled with equilateral Planck geometries electromagnetic fields follow the Biot-Savart Law:

Rhombic electric fields follow the inverse squared law of propagation

Equilateral magnetic fields follow the inverse squared law of propagation

Magnetic dipole fields follow an inverse cubed law of propagation

The equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum creates chirality at the quantum level in physics (rotation does not affect the charge of plank quanta, but mirroring and/or spatial coordinate translations do).

All positive charged fields can be modeled as having a clockwise inductive flux geometry. All negative charged fields can be modeled as having an anti-clockwise inductive flux geometry (with OMEGA representing equilateral geometries per second and PI reflecting their scalar areas).

All W bosons are comprised of an odd number of equilateral Planck quanta in a trapezoidal geometry.

All Z bosons are comprised of an even number of equilateral Planck quanta in a dual-trapezoidal geometry (neutral Z bosons are equivalent in terms of Planck mass energy momenta to photons save their net geometry).

*All charged fascia [Higgs bosons] are comprised of squared numbers of equilateral Planck quanta in an equilateral geometry.*

The odd quanta Z bosons within electromagnetic fields form quantum levels of charged mass-energy momenta.

The Planck equation [E=n.hv] of quantised energy is a generalized equation of Planck geometries (and applies to all energy momenta arrangements equally).

Bosons and Quantum levels are a transverse measure of mass energy momenta in EM fields.

Photons are a longitudinal measure of mass energy momenta within the same electromagnetic fields.

**Equilateral Planck energy momenta per second [E/c^2] equates to mass geometries.**

**Equilateral Planck energies momenta per second squared [E/c^4] equates to Matter topologies.**

Interactive **mass energy geometries** can combine via the weak force to form standing wave Matter topologies.

Standing wave **Matter topologies** can combine via the strong force to form elementary subatomic particles.

The fundamental Matter quantum of all physics is the Tetryon (a tetrahedral mass-energy Matter topology) which is formed from photons of electrostatic energy and can be found as positive, neutral or negative charges topologies.

These three forms of charged Tetryons form the foundation of all the physical Matter of our universe as they seek a state of equilibrium, Tetryons are not spherical point charges – they are tetrahedral, likewise the subatomic particles they form are not spherical point charges - they are [T] - Tetryonic charge topologies.

The Tetryonic topologies created by Tetryons as they combine to form elementary particles creates new forms of closed volume topologies that follow Euler’s characteristic [V+F-E = 2] for Platonic solids.

**Quarks and leptons are comprised of 12 charged mass energy geometries
- quarks form [8π] octahedral Matter topologies
- leptons form [12π] dodecahedral Matter topologies.**

...and...

- forming [20π] Icosahedral Matter topologies

-------------------------------

-----------------------------

------------------------------

Rest lepton topologies have a completely neutralized magnetic dipole structure and all leptons (charged or neutral) have identical physical Matter topologies.

Their rest masses are the result of the number of plank quanta comprising each Matter topology with applied forces creating additional asymmetrical KEM fields resulting in kinetic energies, magnetic moments and vector velocities of motion.

As the energies of motion are added to equilateral KEM fields the Planck quanta themselves are physically WAVE-length Lorentz contracted.

Matter topologies are Lorentz invariant to velocity changes (or acceleration) The relativistic distortion of spherical point charges in physics is no longer applicable, in turn undermining a basic tenet of special relativity as postulated by Albert Einstein.

These secondary KEM fields of motion also contain the kinetic EM energies and vector [square root] linear momentum of material particles in motion - the mass energy momenta density and physical geometries of Matter topologies is unaffected by applied forces or changes to velocity-momenta.

The changing Lorentz contracted mass energies of kinetic EM fields contributes to the total relativistic mass energy of Matter topologies but in no way changes the mass energy distribution of the Matter component of particles in motion itself - leading in turn to varying generations of subatomic particles with in the particle families themselves.

The net asymmetric KEM field geometry of each particles in motion is reflective of the charged distribution of the Matter topology of the particle itself.

Mesons are created when quark and anti-quark particles combine via the strong force interaction between their charged fascias to create unique 14 pi Matter topologies. (neutral or charged pions)

These strong interactions between opposite charge fascia of material particles and the resulting Matter topologies are evidence of the fact that Matter-antimatter combinations do not necessarily result in the explosive annihilation of the particles concerned. (in fact the combining of opposite charge quarks is a necessary step in the formation of the baryons)

All Baryons are Matter topologies created from the combination of tri-quark topologies The quark's combine via their opposite charged [Higgs] fascia to create neutral and charged elementary topologies.

Due to this opposite charge interaction the charged distribution of baryonic topologies does not follow the textbook given arrangements of [UUD] & [DDU] instead they are arranged as follows:

Neutrons = DOWN + UP + DOWN

anti-Neutrons = anti-DOWN + anti-UP + anti-DOWN

anti-Protons = anti-UP + anti-DOWN + anti-UP

Protons and neutrons are revealed to have quark arrangements that are mirror symmetries of each other, revealing the neutral charge neutron to have a complementary negative charge arrangement to that of protons.

The increased Planck mass energy contents of various families of quarks facilitates the creation of a huge number of possible Baryon topologies resulting in the particle zoo of subatomic elements created in particle collisions within accelerator experiments - all of these elements can be easily modeled and accounted for using Tetryonic mass-energy Matter topologies.

Additionally, the particles often referred to as gluons within the standard model can be easily accounted for and explained as being neutral Tetryons within Tetryonic theory - where these neutral charge Matter topologies form a neutral Matter dielectric between charged Tetryons to facilitate the strong force interaction and the formation of larger particles.

Neutral Tetryons (gluons) can also form particles in their own right (neutrinos and glue-balls), as can charged Tetryons (charge-ball particles), most of which are short lived.

Tetryonics reveals the previously hidden geometry and topology of electromagnetic fields and subatomic particles and the geometric relationship and interplay between electric permittivity and magnetic permeability within all EM field that results on the speed of light in any medium.

As well as the revealing a geometric source of all physical constants within physics itself, Tetryonic charge geometries show the weak force to be a magnetic dipole [edge] interaction between mass energy geometries and Matter topologies and the strong force to be a charge [fascia] interaction between Matter topologies themselves.

The equilateral [quantised angular momentum] of inductive Planck mass energy geometries within squared [HIGGS] fascia of Matter topologies is what creates inertial properties of Matter at the quantum level.

The strong force between charged parallel Higgs fascia of Matter topologies results in 'hidden' partitions of mass energy with in the Matter topologies of quark's and baryons leading to the inability of mathematics online to accurately model and understand the physics of creating these particles at the quantum level.

Tetryonic charged mass energy geometries allows for the accurate 2D and 3D modeling of all Matter topologies and fields of Force interactions within physics.

It reveals that the deuterium atom [not the hydrogen atom] is the quantum building block of all elementary Matter - the unique charge topology of deuterium (consisting of a proton, neutron and electron) can be related to the electromechanical topology and function of quantum synchronous converters.

These quantum synchronous converters absorb and emit mass energies via the rotating electrons [quantum rotors] bound to the nuclei by way of radiant bosons and photons [heat and light].

The net charge of Deuteron nuclei facilitates their binding together to form helium and larger atoms, while stored mass energy quanta within their Matter topology results in raised quantum grounds states that can all be modeled mathematically using Schrodinger’s wavenumbers.

The simpler geometric charge topology reveals visually how the mass energy content of baryons directly affects the angular momentum and energy levels of photo electrons bound to atomic nuclei, in turn revealing that larger elements be created in two ways - namely by the addition of a neutron to a Hydrogen atom (as classically modeled in modern chemical physics) or through the raising of Planck mass-energy quanta within the deuterium Matter topology itself.

Deuterium nuclei without any bound photo-electrons form quantum batteries with EM mass energies can be stored indefinitely without being released.

These nuclei can be arranged atomically in either a series, parallel or empty parallel configuration each of which affects the ground energy states of the respective nuclei created.

Where photo-electrons (quantum rotors) are attracted and bind to these nuclei (quantum batteries) the stored mass energies can then be released in a controlled manner via spectral line emissions, or energy can be added via spectral line absorption.

As photo-electrons are bound to the deuteron nuclei the energy levels are affected directly by the mass energy levels of the nuclei that they bind to, in turn affecting their KEM field energies.

The square root linear momentum of KEM field energies normally creates a vector motion but in the case of bound electrons this vector motion is turned into an angular motion resulting in electron spin within the nucleus.

The direction of the spin is always reference with respect to the nuclear magnetic moment resulting in up and down electron spins and their associated magnetic dipole moments.

The kinematics of KEM fields provides an easy visual explanation of Newton's 2nd law of motion: namely that deceleration can be seen as the removal of odd number quanta from the squared kinetic energy fields and acceleration can be viewed as the addition of odd numbered quanta to squared kinetic energy fields.

The addition or subtraction of odd numbered Planck quanta from squared energy fields results in changing square root linear momentum for the particles that these fields are associated with - this changing linear momentum over time can be equated to acceleration leading to Newton's formulation of Force = mass x acceleration [F = ma = dp/t = dmv/t].

Using the equilateral geometry of Planck's constant we can now unify classical mechanics with quantum mechanics and reveal the underlying dynamics of relativistic mass energies of motion. (as well is providing an electromechanical explanation of inertia in the physics of Matter in motion)

Newton's vector linear momentum [p=mv] forces are revealed to be the geometric square root of Leibnitz's scalar energies [E/mv^2] with their associated inertial mass being a measure of the scalar energies per second [m=E/v^2]

Linear momentum [mv] is differentiated from vector velocities [v] through the equilateral geometry of energy per second [m] in tetryonics, with the total linear momentum of any EM field or system of particles being the vector some of the square root Planck linear momentum of the quanta in the fields comprising the system.

Once the equilateral field geometry of KEM fields is revealed it is easy to show that the total energy of the field [E=mv^2] is the result of the kinetic energies [1/2Mv^2] plus the magnetic moment [1/2Mv^2] of any material topology in motion.

This in turn allows for a rigid geometric differentiation of quantised angular momentum [Ω] in Planck quanta, the linear momentum [p] of any system and the classical angular momentum [vector rotation about a point] in physics.

These geometric definitions of mass energy momenta in physical systems as portrayed in Tetryonic theory reveal a differing geometric relationship to that commonly portrayed in modern physics [i.e. neutralizing right angled Pythagorean triangles].

Additionally Lorentz corrections factors are restricted to planar 2-D mass energies of KEM fields associated to particles in motion where changes of velocity force result in the addition or subtraction of equilateral Planck quanta from the KEM field geometry resulting in the physical expansion or contraction of Planck geometries within the field.

Tetryonic theory's geometric definition and application of quantised angular momentum with respect to mass energy momenta in physics allows for the physical modeling of mass energy and Matter at all scales of physics and their unification of classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics.

The 'squared' energies of quantum mechanics and statistical distributions of the math associated with quantum mechanics is now revealed in an entirely new light facilitating the macro scale modeling of all hitherto unseen quantum particles and processes.

The geometric relationships between charge, mass geometries and Matter topologies is easily visualized and applied to all physics revealing quantised angular momenta [QAM] to be the hidden variable of Planck's constant [h].

The modeling of quantised angular momentum as an equilateral geometry allows for the elimination of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and Bell's inequality from the foundational tenants of quantum mechanics.

Both the position and momentum of particles and fields can be now modeled at any stage of a system's spatio-temporal development and evolution using these simple equilateral charged geometries of mass energy momenta.

Precise rest mass energies of any Matter topology can be calculated from 1st principles allowing for accurate modeling of all quantum systems and even periodic elements - expanding our knowledge of chemical systems and processes.

The Planck-Compton frequency, de Broglie wavelength, absolute rest mass and charge Matter topology of all periodic elements, compounds and molecules can now be calculated with absolute certainty and precision and can be related back to Avogadro's number for all elements in chemistry.

The exponential energy levels of atomic nuclei and atomic processes of energy release can also now be shown to be the result of an underlying geometric Planck scale geometry inherent to all mass energy Matter within physics.

Einstein's mass energy equivalence formula is shown to be a geometric relationship between measurements of energy per second and inertial mass, combined with Tetryonics new definition of Matter as energy per second squared we can now show that Einstein's famous formulation is an incomplete formulation of the mass-ENERGY-Matter relationship that applying only to specific processes within our physical universe.

The Lorentz corrections on which special relativity is based are shown to be WAVE-length and QAM corrections for the changing physical geometries of scalar mass energies per unit of time in spatial co-ordinate systems (c^2)and that additional time-based dimensional analysis must be taken into account in order to define and differentiate between electromagnetic mass and Matter in physics.

The application of squared (equilateral) geometries to physics in the role of quantised angular momentum has been overlooked since the inception of physics itself, but with the inclusion of this geometry a rigid geometric grammar can now be imposed upon the mathematics of physics leading to the correction of many erroneous mathematical assumptions.

**An exact value from first principles for Planck's constant can be calculated and Avogadro's number can be confirmed and related to the absolute rest mass of hydrogen atoms.**

A geometric representation of Coulomb's charged field interactions and the impedance of free space can also be provided for all physical processes allowing for a fast and accurate visualization of energy mechanics at all scales of physics.

*Tetryonic theory’s equilateral charged mass energy and polyhedral Matter topologies allow for the modeling and differentiation of energy in all its forms within any spatial coordinate system providing a vast improvement over relativity's use of stress energy tensors and non-Euclidean geometries in modeling physical systems.*

All fields and particles can be defined and differentiated in terms of their charged mass energy geometries and Matter topologies respectively and the differentiation of elemental families into their generations can be easily accounted for through the addition of mass energies of motion to secondary KEM fields associated with each particle grouping.

Inertial resistance to force can be modeled and explained through the equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum when viewed as an electromechanical equivalent to an inductive loop of energy.

Electromagnetic inertial mass can now be clearly defined as a measure of the inductive EM energy density of any charged 2D planar Planck geometry in any spatial co-ordinate system of measurement.

3D Matter can now be viewed and modeled as the closed topology created by 2D mass energies through charge interactions in any spatial co-ordinate system of measurement per second squared.

**Additionally physical terms such as 'mass-less' particles are shown to be a misnomer as any field or particle must by definition contain energy per unit of time - and should be more appropriately re-termed Matter-less or weightless particles.**

Tetryonics defines, differentiates, and unifies energy in all its forms (mass, Matter & Force) through the equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum at the quantum level, allowing for the development of a unified field equation that models physics on all scales and reveals a common geometric thread to all the disparate fields of physics that to date have defied unification.

Equilateral (SQUARED) energy fields of Planck quanta comprised of statistical distributions of (ODD) transverse bosons and (EVEN) longitudinal photons account for all the quantum mechanical processes of physics including EM field geometries and material particle topologies and electron spin.

Principle quantum levels [1st Schrodinger wave-numbers] are shown to be the result of the series addition of deuterium nuclei in atomic elements with their resulting energy levels determining the squared energy levels of bound photoelectron KEM fields – in turn forming the foundation of discrete quantum jumps of electrons bound to atomic nuclei.

The bound photo-electron can only transition between allowed squared energy levels permitted by the energy levels of deuterium nuclei to which they are bound and once free from the atomic nuclei the electron can emit or absorbed a continuous spectra of light photons - but while bound to the deuterium nuclei in atoms it can only have specific [squared] KEM energy levels.

The complex, asymmetric tri-quark (9 tetryon) Matter topology of baryons directly affects the magnetic moment of protons and neutrons in motion making them considerably weaker than the symmetric axial Bohr magnetron of electrons in motion.

As the Bohr magneton of photo-electrons is determined by the squared energies of its secondary KEM field confusion has arisen with respect to the allocation of spins to subatomic particles, Tetryonic geometries now correct for this and suggest that the electron historically viewed as a spin 1/2 particle is in fact a spin 3 particle under the formal definitions of spin rotations i.e. rotating at 120° can bring it back to an identical quantum state as the initial state measured].

Again Tetryonic theory and its energy geometries in addition to explaining and correcting electron spins also shows that the term electron spin can now be taken literally when modeled with Tetryonic geometries to provide an accurate description of the origin of magnetic moments for electrons, in turn undermining the foundational postulate of special relativity that these magnetic moments are the result of the distortion of spherical point charges and that relativistic Lorentz contractions apply to Matter topologies.

Dirack's constant, or Planck's reduced constant [h/2π], is revealed to be a measure of the electric permittivity of a relativistic electron's KEM field, and the measurement of the associated magnetic dipole of the same KEM field results in the mistaken concept of 1/2 spins in the measurement of Bohr magnetons.

The magnetic vector created by the Bohr magneton [or KEM field dipole] when measured with respect to the nuclear magneton [Proton magnetic moment] produces either a higher energy [parallel] or lower energy [anti-parallel] state for all atomic nuclei.

It is the arrangement of these parallel or anti-parallel magnetic dipoles within atomic nuclei that determines the exact frequency-wavelength (energy level) of emitted spectral lines with the interaction of a particle’s magnetic dipole moment with external electromagnetic fields creating Lorentz forces.

As electrons and protons have identical quantum Matter topologies [elementary charges] but differing mass energy contents the electron is able to create a much larger secondary KEM field (with associated magnetic dipole moment) for the same velocity [1/2Mv^2].

The energy level differences created by the parallel or anti-parallel spin coupling of electrons with protons or deuterium nuclei within atomic elements creates the hyperfine splitting and Zeemen effects observed and spectral lines.

As the electron is now shown to be a complex non-spherical particle topology when it binds with protons to form hydrogen the unique Matter topology of both the proton and the electron [Hydrogen] create a small but detectable precession in the motion of the spinning electron as compared to that of the motion of the same electron in a deuterium nuclei.

Additionally, as all periodic elements, compounds and molecules are comprised of deuterium nuclei (not hydrogen as currently supposed) the orientation and spin direction of electrons bound within these nuclei results in the diamagnetic and paramagnetic properties of various macro-scale materials.

Tetryonics theory reveals that the mass charge ratio is of particles are measure of the constituent mass energy geometries that go into making the particle's final Matter topology that we observe a measure.

But unlike the current mathematical approach the geometric approach of Tetryonics reveals the hidden mass energy partitions within the Matter topology of all subatomic particles and that particles such as tetryons (the quantum building blocks of all Matter) are in fact hidden within the debris of current collider results.

**4 quantum charge tetryons have the same1/3 partial elementary charge as some quarks, and can be measured as having the same mass charge ratio's as charged leptons such as positrons and electrons in collider experiments.
To be continued [QED, Chemistry, Cosmology, Mathematics, Biology and economic theory] - ABRAHAM [2014]**

]]>

Often described simply as the attractive [or repulsive] vector force experienced at a distance between two or more particles of Matter and mathematically formulated in 1785 a complete and satisfactory explanation of the quantum source of and role of Charge in physics remains stubbornly elusive to all who have sought it , until now…]]>

Often described simply as the attractive [or repulsive] vector force experienced at a distance between two or more particles of Matter and mathematically formulated in 1785 a complete and satisfactory explanation of the quantum source of and role of Charge in physics remains stubbornly elusive to all who have sought it , until now…

Tetryonic theory’s equilateral Planck quanta reveals charge to be an inherent geometric property of electromagnetic energy arising from their quantum field geometries, and while electrical energies themselves are inherently non-polarised the magnetic moments of each side of a Planck quantum quoin each possess a distinct magnetic vector that in turn determines the weak force interactions of fields and particles on all scales of physics.

Ie it is the magnetic vector, not the electric field that determines whether a quantum field of EM energy [a boson or photon] is ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ and in turn the equilateral asymmetry of many combined quantum quoins of EM energy momenta that in turn creates fields of electrostatic and electromagnetic energies that go on to create the charged 3D Matter topologies of the particles of the Standard Model.

CHARGE is a measure of the inherent geometric magnetic dipole moments of all equilateral Planck energy momenta that comprise all the 2d fields, 3D particles and 1d forces of our Universe.

Tetryonic theory’s new geometric model of electromagnetic charge quanta advances our understanding of the quantum source and role of charge in the physics of our Universe in new and exciting ways.

While the Standard Model posits spherical sub-atomic particles Tetryonics reveals quantum charge to be an inherent and essential geometric property of the elementary Platonic topologies of all particles with each particle [charged or neutral] having a distinct number of charged fascia [Higgs bosons] comprising the final topology that makes each and every elementary particle unique.

Special Relativity, developed and advanced as an explanation for the constant velocity of light irrespective of the motion of the source posited that Lorentz corrections applied equally to mass & Matter alike through Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence formula and that the contraction of spherical Matter in motion was the source of magnetic moments and observed emfs in magnet-conductor experiments.

Tetryonics shows that all particles have rigid 3D Matter topologies and that their magnetic moments are the result of the asymmetric distribution of Planck mass-energy quanta [E=hv] in their 2d kEM fields of motion… [Mv^2/c^2] not any physical distortion in their material topologies thus undermining a central and foundational assumption of relativity theory.

This simple and elegant explanation of charge wrt material particle topologies and the associated velocity related magnetic moments of their kEM fields of motion also does away with the virtual particles and infinities of QED that have so long plagued its formulation and reconciliation with experimental results to date… totally removing renormalisation and inherent quantum indeterminacy from its equations and thus restoring deterministic motion and mechanics to physics.

With SR & QED having been corrected from this foundational geometric understanding of EM charge geometries attention can turn back to reconciling the mathematical similarity of Newton’s formula of Gravitation and Coulomb’s formula of Charge interaction – at which point Tetryonic field geometries come to the rescue yet again and show that between any two charged particles two equilateral fields of EM energy momenta exist, reaching out from each particle to create a field of interaction irrespective of time and proportional to the charge topology and motion of each particle respectively…. [Instantaneous interaction-at-a-distance]

Likewise the mass-Matter content of celestial bodies and their GRaviational attraction to each other can be similarly modelled but in this case the extended fields of EM energy and resultant force vectors are based on the strictly attractive vectors forces between the bodies firstly and mathematically formulated from this field geometry secondly…

The end result is an identical mathematical formulation [save the force constants k & G] where one produces an interactive vector force while the other produces a strictly attractive force only…. Irrespective of time.

Einstein, with his concepts of relativistic motion and no differentiation between charge, mass or Matter and a time limited speed of propagation [c] required a different explanation and formulation of gravity in order to account for the observed perihelion of Mercury in its motion about the SUN.

His failure to differentiate 2d mass and 3D Matter from an understanding of the source and role of charge at the quantum level of physics is understandable as quantum theory had yet to be invented at the time he formulated his ideas of relativistic uniform motion [SR] & accelerated motion [GR] leading to his much vaunted formula of mass-energy equivalence [E=mc^2] which completely neglects to define and equate 3D Matter in its formulation [m/c^2=E/c^4=?]. It stands in obvious disagreement with both Newton and Coulomb as to the possibility let alone mechanics of the observed instantaneous action of Gravity over cosmological distances irrespective of time, leading to an exhaustive search for ‘gravity waves’ since GR was released publicly.

Many other well know ‘proofs’ of GR exist such as the ‘bending’ of light near bodies of massive Gravity such as stars and the ‘time dilation’ of photons of EM mass-energy in GPS satellite communications etc. – but all of these ‘tests’ also suffer from the same foundational problem that beset Einstein in the first place – there is no differentiation of and between planar 2d fields of mass-energy momenta and material bodies of 3D Matter.

If science cannot [or will not] define and differentiate between 2d mass & 3D Matter and provide a understanding of the source and mechanics of charged energy over space and time in physics then any explanation developed from such a limited understanding may at best mirror reality but offer no real explanation as to the real mechanics at work in Nature – at least Sir Isaac Newton was honest at his failings in this respect in terms of his mathematical solution.

As always there exists a ‘kernel of truth’ in both formulations but only Tetryonic theory with its charged quantum geometries offers a complete ‘picture’ of the mechanics at work and why the maths formulates the way it does and how two wildly different formulations of universal gravitation can both mirror reality despite the inclusion or exclusion of time as a factor.

NATURE AT HEART IS GEOMETRIC IN FORM – mathematics is simply our human attempt to describe the geometric properties of EM energies at work, energy forms we could never hope to see, until now.

In short Tetryonic theory both explains and unites the maths of classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics through the power of equilateral quantum energy momenta geometries & Matter topologies.

]]>]]>

While Planck formulated his results and equation for spectral line bosons [E=n.hv] Einstein formulated his for photons of energy momenta [E=hf] with both terming their quanta as a 'frequency' of quanta...

Using Tetryonic geometry we can now see that the true relationship and formulation for both is n.hv = E = hf

Where bosons are ODD number equilateral quanta and photons are EVEN numbered quanta of mass-energy momenta.

To continue using the same old equations for spectral lines bosons and EM photons is akin to saying 1 =2 or ODDS equal EVENS.

Tetryonics now reveals Zero Point Energy to be nothing more than a charged boson of mass-energy momenta [a 1/2 wavelength photon], in turn unifying quantum mechanics and special relativity; and that bosons [quantum inductive loops of mass-energy momenta] are the true building blocks of everything in our Universe - energy integers if you like.

Mathematics without geometric grammar produces scientific gibberish.

My gratitude leads to both David and Abraham as this post would not has been possible without them including me in their discourse.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

(Q1) Would you accept the characterization (not criticism) that this theory is another attempt to find a realistic and local interpretation of QM?

A: Of course, but it goes much further than that, by defining quantized angular momentum as an equilateral geometry Tetryonics theory is able to provide a rigid geometric model on which to develop further ideas with respect to physics at the quantum level. Already it has provided me with a rigid model of all subatomic particles and processes that closely matches the standard model as presently accepted (albeit with some rather radical corrections).

]]>

My gratitude leads to both David and Abraham as this post would not has been possible without them including me in their discourse.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

(Q1) Would you accept the characterization (not criticism) that this theory is another attempt to find a realistic and local interpretation of QM?

A: Of course, but it goes much further than that, by defining quantized angular momentum as an equilateral geometry Tetryonics theory is able to provide a rigid geometric model on which to develop further ideas with respect to physics at the quantum level. Already it has provided me with a rigid model of all subatomic particles and processes that closely matches the standard model as presently accepted (albeit with some rather radical corrections). Given that it matches both the observed phenomena and particles contained in the standard model as well as extending the known mathematics with a geometric model I am hopeful that this particular theory has much of merit. Certainly I have applied it to QM, QED, Chemistry and Cosmology with some rather stunning results to date and this alone gives me much encouragement to its potential as a replacement for all the disparate theories that pervade physics at present.

(Q2) You dismiss Heisenberg; I assume you dismiss John Bell as well?

A: Obviously the equilateral geometry of quantized angular momenta in tetryonics theory (as well is square root linear momentum and electromagnetic field geometries) provides me a clear-cut deterministic mechanism for negating Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. It also reveals that the same quantized angular momentum can be viewed as a ‘hidden’ variable within quantum mechanics itself - buried under the guise of Planck’s constant [h]. The equilateral geometry of quantized angular momentum, combined with scalar electromagnetic energies and radial spatial coordinate systems means that unlike Heisenberg’s mathematical approach I can illustrate both the mass energy momenta component of a system under measurement as well as the changing time based measurements of the same system within the same illustration. This has the distinct advantage in that more complex mathematic ideas are relatively easy to illustrate using the geometric relationships between mass energy and momenta of any physical system under study. I would argue that the equilateral geometry of quantized angular momenta is just such a hidden variable as expressed within Bell’s inequality statement and while Bell’s theorem and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle suggest that quantum mechanics is inherently fuzzy or indeterminate. I would argue given the results to date that this certainly need not be the case [and in fact that it is not and such ideas of indeterminacy are mathematical crutches].

(Q3) Uncertainty and non-locality are counter-intuitive theories driven by inexorable mathematical deductions and experimental results; how do you explain those away?

A: Tetryonics theory embraces Planck’s ideal of a quantized, finite building block of energy momenta as the foundation of all our physics and Tetryonics embraces this idea and takes it a step further with a truly geometric approach to quantum mechanics rather than the mathematical approach taken to date by various theorists. I allowed the rigid equilateral geometry of quantized angular momentum to drive the theory and to show what is and is not allowable mathematically in preference to suppositions that rely on an inherent uncertainty. While these approaches have given us much insight over the years from a mathematical perspective you will note that Tetryonics corrects many assumptions that have gained a foothold from this very approach to physics. The rigid equilateral geometries are un-yielding (as are the results produced by them) and while I do not profess to know the full detailed intricacies of many of the mathematical theories presently in sway within physics I would argue I do not need to as a rigid tangible model of fields and particles should be of preference to an abstract mathematical approach. Tetryonics theory restores an intuitive visual approach to physics and at the same time requires a mental re-mapping of established mathematical principles (such as squared numbers, the quantum source and role of charge in physics and the differentiation of mass and Matter at all levels of physics in geometric terms]. This is not to put it at odds with a purely mathematical approach but rather as an enhancement to the mathematics currently employed. As I put it, “if mathematics is the language of science, equilateral geometry is its grammar” - one without the other can in both cases lead to pure gibberish. Of course this could have all gone horribly wrong and I may have wasted years of my life developing a theory that was ultimately flawed or unworkable, but to date after much effort and application, I can honestly say this is not been the case (and in fact I have gained a great deal of insight out of this particular geometric interpretation an approach to physics).

(Q4) It is one thing to build a local, realistic model a la EPR; it is another thing to find ways to devise experiments that predict verifiably different outcomes.

A: Absolutely, in fact throughout the various the books that I’ve produced to date I have pointed out many differing outcomes or results that have been overlooked due to a purely mathematical interpretation of the physical results. One that comes readily to mind is how tetryons (the building blocks of all Matter) can be easily mistaken for Bottoms quark’s and leptons in experimental results and thus overlooked. Challenging and correcting relativity’s basic foundational tenants and its current explanations of physics was not easy either for me as it is obvious what most textbooks teach as the best explanation of physics to date but over time I came to accept the Tetryonic model and what it was telling me. This led to many startling reinterpretations of what had been accepted regarding Lorentz contractions and relativity theory both in the special and generalized cases [obviously leading to a new explanation for universal gravitation]. Even chemistry was not exempt as I had to spend a great deal of time developing the new periodic table and 3D Matter topologies of all elements in order to account for the various established observables. Of course the more I reconcile and advance my own theory the more it differs from established and accepted theories, making it seem even more divergent and fantastical compared to most accepted ideas. But at its heart it still remains a simplistic geometric theory that can be modelled using nothing more than paper templates and sticky tape while offering many tests as to its accuracy in preference to the current CG models.

(Q5) Is the Tetryon a hidden local variable?

A: Insofar as the quantum of Matter you could argue that it is a hidden quantum, but ideas such as preons etc. have already hinted at the existence of such a particle being a possibility long before I developed Tetryonic theory. I would of course argue that the equilateral geometry of quantized angular momentum is in fact the hidden variable in physics as the role it plays leads directly to tetryons and the understanding of the source and role of charge in quantum mechanics. Of course quantized angular momenta is not hidden as such in that it is readily seen in the units for Planck’s constant but the mathematics often reverts to the shorthand form of Planck’s constant [h] in preference to the full dimensional analysis of this unit of action [kg.m^2/s] (And of course KEY to this insight was the discovery of the relationship between equilateral geometries and quantized angular momentum itself)

(Q6) Since the Tetryon mimics leptons, is it permanently undetectable and therefore subject to Occam’s Razor?

A: Although the tetryons can be (and are) hidden in accelerator collision results as having identical mass-charge ratios to quark’s and leptons, a closer examination of Tetryonics theory reveals that even if this is the case there would still be a differing inertial mass to these particles to that of quarks and leptons. That is to say although the tracks would be identical in the collision results IF the particles were intercepted and their kinetic energies measured there would be a distinct discrepancy between the measured inertial masses of an electron and that of tetryons despite them both having identical tracks within the results [likewise for Bottom quarks].

(Q7) Your interpretation of gravity is amazing! But I still don’t understand what happens to the photon in this theory?

A: It is obviously the result of the previous 3 e-Books and years of theory refinement and application. Tetryonic theory shows universal gravitation to be a net force resulting from 3 differing quantum forces [i.e. a convergent force (gravity field) created by Matter topologies and the interactive forces of electromagnetic fields surrounding Matter]. Within this context the photon creates the interactive (bi-directional divergent and convergent) forces of the electromagnetic fields surrounding Matter. It continues to play the same role as expressed within relativity theory but it offers no insight as to the quantum field mechanics of the gravity field created by Matter topologies themselves. You could argue that it still plays a role as a component of vacuum energies in order to create the convergent force of a gravity field when the vacuum energies are displaced by Matter topologies but this vacuum energy photon is of an entirely different magnitude of energy compared to that of the photon normally associated with SR and electromagnetic fields [i.e. 1/10^40] …… leading to your next question

(Q8) Can radiant energies ever really weaken to the level of vacuum energies? (I doubt it.)

A: I would argue that they must - the asymmetrical arrangement of Planck quanta within electromagnetic fields results in the net divergence of energy away from Matter. These energies must continue to radiate out from their source points until they interact with other photons or material objects in their path (all the time subject to the inverse square law). This results in the universe being filled with sea of photons of varying and decreasing energies [wavelengths] that in turn apply an exceedingly small but perceptible convergent force on all Matter topologies that displace them (and always act to the center of these Matter topologies) Space by definition in Tetryonics theory is a spatial coordinate system devoid of energy in any form but within which we measure the changing forms of energy as the basis of physics as we know it. It leads to some interesting philosophical questions about the state of the universe before it was filled with equilateral energies and indeed how or why these energies came to be equilateral in the 1st place but if you take it at face value as Tetryonics theory puts it that empty space is a region devoid of energy at the moment of creation and that all of our universe and its physics is the result of changing equilateral energy quanta over time then over the evolution of our universe electromagnetic energies must always radiate outward and eventually weaken to the point of what we call vacuum energies. Of course there are many galaxies and just as many stars again in our universe all of which are radiating mass energy from the collapse of Matter topologies at their cores out into space, and all these radiated mass energies contribute to the overall vacuum energy density of our universe (which in turn is many times greater than the Matter density of our observable universe).

(Q9) Are you suggesting that we can do away with imaginary numbers?

A: Not at all, in fact imaginary numbers still play an important and significant role in electromagnetic theory (QED). They form the left right axis of propagation for Tesla’s longitudinal electromagnetic energy waveforms as opposed to the up down transverse waveforms of Maxwell’s theory. The imaginary numbers[i] in Euler’s work etc. can in fact be directly related to [j] in electromagnetic and electrical theory. Whereas Tesla’s longitudinal energy momenta waveforms produce a real acceleration of particles due to the co-linear direction of linear momentum wrt the direction of propagation, Maxwell’s transverse waveforms produce an oscillation of charged particles wrt the direction of wave propagation. The inclusion of imaginary numbers in my theory of electromagnetic energy waveforms plays an important role in the unification of Tesla’s work and discoveries into our modern understanding of electromagnetic radiation and provided a key to understanding how stars generate their energies.

(Q10) We can change our understanding of stellar ‘fusion’ but what do we do about the brute fact of radioactivity?

A: ‘Fusion’ is a myth perpetuated by an erroneous misunderstanding of the mechanics of physics at both the quantum and cosmological scales…. And in fact it MUST be changed. As you develop a better and more complete understanding of the role of charge in quantum mechanics and will be better able to differentiate between mass and Matter as they apply to physical processes, you will soon see that the proposed mechanics for fusion are not only incorrect but untenable for many reasons. The current model of atoms is flawed, the current understanding of mass and Matter is flawed and the idea of fusion is based on these incomplete assumptions. Many subtle changes have been introduced into the Tetryonic model in order to account for all observables and what is permitted by the charged geometry of Matter topologies and the role of mass energy contained therein. As you become familiar with these various corrections you will see that the fusion of elements cannot be the process by which stars derive their energy and that there is in fact a simpler process at work which is 200 times more efficient than the postulated fusion mechanism. The current approaches to achieving the fusion of elements on earth are all developed from these erroneous models and consequently by design will be unable to produce such energies on earth, however a simpler approach is at hand and that is what I am working on a present in my practical experiments. The toroidal tokomak approach prevents the collapse of Matter topologies to release energy, while the inertial confinement approach fails to sustain the required pressures and energies for the period required, so my work is to overcome these two deficiencies and to mimic the electromagnetic processes at work in the core of stars. Needless to say when I achieve this will be a major breakthrough for all. Even simpler processes such as cold fusion, which is better termed/called ‘cold fission’ can also lead to serious gains in energy efficiency compared to current technologies. But in order to do so a better model of quantum processes and the charged topology of particles themselves is required. The ultimate solution is to convert harmful, polluting waste Matter [even radiological Matter] into clean, limitless energy for all in a process that can be replicated anywhere on earth by any nation. I hope this is being helpful in answering your questions should you have any more I encourage you to message me and I will endeavour to answer them as succinctly as possible. Obviously there is a lot to cover in Tetryonic theory being a unified theory of physics, what I do hope, is that your initial foray into the theory itself has been enjoyable and eliminating.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Welcome to my Universe...One where determinism [via the rigid geometry of equilateral Planck quanta of energy momenta] rules.

Everything you can make out of these triangles of energy momenta must be possible and form part of the physics of our eternal, dynamically evolving Universe.

But not that which is often supposed in mathematics need not necessarily apply [unless it can be modelled with these charged mass geometries and Matter topologies].

All the measured and modelled outcomes of the purely deterministic arrangements and interactions of Planck geometries gives us all the wonder and majesty we experience in our daily lives [and more].

And like Pascal and many other before him and since who have glimpsed any part of the wheel work of Nature I opt to believe in a [deterministic] GOD

Science and Religion need not be mutually exclusive, but they should both be based on physical evidence. –The former we have all around us, the later I trust I have provided in my work and may it go a small way to enlightening others to the majesty of HIS works.

A deterministic charge geometry that also creates a probabilistic distribution of energy momenta as it evolves and interacts into ever more complex forms over time.

ABRAHAM

]]>Gravity is the pure representation of the null energy space inside of each Tetryon. So Matter is the sum total of all the Tetrahedrons that comprise the body in question. NULL space, meaning absolutely no energy inside the Tetryons ( or a vacuum energy displacement by all Matter Topologies to say it another way ), seeks to equalize and Matter Topologies are then additive/attractive with respect to one another.

But there's more going on...the word gravitational is this notion of gravity combined with the simultaneous forces of the KEM fields surrounding bodies of Matter in Motion. The KEM is a secondary field of force that must be considered. [KEM Kinetic-Electro-Magnetic fields] And then we have the radiating field of the sun itself which is all part of our orbital mechanics...

]]>Gravity is the pure representation of the null energy space inside of each Tetryon. So Matter is the sum total of all the Tetrahedrons that comprise the body in question. NULL space, meaning absolutely no energy inside the Tetryons ( or a vacuum energy displacement by all Matter Topologies to say it another way ), seeks to equalize and Matter Topologies are then additive/attractive with respect to one another.

But there's more going on...the word gravitational is this notion of gravity combined with the simultaneous forces of the KEM fields surrounding bodies of Matter in Motion. The KEM is a secondary field of force that must be considered. [KEM Kinetic-Electro-Magnetic fields] And then we have the radiating field of the sun itself which is all part of our orbital mechanics.

mass-Energy-Matter

It is clear that Matter, radiation and energy all have some kind of a common denominator, and if the transformation of entity A into entity B cannot be accomplished directly, present indications are that it can always be done in an indirect way.

'At present, we imagine all space to be filled by a superposition of fields, each named after an elementary particle—electrons, protons, various kinds of mesons, etc. As new species proliferate, it becomes more and more desirable that future theory, if it resembles the present one at all, should contain but a single field, with the present types of matter corresponding to different modes of excitation of it.' -- David Park

The electron is not a permanent “building block” type of entity, but a particle that can be created or destroyed with relative ease.

The currently popular electrical theory postulates that the atoms are held in contact by the electrical forces of attraction, but this does not eliminate the need for a repulsive force; it merely puts this force inside the atom.

Tetryonics shows us that in the case of Leptons the repulsive Strong force gives all Leptons their unique geometries in deference to the attractive force that produces Quarks from the same foundational charge basis; and it is the tetrahedral geometry [one of the strongest forms known to man] that resists deformation in Matter quanta to give us the solidity of material objects.

We have found that both the proton and the electron can be transformed into radiation simply by contact with their respective antiparticles. “All Matter seems to be a form of radiation.”

Since all units can be transformed into motion in the form of radiation, we might be inclined on first consideration to express the question in this manner: What is there that can exist in a variety of forms and is equivalent to motion?

The answer is revealed in the equilateral geometry of Planck energy in Tetryonic theory, where the equilateral geometry of the same can be directly related to quantised angular momentum [m^2/s]"

Gravity

Newton’s law of universal gravitation is not a defining equation, and cannot be derived from defining equations. It represents an observed relationship.

There is no proof of Einstein’s GR theory (the points that have thus far been adduced in its favour are merely evidence)

And there is something incongruous about the acceptance of Mach’s principle by the same scientific community that is so strongly opposed to Newton’s concept of action at a distance.

The fact is that neither Newton’s theory nor Einstein’s theory tells us anything about the “mechanism” of gravitation. Both take the existence of mass as something that has to be accepted as a given feature of the universe, and both require that we accept the fact that masses gravitate, without any explanation as to how, or why, this takes place. The only significant difference between the two theories, in this respect, is that Newton’s theory gives us no reason why masses gravitate, whereas Einstein’s theory gives us no reason why masses cause the distortion of space that is asserted to be the reason for gravitation. As Feynman sums up the situation, “There is no model of the theory of gravitation today, other than the mathematical form.

Newton derived a mathematical expression for the gravitational effect. Subsequently it was found that the range of application of this expression was limited, and Einstein formulated a new expression that presumably has a more general applicability. Both of these were inductive products; that is, they were based on the mathematical aspects of the results of observation and measurement. Neither of the investigators was able to complete his theory by deriving an interpretation of his mathematics inductively.

Einstein’s General Theory is the only major theoretical step taken since Newton, which can even claim to have any factual backing, and while it achieved widespread acceptance initially, doubt as to whether the claims made on its behalf are justified has been increasing as time goes on.

A factor that has contributed heavily to this increasing scepticism as to the validity of the General Theory is that it seems to have arrived at a dead end. One of the criteria by which we are able to recognize a sound physical theory is the manner in which it fits in with existing knowledge in related fields and sheds new light on phenomena other than, and beyond that for which it was originally constructed.

Newton’s gravitational theory, it is said, is grossly deficient in that it merely assumes the existence of a gravitational force without giving us any explanation of how such a force originates, and Einstein’s work is hailed as a great theoretical advance that provides us with the explanation which Newton was unable to supply.

The idea that one mass can exert an influence on another mass at a distance without the benefit of any connecting medium is philosophically unacceptable to most scientists. Newton himself called it “absurd.”

No one has been able to conceive of a mechanism whereby one mass can exert an influence on another distant mass instantaneously, and hence it is generally assumed by the physicists that there must be some kind of propagation of the gravitational effect at a finite velocity, even though there is not the slightest evidence that this is true.

All astronomical calculations and other computations involving gravitation are made on the assumption that the effect is instantaneous, and so far as we are aware, no inconsistencies result from this procedure.

The word “force” normally suggests some kind of a pull or a push and Einstein’s contention, in essence, is that his explanation attributes the gravitational effect to something that is not in the pull-push category. But Newton did not limit his concept of gravitational force in this manner; in fact, he specifically refused to express any opinion as to the nature of the force.

Einstein accounts for the force (or the equivalent of such a force) by a distortion of the space-time structure, but if we subject this explanation to a critical examination, it becomes obvious that Einstein faces exactly the same problem in accounting for the space-time distortion that Newton does in accounting for the gravitational force.

Relation to mass. The gravitational force between two masses is proportional to the product of the masses involved, and acts in the direction of the line joining the centers of the masses.

Relation to distance. The gravitational force between two masses is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the centers of the masses.

Gravitational constant. The numerical constant in the gravitational equation based on the mass and distance relationships just stated is 6.67×10-8 when expressed as dynes × cm2 × g-2

Velocity of propagation. So far as is known at this time, the effect of gravitation is instantaneous, and in all practical applications of the gravitational equation the calculations are made on this basis, even at galactic distances. Many theories of gravitation, including the Einstein theory, assume a finite velocity of propagation of the gravitational effect, but there is no experimental or observational evidence to support this assumption.

Screening - The gravitational force cannot be screened off or modified in any way by any means now known.

In addition to listing the things that we know about gravitation, as a preliminary to a critical study of the phenomenon, it will be helpful to list some of the things that we do not know, because there is a general tendency to confuse fact with fancy when the consideration of a problem extends over such a long time and involves so much speculation. The speculative hypotheses of a century or half-century ago are likely to have acquired the standing of axioms by this time where they have remained unchallenged in the interim.

Curved space. There is no evidence that space is, or can be, curved or deformed in any way. It is true that Einstein has set up a system wherein some of the characteristics of gravitation are explained on the assumption that space is deformed by the presence of matter, but the phenomena which an assumption was specifically designed to fit cannot be used as proof of the validity of that assumption, and there is no other evidence of an independent character to verify the existence of a deformation of space.

Gravitational fields. There is no evidence that a gravitational field exists in any physical sense. All that we know is that a test particle placed in a particular location experiences a gravitational force due to the proximity of a mass. So far as we have any actual knowledge, the only participants in this phenomenon are the two masses; any theory that calls for an intermediate effect on or by a field, a medium or space itself, is purely speculative.

Mediums. There is no evidence of the existence of a medium of any kind through which gravitational effects could be propagated. Furthermore, there is no evidence that space has the properties of such a medium.

Gravitational units. There is no evidence of the existence of “gravitons” or any such gravitational unit.

Variability with time. There is no evidence that the strength of the gravitational effect has varied or is varying with time.

On the basis of the foregoing, a satisfactory theory of gravitation must produce an explanation of how two masses can exert a force on each other instantaneously, without an intervening medium, and in such a manner that the effects cannot be screened off or modified in any way.

The essence of Newton’s theory is the assumption that a force of attraction exists between each mass and every other mass. But merely assuming the existence of such a force leaves us with two unanswered questions: (1) How does the force originate? and (2) How does it work?

Einstein’s gravitational theory still leaves us in essentially the same position. This theory rests on the assumption that the existence of mass causes a deformation of the space-time structure which, in turn, accounts for the gravitational attraction. Here again we have the same two unanswered questions: (1) How does the deformation originate; that is, what is there about the property of mass that deforms space or space-time? and (2) What is the mechanism of the deformation; that is, how does it operate?

In the case of gravitation, we want to know how the gravitational force, or gravitational effect, originates and how it operates, not only because we have an innate desire for knowledge, but also because we are confident on the basis of past experience that this additional knowledge of the gravitational phenomenon will open the door to further advances in related fields. [Particularly in light of the fact Newton’s formulation for Gravity is mathematically identical to Coulomb’s law for Electric force and yet is equally described in General relativity in a completely different manner]

“To say instead that gravitation is a manifestation of the curvature of four-dimensional geometrical manifolds is to account for a mystery by means of an enigma." -- G. C. McVittie

The radiant energy of an impinging photon may, for instance, can be converted into kinetic energy (heat), or into electrical energy (the photo-electric effect), or into chemical energy (photochemical action). Similarly, any of these other types of energy which may exist at the point of emission of the radiation may be converted into radiation by appropriate processes.

Now let us ask, are these the characteristics of gravitation? The answer must be an unequivocal No!

Gravitational energy, or potential energy, is a measure of energy of position; that is, for any two specific masses, the mutual gravitational energy is determined solely by their spatial separation and the ratio of the mass-energies of their respective Matter.

But energy of position in space cannot be physically propagated in space, it is a potential energy – Tetryonics solves this by revealing the true mechanics of Gravitation [ie Vacuum energy displacement and the KEM fields of Matter itself]

All in all, gravitation and electromagnetic radiation are about as dissimilar as any two physical phenomena can be, and the attempts that have been made to draw conclusions from an assumed analogy between the two are simply meaningless. What should had been done was the recognition of the fact that Gravity and EM radiation are two distinct forces acting in unison at any instant of time and are related through the amount of Matter any system has."

]]>

...with reference to a frictional or pressure gradient, just as Relativity as it went down this track and converted ALL mass and Matter to energy and then described it as a pressure gradient in order to describe gravity as the 'supposedly' - 'bent rubber sheet' of curved space-time...Useful as it allowed us to solve problems and solve things, at the same time it was an explanation without and explanation.

It gave us a way to get an answer without really understanding what is going on. This is what happened in "Quantum Cosmology" when Abraham rationalized and unified....

By the time Abraham rationalized, unified and explained Newton and Coulombs similarities, and then how they related to Einsteins field equations, merged the whole lot to give the unified gravitational field, the answer to Navier Stokes was staring him in the face.

Non-linear simultaneous equations, and field tensors are mathematically complicated...

What Tetryonics does is give us a model that covers it all-at-once in one image...

Space, Time, Energy, momentum, mass and Matter.

This gives us all the forces, everything physical and everything immaterial so in that respect, the one simple basic foundational geometry of Tetryonics can therefor explain this work.

Rather than focusing upon the differential equations, focus on the picture. An image is worth more than a 1000 math words...its the key.

]]>...with reference to a frictional or pressure gradient, just as Relativity as it went down this track and converted ALL mass and Matter to energy and then described it as a pressure gradient in order to describe gravity as the 'supposedly' - 'bent rubber sheet' of curved space-time...Useful as it allowed us to solve problems and solve things, at the same time it was an explanation without and explanation.

It gave us a way to get an answer without really understanding what is going on. This is what happened in "Quantum Cosmology" when Abraham rationalized and unified....

By the time Abraham rationalized, unified and explained Newton and Coulombs similarities, and then how they related to Einsteins field equations, merged the whole lot to give the unified gravitational field, the answer to Navier Stokes was staring him in the face.

Non-linear simultaneous equations, and field tensors are mathematically complicated...

What Tetryonics does is give us a model that covers it all-at-once in one image...

Space, Time, Energy, momentum, mass and Matter.

This gives us all the forces, everything physical and everything immaterial so in that respect, the one simple basic foundational geometry of Tetryonics can therefor explain this work.

Rather than focusing upon the differential equations, focus on the picture. An image is worth more than a 1000 math words...its the key.

Physics is completely missing what is going on here. What is measured as a sin wave of electric fields or magnetic fields, is in fact the result of a 2[pi] equilateral geometry. As they move past the point, any person or detector won't measure the geometries exactly, but rather they will measure the strengths of the E or M field position with respect to one another.

It's the actual motion of the diamond shaped 2[pi] arrangement of photons of energy passing the detectors that resolve to sin waves in this way. You'll notice the 90 degree phase relationship between the E-Field and M-field components.

First, we must wrap our heads around this 2 quanta EM field that is creating these changing values in the sin waves. It's not just wave mechanics, it's actually the measure of the triangles in relationship with one another.

The alternating diamond shape electric fields in the upper left...and the oscillating magnetic dipole fields shown in the upper right.

Traditionally drawn as circles, are really the passing equilateral triangles passing a point. The upper left maps the E-field max, and the upper right shows the M-Field max oscillations.

Tetryonics simply says that -- Scalar energy that makes a force is an Equilateral Triangle... The square root of that triangle represents the linear momentum as indicated by the pink color running up the height of the triangle.

Euler's equations have been known since the 17th century. It combines trig, exponential features, the square root of negative one, basically all the features of mathematics rolled into once equation, and now we have THE understanding that brings all this to life.

We are working to show that the square root of a negative number is not irrational, it's simply the heights of the Negative charged fields of the Triangle...it's a very real value of the negative charge.

e^i[pi] + 1 = 0

Can be rearranged...

e^i[pi] = -1

If this is the case, you have the square root of negative one being expressed, and mathematicians scratch their head at this...Tetryonics simplifies the issue and just says that the Square root is the height of a negatively charged equilateral triangle.

We have this quadrature wave made from the geometric photons and EM wave. The measurement past a point will produce the complex wave form that sinusoidally varies with time, and the 90 degree phase relationship can be easily understood.

We're not saying that the mathematics is wrong, rather that the mechanism/geometry at work has never been identified before. The concept as understood using a 'concentric pattern of radiating ripples' of electromagnetic energy that overlap to give us complex interference patterns and complex interactions of force, is the basis of field mechanics that led to the Navier Stokes solution.

Rather than radiating concentric rings and spherical point particles as the map, we are looking toward the tessellated Planck Quanta back of all the equations.

Tetryonics is a bottom up approach, given the geometry, the math comes out.

Mathematics (top-down) is simply pattern recognition looking down from our perspective down, and our human minds have found it difficult to interpret the math correctly.

There is a misconception to the underlying geometry, and as a species we've missed the equilateral geometry as being of vast important. The Relativity equations as written by Einstein are all the same as Navier Stokes, as in they are all non-linear simultaneous equations.

Relativity was based on Lorentz corrections ( as the velocity increases, wavelengths get shorter ), but was applied incorrectly. Lorentz corrections only apply to the secondary KEM ( Kinetic ElectroMagnetic Fields) that result from Matter in motion. It's not Matter itself that Lorentz contracts, but rather this secondary KEM fields alone!

The energy stored in the KEM fields, which have a kinetic component and a magnetic moment, and any Material object moving at any velocity will have mv^2 quanta in a secondary KEM field. All the Relativistic corrections, the Lorentz, transforms, Special Relativity and General Relative relates to the contraction and motion and geometry of Equilateral Fields of mass-energy.

Matter itself is NOT Lorentz variable. Matter Topology is not affected by the speed, velocity changes or application of force in any way shape or form. All the extra energy of the force goes into these secondary KEM fields. This applies to Navier Stokes. These KEM fields are fields of mass-energy momenta - Fields of Motion - or Kinetic Fields.

If we are going to model fluid dynamics and the pressures and velocities and how the 'wavefront' moves, we must first understand that any force applied to Matter is made up of Equilateral Planck energy momenta that is stored in these fields...not in the Matter itself. We are introducing a secondary component that has yet to be identified. Separate from the mass-Matter of the particle itself.

We can resolve away the mysteries of 'Wave-Particle duality' this with an analogy. If we think of the KEM wave as the wake of a boat in water. As you push the boat away from the dock, the boat does not contract, but the energy of your push goes into the creation of a wake. As the boat speeds up the wake gets bigger, and as the boat slow down (due to friction) the wake gets smaller. KEM waves work in exactly the same way. The stored energy of motion is in this field.

The Matter Topology of the boat does not change, but the energy of your push off the dock, sets up a secondary wake/wave is generated and the dynamics of the wave change as the boat increases it's speed. At no time does the actual Matter of the boat contract at, near or faster than light.

Whatever force you apply will be stored in the KEM field, in both a kinetic and magnetic moment. It will cause the Material particle or boat to move in the vector direction of it's Linear Momentum....(the square root of the energy supplied by that force). If you know the weight of the boat you can divide the momentum by the weight of the boat to derive how fast the boat is moving...and more importantly which direction!

This is the Gaussian Distribution from the Geometric perspective of Tetryonics.

Our next illustration gives you more information directly applicable to Navier Stokes.

If you look at the color coded Photons, they form a Normal/Gaussian Distribution pattern in Tetryonics, they go from, red, orange, yellow, green, aqua, blue, Indigo, violet, --going back down---, Indigo, blue, aqua, green, yellow, orange, and then red. themselves...(this is the color coding representing a 64 square unit Equilateral Triangle with 8 quantum steps...the second image below, shows a Pink Linear Momentum Vector going up the center and it represents 9 quantum levels of 81 Planck Quanta going up the apex of the tessellated triangle arrangement.)

Every Quantum Physicist on the planet is missing this point!

This is where the statistical probabilities come into quantum physics itself. It all comes from this field and this arrangement of energy momenta within a charged geometry. Whether you measure it as mass (energy per second) or if you measure it as an energy density (Tau-a-b as a stress–energy tensor) using General Relativity -- with it's associated square root vector velocity or linear momenta -- it makes no difference--, or you can even measure it as a function of time by watching the change of Equilateral Geometry (Quantised Angular Momentum) per second.

If you do the quick algebra on (Quantised Angular Momenta/per second) you get (square-meters-per-second/c^2).... Do the algebra on it and you get 'Seconds'...Any changing seconds -- or changing angular momenta per c^2 will give you TIME...because you get delta seconds.

Delta Seconds is TIME. Time itself is quantised. It's a measure of QAM (Quantised Angular Momenta) or energy geometries per spacial region...That's the simplest way to put it.

All these energy distributions of energy quanta, the scalar as well as the quantised Planck Quanta and their various aspects of Kinetic energy, linear momenta, magnetic moments, time... all these features including velocity, can only be done in mathematics at present as 'simultaneous non-linear equations' because they are a scalar function. The linear momentum and the vector remain linear, but the rest of them are SCALAR functions.

Even though we can now quantize them using Tetryonic geometry, they are still treated as scalar. You try to solve for them, ( x, y, z) each direction of motion has to be solved with a non-linear simultaneous equation.

Just like gravitational fields, the mathematician looks at it and either has a stroke or shrugs his shoulders. To try and calculate them is a nightmare, but to visualize them in Tetryonics is simple.

You can see the Electric and Magnetic Components, You can see the kinetic components...the entire field is kinetic. You can make out it's linear momentum by the pink diamonds running down the center forming the central height of the triangle. You can see the vector direction that the particle is moving. You can also see how many Planck Quanta are present.

More excitedly from Navier Stokes side of it...you can now bring in Relativity, because as we have stated that the kinetic field is fully relativistic and it's the part that is Lorentz corrected due to velocity changes, we have found that as you add more energy by applying more force, you will put more quanta into that field and those planck quanta being squeezed into the same geometric area, obviously their wavelengths are then contract. As the velocity increases the wavelength of each quanta contracts. The particle itself's wavelength DOES NOT contract, or change.

De Broglie, who extended this to the physical contraction of particles, and Einstein doing the same thing, was COMPLETELY inappropriate. It was a mis interpretation as to what Matter was as opposed to what mass-energy is.

That's where Relativity has erred in it's foundation. The Lorentz contractions, which gave birth to Relativity, DO NOT apply to Matter. They only apply to Matter in so far as the energy of the mass in the Tetrahedral Topologies have a specific Compton frequency and De Broglie wavelength. That part is correct, but it's not Lorentz contracted.

Then you can take it to the final step. The image showing Bosons and Photons...(EM waveforms) shows the Lorentz contractions of bosons, showing the associated energy levels of a photo-electron as it's accelerated.

It shows the physical contraction or changing size of the quanta in the KEM field as the electron is accelerated. Again, a squared number for every KEM field as the energy is applied, so this is where we get Bohr's quantum jumps. Which cause all the problems with asking.

'How do we merge quantum theory in with Classical Mechanics and explain this contraction? How do we do all this in the case of Fluid Dynamics?'

All the particles that are in motion, in say a wavefront, a wave crashing on a beach, or a particle moving through a fluid situation, with resistance and things like that...In a macro scale model, we can do it mathematically, but how can we do it visually using a Macro scale model?

Tetryonics shows us the visual geometry at play, but it also shows exactly how the math was applied incorrectly.

The same KEM fields can be re-drawn showing the same fields, the same energy momenta, but this time we are focusing on the linear momenta, the vector direction created by the energy fields. The more quanta you have provided by the energy supplied by the force, the higher the value of the linear momenta and the higher the value of the associated velocity, in proportion to the mass-Matter, of the particle that that field is associated with.

mass is that lovely constant between force and acceleration. The heavier the particle, the slower the velocity b/c there's more inertia to get moving, so the force will not accelerate it to the same velocity of a lighter particle. mass acts as a fulcrum in the equation.

Any information about any particle in motion can be gleaned from the simple Equilateral geometries of Planck Quanta in a KEM field, as can ALL the information about the charged Matter Topology of any particle.

Using Tetryonics, if we had a computer big enough and coded correctly, we could physically describe each and every atom, all the spare electrons, the energy in the system, the complete makeup for ever type, whether it's a water molecule, or a metal bullet in a water solution, makes no difference, you can model all the physical particles along with their KEM fields for their directions of motion.

Now if it's random, obviously it makes it more complex, but we have super computers capable of meteorologica weather mapping...so why can't we do the same with the Quantum domain, once all these points are taken into account?

If you know enough information, you can predict, not only their exact outcome, but also their exact position, energy, and momenta, for any particle within the system that you are modeling.

What we have been lacking today, is the Equilateral Energy Momenta described as such, and to build the Topologies of the Matter while understanding the mechanics.

If you were to build a model of a one second snap shop of a system, you can put all the particles, with their KEM fields into the model and then progress that like a still shot for another second.

That's all the Navier Stokes equations are doing. They are trying to solve for one instant in time, and then a second later, you allow that system to evolve and take another snap shot. Calculate for their position, charge Topology and the KEM field of every particle in the experiment under question, and then a second later you allow that system to evolve and you take another snap shot with the geometry. Then place a series of 60 of these snap shots together and you have a movie.

Then you have gone from a Navier Stokes type situation, where it's just a black box, to a computer that is actually running the simulation. Then you can test it against physical models to validate Tetryonic Theory.

All the problems resolve down to people having Euler's formula and NS equations, but lack the underlying geometry. They still think of it as circular wavefronts creating interference patterns, when it is these Equilateral Geometries at work. If you shade these as 50% coloring, you can see the super-positioning of these equilateral KEM field overlays. This creates the the force between particles.

In the case of friction, all you have is a substance with it's KEM field that are super positioning with the KEM fields of the other particles in motion, and resisting it's motion, causing the particles to slow down and loose velocity.

Given enough time with these basic geometries that we now have via Tetryonics, we can do what Navier Stokes attempts to do mathematically, but can't do, and that is to solve for a 3D problem.

"Is it solvable?" -- Yes!

"Can any of the fields resolve back down to a singularity point?" -- Yes!

"Does it have the simultaneous equation component?" -- Yes, because there are scalar field geometries.

"Does it have conservation of energy mass and conservation of momentum?"

Yes, from which we can deduce geometrically/visually, the vector component of each particle. Then we just draw the situation, knowing the forces of motion with much greater detail than is possible with vector diagrams or with pure math. It then becomes a simple visual problem. If you want an exact answer you'll have to run the super computer for the length of time required. Allow the particle to interact and there's your solution.

You can prove for a 3D computational fluid dynamic example, an exact outcome for any particle or for the entire system.

You can't prove that using the math, because you can't solve the math. All you can do is manipulate the math and assume there is no vector rotation and that there are only linear motions, so then you can get rid of all your simultaneous scalar parts.

You can do both with Tetryonics. Where there is a vector straight line of linear momentum you know there is an associated Equilateral field of scalar energy surround it.

All these complex parts of the math, like curl, differentiation over time, just vanish and the solution becomes a simply slide show.

Whether the mathematician will accept this geometric approach will depend on how long it takes them to accept the logic behind it.

The complexity of the NS equations that we are so familiar with, simply disappear using the Tetryonic approach. The problem doesn't even exist as many believe that it does.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics offers a strict differentiation between mass and Matter, and we offer clarity between the linear and the non-linear, and even P vs NP type problems that we also resolve using geometry alone.

KEM fields are electromagnetic fields that point in a vector direction. They have linear momentum - the square root - all this applies but Instead of 'circular spherical wave fronts,' we now have equilateral geometry as KING.

]]>The grounding is in the geometry. That's all we use, and the mathematics comes about from the geometric relationships themselves. How could we ground ourselves any better? The rigidity of geometry dictates the math...

"We start at the very basics of physics, which is the Equilateral Triangle and we build everything in the universe from that equilateral triangle. That's all we start with and that's all we use, whereas modern science is built upon our perspective of the universe looking down to the quantum level.

As we can't see it, we've had to make assumptions, we've done measurements and observations, and worked out the math to give us the same answers as what we observe in these experiments without truly understanding what it was that was occurring at that level.

That's what Tetryonics does. It fills in that blank. It says, 'Geometrically, this is what's happening! Give us the math, and it will give us the results!'

Once your brain adjusts with it all, and you become familiar with exactly how these shapes interact and how they look when they flip and rotate, you find that it becomes very quick.

It's like learning another language. Initially, when you are learning it, you are constantly thinking what you want to say in your original language, and then translating it before you speak. Once you have immersed yourself and learned the second language, you don't tend to do that. You just think and speak in the foreign language. That's what's really going on.

I do a lot of physics these days and I don't do the math. If I need the math to prove a point to explain it to somebody, I'll do it, but I can get much quicker answers and do much more detailed work just using the geometry. That's where it applies back into teaching this geometry to children at an early stage.

The quicker you learn it and become familiar with it, the less the established assumptions of modern science will influence you, and the more proficient you will be." -- K.C.A.

Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." -- Sir Oliver Lodge

The grounding is in the geometry. That's all we use, and the mathematics comes about from the geometric relationships themselves. How could we ground ourselves any better? The rigidity of geometry dictates the math...

"We start at the very basics of physics, which is the Equilateral Triangle and we build everything in the universe from that equilateral triangle. That's all we start with and that's all we use, whereas modern science is built upon our perspective of the universe looking down to the quantum level.

As we can't see it, we've had to make assumptions, we've done measurements and observations, and worked out the math to give us the same answers as what we observe in these experiments without truly understanding what it was that was occurring at that level.

That's what Tetryonics does. It fills in that blank. It says, 'Geometrically, this is what's happening! Give us the math, and it will give us the results!'

Once your brain adjusts with it all, and you become familiar with exactly how these shapes interact and how they look when they flip and rotate, you find that it becomes very quick.

It's like learning another language. Initially, when you are learning it, you are constantly thinking what you want to say in your original language, and then translating it before you speak. Once you have immersed yourself and learned the second language, you don't tend to do that. You just think and speak in the foreign language. That's what's really going on.

I do a lot of physics these days and I don't do the math. If I need the math to prove a point to explain it to somebody, I'll do it, but I can get much quicker answers and do much more detailed work just using the geometry. That's where it applies back into teaching this geometry to children at an early stage.

The quicker you learn it and become familiar with it, the less the established assumptions of modern science will influence you, and the more proficient you will be." -- K.C.A.

Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." -- Sir Oliver Lodge

The mathematical exploration of quantum mechanics is hopelessly lost without a rigid definable geometry to guide it. It leads to all sorts of outcomes such as multi-dimensions, black holes, no distinction between mass & Matter etc...

A lot of time was taken up correcting small [but important] 'errors' arising from geometry-less maths. [Maths may the language - but geometry is the Canvas surface on which it is written].

Equilateral Geometry is the foundation of Relativistic Math.

In Tetryonic theory, the circles around Planck triangles are the region of space mapped out by light per unit of time [ie in 1 sec light radiates in 2 directions at c to form a circle with a radius of c, a circumference of pi [2c] and an area of pi[c^2].

You'll find lots of units like c^2, c^3 and c^4 within the maths of physics - only Tetryonic theory reveals what these terms really are [spatial coordinate systems based on the speed of light]

These c^2 [Euclidean], c^3 [Cartesian] and c^4 spherical coordinate systems based on the speed of light are used to geometrically differentiate planar ENERGIES from 2d mass and from 3D Matter in physics, clearing up much of the confusion of the existing mathematics.

ENERGY quanta are a Planck triangle without a circular spatial coordinate surrounding it.

2d MASS is Energy per light second [E/c^2], a triangle with a circle.

3D MATTER is shown as a tetrahedral form of Energy per light second squared [E/c^4].

Just one of the major scientific breakthroughs revealed via Tetryonics is that all Baryon topologies have identical quantum mass-energies [but differing nett elementary charges] thus correcting almost a century of atomic and chemical theory and providing the means to unify Bohr shell/orbitals with Schrodinger quantum numbers to produce the first accurate model of all 120 periodic elements. Tetryonics shows the exquisite detail of the charged Matter topology of all 120 elements showing their energy levels [shells], and position of all electrons [and their spin] - showing how classical Bohr information and Schrodinger numbers 'line' up.

Tetryonic Chemistry offers a new periodic table overthrowing Dmitri Mendeleev's version. Quantum Chemistry offers a detailed schematic for the elements with all their quantum information shown and related to the quantum Matter topologies of the elements, quantum energies, and shells. For the first time ever, this new periodic table actually reflects quantum reality.

We are ushering in an Alchemical Renaissance and although there's really no way to know how or when that will manifest in the world around us in the years to come, the information we are are bringing to light absolutely flies in the face of conventional wisdom and a peer review process is simply a cat and mouse game between the good ol' boys who have their own theoretic models to uphold and defend.

Who among you would be so willing to admit that your life's work could turn to dust overnight and who among you would be open minded to a new theoretical approach to knowledge should the information show up on your desk tomorrow morning?

I venture to say not many. A few thousand emails to mainstream academia sends them straight into the cognitive dissonance that. I've spent 30 months looking at this day in and day out, asking others to take a closer look and seeking to find an 'authoritative' figure in the field to comment. Crickets in return, and no substantial evidence has been brought to my attention in this time that would have me turn away from the Tetryonics explanation of things.

Mostly crickets in return, save a handful of faithful servants of the truth.

Those keen to study Tetryonics are those that have fallen prey to the system of education and erroneous models, but with only a small handful of independent researchers, I am confident that we can accelerate past the rest at light speed.

We can show where the text books are currently wrong, we can correct the underlying errors, assumptions, and mis-interpretations of the current quantum theories in the space, all while reducing the complexity of mathematics down to the simplicity of geometry.

It that doesn't sound like progress, then let's be honest with ourselves, and suggest that perhaps you are not even looking or seeking for the truth to begin with. I've been at this study of physics for about 30 years, and have piled up a large debt attempting to jump through the hoops of university academia, and I've found a free eduction in Tetryonics, that from any angle is an improvement on the current formulations and explanations of physics.

I'm not here to spoil your fun thinking about multiple dimensions, time travel, worm holes, and entangled particles across vast galactic distances, or ruin the mystery, but there is a certain component of this Theory that does in fact remove the mysterious, and helps those with ears to hear, to plant their wisdom in a foundational understanding that is self referential, consistent and that harmoniously unifies the science of our past, thus providing fertile ground to stand and move our civilization towards uncharted waters.

The two benefits of our technology will be the controlled release of mass-energy from Matter, and the safe long term storage of energy as mass in inductive topologies.

We have made great strides in advancing our understanding of the electrical sciences over the past century since these words were written, we have delved deep into the very structure of Matter itself only to find that at the core of our understanding lie roadblocks that stymie our progress in the quest for sustainable sources of energy that mirror the simplistic process found in nature.

At the heart of our current problems in understanding the physics of Nature is our ability to define and differentiate between mass & Matter, even Energy itself on a geometric basis. Until we are able to do so our attempts to mathematical model the process at work on all scales of physics will remain hopelessly abstract and filled with assumptive errors of math born from a top-down approach attempting to understand the physics of immaterial fields and material particles.

A new bottom-up approach has been devised wherein the charged geometry of Planck energy momenta itself resolves the current mathematical impasses into elegant geometric solutions reflective of the true quantum nature and mechanics of energy on all scales of physics.

With these charged 2d planar geometries and 3D topologies we can at last ‘see’ the immaterial quantum world of mass-energies and model in exquisite detail all the field interactions that take place unseen to us and that give rise to nuclear Forces and fields of physical interaction.

The quantised angular momenta [QAM] of Planck’s constant is revealed to be nothing more than a reflection of the planar equilateral geometry inherent to energy momenta at the quantum level, a property that gives rise to new definitions of 2d mass-energy geometries and 3D Matter Topologies; allowing for visual and tactile manipulation of Energy and particles to be conducted for the first time in history.

We can model the formation of particles of Matter from fields of energy momenta and see how charged topologies interact with each other via interactive fields of Force, in turn leading us to new insights into the true nature of physics and a rapidly advancing understanding of the true mechanics of the Universe hinted to us by Tesla and dreamt of by so many ever since.

With an advanced understanding of quantum fields and particle dynamics comes new insights into the charged topology of elements themselves and finally a completely new picture of the forces and processes at work in Stars.

The ‘fusion’ of elements in stars is shown to be no longer the process by which stars liberate energy at their cores. Just as Mendeleev’s periodic table of elements can now be replaced by a far more accurate table modeled on the quantum charge topology of each and every element with its associated quantum numbers and electron configurations, the process by which stars convert Matter into radiant mass-energies can be finally revealed through Tetryonic theory leading us to grasp the physical mechanics at work in the stars and put this knowledge to work for us here on Earth.

QAM = Quantised Angular Momenta [m^2/s]

QAM, which is often mistakenly described as spin, flux, curl in physics and electrical engineering, when it is in fact the equilateral geometry of energy itself, ie Planck's constant [h] = kg.m^2/s = mass.QAM = mass.OMEGA

It is the hitherto 'hidden' foundation geometry that creates everything in our Universe - mass-ENERGY-Matter and the Forces of motion and interaction on all scales.

My hope, as an independent researcher, is to bring together facets of a changing world so that we may pass through the doorways of discovery with the least amount of turbulence.

Growing pains can be awful, but once we are through that phase, a breath of fresh air and opportunity for real and lasting understanding can take hold across the planet.

A Paradigm is a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them. Not everyone shares them where mainstream physics is concerned.

I would agree that a paradigm shift of unlikely proportions is upon us, and I whole heartedly disagree that "the ground moves slowly."

What I'm finding is that there are a group of people moving and advancing our understanding at such a rapid pace, it's unprecedented how quickly things are happening now.

Most of us don’t even know the transition has been made, or that the corner has been turned. I believe that it has.

It is up to us as individuals in all our fields of endeavor to break free of the chains of education, and to use our intelligence to create a better understanding of our Universe.

Geometry rules our Universe not math.

While mathematics is the language of science it remains a language that lacks a well defined physical model on which to test it and further its many and varied solutions to quantum mechanics. it is this lack of any rigid, enforceable geometry [grammar] that has allowed the flourishing of numerous statistical and probabilistic solutions to the physical problems in turn impending our scientific advancement of quantum processes.

Tetryonics offers the world a gift, but so many 'experts' in the field won't even spend 3 minutes with the material before passing judgement, and we all wonder why process is so painstakingly slow. It's heartbreaking in all actuality. Do we want answers, or not?

Humanity has shifted, and all I'm doing is trying to share knowledge. Tetryonics has nothing to sell, only wisdom to share. The lips of wisdom are now closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

]]>

See also Where Tetryonics and the Primer Fields Meet

http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/tetryonics-and-primer-fields

See also Where Tetryonics and the Primer Fields Meet

http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/tetryonics-and-primer-fields

]]>

"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."--K.C.ABRAHAM

Why do I study Tetryonics? To put it simply, I've been on a journey of discovery since about the age of 4. I have an innate curiosity about the world around me, and almost nothing can quench my thirst for a tangible expression of the forces that guide our lives. Tetryonic Theory offers humanity enormous potential for the advancement of physics and technology across the board. Tetryonics originates outside the domain of mainstream science and is therefor immediately dismissed as a valid approach by even the most intelligent people around. This is not about how smart you are, but rather how well you are able to assimilate a new approach into your everyday awareness. It's about setting aside long held notions about our universe, while being open to a more holistic understanding that trumps that of the mainstream preaching.

"If modern science cannot explain the very basics concepts of physics what hope is there that the most advanced explanations of the mechanics of our Universe is right?" -- K.C.ABRAHAM

In my opinion, it's the very science that C.E.R.N. promotes which is the pseudoscience. They are all doing it wrong, and let me tell you why....

]]>"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."--K.C.ABRAHAM

Why do I study Tetryonics? To put it simply, I've been on a journey of discovery since about the age of 4. I have an innate curiosity about the world around me, and almost nothing can quench my thirst for a tangible expression of the forces that guide our lives. Tetryonic Theory offers humanity enormous potential for the advancement of physics and technology across the board. Tetryonics originates outside the domain of mainstream science and is therefor immediately dismissed as a valid approach by even the most intelligent people around. This is not about how smart you are, but rather how well you are able to assimilate a new approach into your everyday awareness. It's about setting aside long held notions about our universe, while being open to a more holistic understanding that trumps that of the mainstream preaching.

"If modern science cannot explain the very basics concepts of physics what hope is there that the most advanced explanations of the mechanics of our Universe is right?" -- K.C.ABRAHAM

In my opinion, it's the very science that C.E.R.N. promotes which is the pseudoscience. They are all doing it wrong, and let me tell you why. Not only are they waisting massive amounts of dollars to peddle their own dogma, but by adding more and more energies into the system, they are adding an unnecessary layer of confusion to their test results. Increasing energy levels is NOT the answer to revealing the subtle secretes of the quantum world. Additionally, increasing the Kinetic energies of collision particles only serves to increase the mass-Energies of the ejecta.

Tetryonics is a fully relativistic unified theory of electromagnetic mass-ENERGY, Matter, and motion, in which the classical properties of inertial mass and quantum mechanical quantised energy momenta are explained as being a direct result of the geometric properties of inductive equilateral energies moving through external electromagnetic fields. These charge geometries show the weak force to be a magnetic dipole [edge] interaction between mass energy geometries and Matter topologies and the strong force to be a charge [fascia] interaction between Matter topologies themselves.

The key to understanding the mechanics of the quantum and uniting it with the dynamics of the Cosmos is through the use of equilateral charged energy geometries. Deep within the data of these collider experiments, the tetryon of Matter is hidden away. We can declare the search for the Higgs boson to be over.

Independently and almost simultaneously in 1964, three groups of physicists proposed the Higgs Mechanism through which the inertial mass properties of Matter are created: Francois Englert and Robert Brout: by Peter Higgs (inspired by the ideas of Philip Anderson); and by Gerald Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and Tom Kibble. The Higgs mechanism was incorporated into modern particle physics by Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam, and is an essential part of the standard model.

As the Universe cooled and the temperature fell below a critical value, an invisible force field called the 'Higgs Field' was formed together with the associated 'Higgs Boson.' The Higgs mechanism is a process by which vector bosons can obtain mass.

The Higgs Field is another name for the Aether, or vacuum energy field that fills free Space. It's interaction with inductive Tetryonic topologies create the inertial properties observed in mass-Matter.

All charged fascia [Higgs bosons] are comprised of squared numbers of equilateral Planck quanta within a larger equilateral geometry. The equilateral Quantised Angular Momentum of inductive Planck mass energy geometries within squared [Higgs] Fascia of Matter Topologies is what creates inertial properties of Matter at the quantum level.

One day soon, the value and validity of Tetryonics will rise to the surface. Demonstrations are already underway, and I can't wait to watch some of these mainstream physicists squirm in their seats. They will be kicking themselves for not remaining as children in their curiosities toward their studies. Rather, they will begin to see the error of their ways, in adopting a cut and paste mentality, only paying lip service to the understanding of those that went before.

"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants." -- Isaac Newton

It is essential that we retrace our steps in order to advance our notions of mass-Energy-Matter. With the implications becoming more and more obvious by the day, I would like to encourage you to move from a mode of extreme skepticism to one of extreme open mindedness. Tetryonics offers a logical progression that anyone can follow, but not everyone can immediately clue into it with a single five minute viewing. It has taken me two full years to even begin to approach this understanding, and I still have thousands of questions and decades of research ahead of me.

I like to call this a billion dollar education because Tetryonics offers a quantum model that not even the most advanced laboratories have been able to identify. C.E.R.N. is laughable, and even if given the opportunity to join their ranks, I wouldn't consider it. I'm walking my own path, and with the insight afforded via Tetryonics, I am more confident than ever that I can progress my knowledge of all systems one day at a time. It takes a diligence of a different variety, however I'm up for this challenge. Are you?

I love how people go straight away to the pseudoscience claim, while not holding their own preferred models up to the same scrutiny. Those that are so willing to call Tetryonics anything other than incredibly consistent, informative, and applicable to modern day observations, can move on to the real pseudoscience that the entire planet is enamored with. If you haven't yet taken a look at the logical progressions Abraham has outlined, and you have not been able to suspend you skepticism, the monumental leap afforded humanity through the Tetryonic perspective will likely remain an ever elusive realization for you.

With that being said, one can step through Tetryonics one page at a time until the ideas sink in a bit. Once they do, you might just have to pull your own foot from your mouth and admit that your knee jerk reactions were just you being a jerk. That's fine, as jerks abound these days. I'm here for educational purposes however, and rather than move toward an argumentative agenda I am willing to help those who truly are looking at this model for what it offers.

If you lack the ability to re-wire your brain a bit, then you're probably better off watching Brian Green videos on youtube, rather than looking at Tetryonics. T-Theory may not be something you can approach. If you are into "black holes, multiverses, string theory, virtual particles, fusion based atomic models, and spherical point charges" you are not on the path to truth. Pure mathematics alone is not sufficient to move us toward greater understanding where these things are concerned.

T-Theory is going to provide me years and years of worthy study to come. What Abraham has discovered is something no one else has yet to identify. If you still don't know what that is, then I can tell that you have not given T-theory an honest look. Let me lend you some assistance, free of charge I might add.

Abraham would say, "If Maths is the language of Physics, equilateral Planck geometry is its grammar."

What is being suggested here is that math can represent a great many things, however without the proper knowledge of the "Grammar" that math must use, our scientific community and mathematicians are not always able to put the math into the proper perspective. This is how strange ideas and abstract concepts end up being part of mainstream science. We are beginning the process of the unveiling, but it is going to take some time. Things like Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle, multiple dimensions, and String Theory have all been abstracted from our erroneous understanding of math.

Without differentiating between the mass-Energies of the Matter Topology, and that of the secondary Kinetic Electromagnet Fields resulting from Matter in motion, we are standing face to face with a dead end in physics. Abraham resolves these quandaries in short order. Tetryonics makes this distinction, and in an eloquent approach, opens a new doorway of discovery for the independent researcher.

Tetryonics, for the first time in history, makes a proper distinction between mass and Matter. It uses a single underlying premise to put our knowledge into the correct perspective. If you are looking for an intuitive way to understand these topics then you have an opportunity to dig deeper as you see fit. The investigation will help you to discern what is real and what is not, what is B.S. and what is not.

It's simply up to you to look at this with an open mind. There are many who can take the mainstream scientific community seriously, but completely lack that same ability when something new and challenging comes to the forefront. It's natural to be skeptical, that's why I've dedicated my self to finding out if Tetryonics is a valid approach to knowledge, and I have found that it is. These new discoveries undermine the entire mainstream understanding, and is therefor a threat to those in control of scientific advancement at large.

If you're happy with modern theory and it's current explanation of the mechanics of our universe, then stick to them, and let's see how far down the rabbit hole you can go. All I can say is that you are likely to be light years behind if you spend much more precious time with those other pseudosciences. I don't have that much time to waist, and feel Tetryonics has offered me a fast track understanding that we liken to a Hubble telescope of the microcosmic universe.

I'm not even close to a genius, yet many high intellectuals have crumbled under the weight that Tetryonics offers. It will bowl you over, slap you up side your head, and knock you straight out if you're not ready for it. I call it a zoom zoom for your IQ. Who doesn't want that?

I have found mainstream science to be a conspiracy of control and half-truths. Science progresses one funeral at a time. New ideas are eventually assimilated, but we are challenging your skepticism. We hope that you can suspend your disbelief for just a moment, and all your questions are welcome. I try my best make myself available to those interested in Tetryonics, and I would be happy to point you all in the right direction. I must note, that I am not the expert here, but a student working each and every day to bring about a new awareness of the quantum processes that guide the mechanics of the universe.

I seek nothing short of an explanation of the mysteries of the universe. Having found them, an entirely new life study has been given to you and I. It's here in the world today. It's there for you to gaze upon and ponder, and it's here to stay. What we as a society decide to do with it will be our most challenging endeavor for any new technology can just as easily be used for evil as it can be for good. Are we going to exploit this knowledge to quicken the pace of the destruction of the planet, or are enough people going to embrace a new Atlantis, bringing a new Earth into manifestation in the here and now?

-------------

Side note: The "dark" side is so appealing for one very simply reason. It's much easier to add chaos, destruction and confusion into any situation, whereas creating harmony, cooperation, and enlightenment, requires a great deal more effort than the former. Consider the following.

An artist spends 60 hours creating a great piece of work, when his five year old son walks into the room with his own markers, and in less than a minute, ruins the art of his father. A false sense of power and authority over his environment will come over the child's understanding because he realizes how much control his destructive desires were able to manipulate the situation, not failing to mention the emotions of this father as well. Not realizing the effort required to bring the piece of art to life, yet quickly finding out how invested his father's emotions are about the entire ordeal, the five year old begins to grasp how to manipulate his environment through these types of behaviors. A very rough example, but I think you get the point I'm making in that it's easier to destroy than to create.

-------------

The path of creation, as opposed to destruction, is a finer balancing act of manifestation across the board. It requires a thoughtful response to ones environment, acknowledging the gifts others have to offer and a willingness to cooperate across the lines of opinions, persuasions, and illusions that we all build up between ourselves and the outside world.

When a team of collaborators can hone in on this balance and bring something new to life, there you have a situation where others will seek to swoop in to create a whirlwind of obstacles to destroy the progress. We must be ever vigilant in our quest to document our findings, our experiences and our aims as to avoid a swift suppression of these enlightening theories and perspectives.

--------------

"There is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about this energy, but that its existence and potential use has been discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or more." – Dr. Theodor C. Loder III

Tetryonics itself has 3 main laws.

1) Energy itself is equilateral.

The 1st Law highlights that Energy itself has an inherent equilateral geometry, [the result of its quantised angular momenta].

2) The law of interaction and all energy in what ever form it is will seek equilibrium.

The 2nd Law states that ENERGY in all its forms [charge, mass, or Matter] seeks equilibrium.

3) Once the system is in motion and it's seeking equilibrium, it will continue indefinitely as it cycles through it's various forms backwards and forwards.

The 3rd Law of Tetryonics just simply highlights that our Universe [and all the physics of mass-ENERGY-Matter in motion] is made up of finite, deterministic eq. Planck quanta.

As a result the appearance of ‘infinity’ in ANY equation of physics must not be taken seriously as it is simply a mathematical way of saying ‘we don’t really know the precise number here but it is big]…. As a result equations in QED etc. must be re-normalised [i.e. have their infinities cancelled out by introducing negative infinities that were never in [or resulted from] the equations to begin with, in order to make sense of the work and GR leads to infinite energy densities at point singularities causing its equations to fail when trying to look a t quantum processes – thus introducing Black holes etc.]

Clearly, mathematical nonsense of this sort has to stop and any unified theory of mass-energy-Matter changing in space over time that covers and unifies QM, QED, Chemistry and Cosmology on all scales of physics using finite, deterministic quanta should NOT have infinities anywhere in them… AT ALL.

Eternity however is a subtly different beast entirely, it describes a never-ending, changing, dynamic system over time and this accurately models our physical Universe where ENERGY in all its forms and expressions is in constant, endless motion as it seeks a state of equilibrium between gravitational Matter and radiant mass-energy momenta.

Tetryonics is a new quantum theory of mass-energy Matter, stemming from a radical reinterpretation of what 'square' numbers are in physics and their application to Quantized Angular Momentum (QAM). It can now be shown through the geometry that the QAM of Planck’s constant is in fact the result of its quantized Equilateral Triangular Geometry, not a vector rotation about a point.

For further reference concerning the Tessellation of Equilateral Geometries, I recommend looking at Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory. He connects these idea up in a purely mathematical way, and goes a long way to showing that Tetryonics is in fact headed in the right direction.

http://www.principlesofnature.net/number_geometry_connections

http://tetryonictheory.com/omega-unit

The equilateral geometry itself gives rise to the physical properties of charge, electrical permittivity, magnetic permeability and the rigid physical relationships between inertial mass-energy and moment in physical systems at the quantum level. Charge(QAM/C2) ,in addition to its role as the geometric source of physical properties, also provides the quantum framework for radiant 2D mass-energies to become 3D standing waves Matter geometries facilitating the development of large scale physical systems of atoms, compounds, stars and galaxies throughout our universe.

Hitherto unexplained and mysterious properties of quantum mechanics are now revealed as having their origin in the geometry of Planck’s constant itself.

We now have the makings of a new visual [geometric] theory of musics underway uniting all three, math, music and the physics of colour.

So many discordant theories all united through equilateral Planck geometries.

We now have the makings of a new visual [geometric] theory of musics underway uniting all three, math, music and the physics of colour.

So many discordant theories all united through equilateral Planck geometries.

By coincidence or not Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680), a well regarded intellectual known to be the last man to know everything, appears to have understood something along the lines of what Kelvin Abraham has been working to extrapolate through his Tetryonics. Discovered independently of course, there may be some additional gems of information available to those seeking more connections in this regard. I'll continue to seek out the writings of Athanasius Kircher and will post any relevant information that may result from a continued investigation.

Quick Update, for what it's worth. I am not sure if this is a pointless exercise or not, but I can't help but be curious when similar images appear in manuscripts of the past. I discovered that the image I posted originates from a book titled "Mundus Subterraneus" and the section where it's found is called "Physico-Mathematica" which I find fascinating in itself. Then, in the section called "De Alchymia Sophistica" I found more equilateral triangles inscribed in circles.( page 311 ). Were these philosophers just stumbling on something or was there more going on below the surface so to speak?

https://archive.org/stream/mundussubterrane02kirc#page/n5/mode/2up

]]>By coincidence or not Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680), a well regarded intellectual known to be the last man to know everything, appears to have understood something along the lines of what Kelvin Abraham has been working to extrapolate through his Tetryonics. Discovered independently of course, there may be some additional gems of information available to those seeking more connections in this regard. I'll continue to seek out the writings of Athanasius Kircher and will post any relevant information that may result from a continued investigation.

Quick Update, for what it's worth. I am not sure if this is a pointless exercise or not, but I can't help but be curious when similar images appear in manuscripts of the past. I discovered that the image I posted originates from a book titled "Mundus Subterraneus" and the section where it's found is called "Physico-Mathematica" which I find fascinating in itself. Then, in the section called "De Alchymia Sophistica" I found more equilateral triangles inscribed in circles.( page 311 ). Were these philosophers just stumbling on something or was there more going on below the surface so to speak?

https://archive.org/stream/mundussubterrane02kirc#page/n5/mode/2up

]]>http://spie.org/Documents/Courses/Education_Outreach/Scholarships/Kyle-Hill-PR14.pdf

This isn't the first time that Tetryonics has received recognition at the university level.

India + 1

Canada + 1

United States = 0 ( Where are you? Don't let the future pass you by... )

A congratulations is in order for Ranjith Reddy and Abhinav Sharma for winning the special research award in recognition of their efforts in bringing Tetryonic theory to new students at Mallareddy Engineering college during a 2 day seminar - well done guys, be proud.

]]>

Although the award is not directly related to the testing of Tetryonics, it's a great step in the right direction and something T-theory students the world over should be proud of. I wish Kyle the very best in his studies, and look forward to following his research in the years to come.

http://spie.org/Documents/Courses/Education_Outreach/Scholarships/Kyle-Hill-PR14.pdf

India + 1

Canada + 1

United States = 0

A congratulations is in order for Ranjith Reddy and Abhinav Sharma for winning the special research award in recognition of their efforts in bringing Tetryonic Theory to new students at Mallareddy Engineering college during a 2 day seminar - well done guys, be proud.

]]>

"The probabilistic distributions of Planck quanta of mass-energy momenta in any equilateral charge EM field always form a normal [Bell curve] distribution – and it is this very same distribution that is the foundation of statistical mechanics in quantum theory. In other words all the higher level math currently utilized in quantum theory is in fact a reflection of the geometric distribution of Planck quanta at that level of physics. 1) ‘SQUARED” energies are in fact EQUILATERAL field geometries. 2) SQUARE ROOT linear momentum is the HEIGHT of these same EM fields and 3) DIAMOND e-field [Eo] Electric scalars are 1/2Mv^2 with Dual equilateral fields [Uo] forming Magnetic dipole moments in the same fields[1/2Mv^2] 4) And CHARGE is simply the asymmetric distribution of Planck quanta in any EM field of Force."]]>

"The probabilistic distributions of Planck quanta of mass-energy momenta in any equilateral charge EM field always form a normal [Bell curve] distribution – and it is this very same distribution that is the foundation of statistical mechanics in quantum theory. In other words all the higher level math currently utilized in quantum theory is in fact a reflection of the geometric distribution of Planck quanta at that level of physics. 1) ‘SQUARED” energies are in fact EQUILATERAL field geometries. 2) SQUARE ROOT linear momentum is the HEIGHT of these same EM fields and 3) DIAMOND e-field [Eo] Electric scalars are 1/2Mv^2 with Dual equilateral fields [Uo] forming Magnetic dipole moments in the same fields[1/2Mv^2] 4) And CHARGE is simply the asymmetric distribution of Planck quanta in any EM field of Force."]]>

]]>

]]>

“Pythagoras believed that numbers had personalities. They were masculine or feminine, perfect or incomplete, beautiful or ugly. He considered ten to be the ideal number, [summed by] one, two, three, and four, and when written in dot formation it formed a perfect triangle, named Tetractys. He believed that four signified nature, and that ten signified the universe, [and the sum of 1,2,3, and 4 was divine]. The Tetractys is both a mathematical idea and a metaphysical symbol that embraces itself, the principles of the natural world, the harmony of the cosmos, the ascent to the divine, and the mysteries of the divine realm. This symbol was so revered that it inspired Pythagoras’ followers to swear by his name as the one who brought this gift to humanity.” - Carl Huffman

]]>“Pythagoras believed that numbers had personalities. They were masculine or feminine, perfect or incomplete, beautiful or ugly. He considered ten to be the ideal number, [summed by] one, two, three, and four, and when written in dot formation it formed a perfect triangle, named Tetractys. He believed that four signified nature, and that ten signified the universe, [and the sum of 1,2,3, and 4 was divine]. The Tetractys is both a mathematical idea and a metaphysical symbol that embraces itself, the principles of the natural world, the harmony of the cosmos, the ascent to the divine, and the mysteries of the divine realm. This symbol was so revered that it inspired Pythagoras’ followers to swear by his name as the one who brought this gift to humanity.” Carl Huffman

]]>]]>

What is photon?

Photons are comprised of dual charge bosons that have combined to form a neutral quantum of energy momenta [light].

A photon's quantum charge geometry is self-similar to the EM wave it creates and it part of, and it propagates at 'c' for the medium it is within.

Each photon has a quantum magnetic moment which enables to it be polarised and refracted as it passes through fields external to it. ]]>

A: They are geometric quanta of ElectroMagnetic energy momenta, where their quantised angular momenta [m^2/s] forms their equilateral charge geometries and their linear [sqrt] momentum [mv] radiates outward in two directions from their point sources.

The changing rhombic geometry of photons in relative motion to an observer creates the changing electric and magnetic fields that we measure in modern physics as oscillating orthogonal EM waveforms..

As their electric field geometries increase their magnetic fields decrease, and as the magnetic fields increase the electric fields decrease creating a sinusoidal waveforms if E&M fields 90 degrees apart from each other yet interrelated through their energy momenta geometries.

Photons of EM energy momenta create self-similar ElectroMagnetic field geometries that can be either transverse or longitudinal wrt their direction of propagation, and posses any angle of polarization and whose phase angle relationships follow Euler's formula.

In short - they are geometric quanta that produce EM waves and interference patterns wherever they interact with each other. [Tetryonic theory]

Q: What is a photon?

A: Photons are comprised of dual charge bosons that have combined to form a neutral quantum of energy momenta [light].

Using equilateral energy all the geometries of quantum EM mass-Matter particles can be physically modeled revealing the known Standard Model particles.

The net unidirectional momentum of bosons then distinguishes them from the Photons that possess a bidirectional momentum.

Closer examination of the geometries highlights a long standing error in the mathematical formulation of QM energy formulas, namely the mistaken interchanging of Planck's quanta [v] for Einstein's frequency [f] in relation to Energy.

2D EM masses [BosonsPhotons] do not possess the physical property of 3D Matter [Fermions]. Fermions can now be defined as the standing wave energy geometries that create all the known subatomic particles the building blocks of large scale Matter and structure in the macro world.

Historically these particles have been classified according to their charges and masses, Tetryonic geometry now provides a 3D physical model of all the particles highlighting the physical source of the 1/3 charges of Quarks revealing charge to be the foundational geometry of all Matter.

**
Q: How much does a photon weigh? Step 1
**
[M]atter is a measure of ENERGY per second squared

[m]ass/ c^2 = ENERGY/c^4 = [M]atter

[m]ass * c^2 = ENERGY = [M]atter *c^4

A: The charged Planck geometry of photons [and EM waves]

[hf = E = 2hv] where the equilateral geometry of W bosons defines the rhombic geometry of photons themselves and the EM waves they in turn comprise [EVEN hv = n.hf].

[not spherical bundles of mass-energy as often illustrated in physics]

they have no z-component to their mass-energy momenta...

A: Relativistic quanta of mass-energy momenta

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The expression for momentum is, to say the least, naive. It's very confusing to take a classical approach to a particle that exhibits both classical and quantum behaviours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHAAAAT?

The error lies in physics, or rather, the oratorical abilities of Physicists and their mastery of the English language. Remember, when we say a photon has no mass, we mean that its invariant mass is zero. Let's step back again.

E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m0 c^2)^2 is equivalent to (mc^2)^2

Then we find that a photon with m0 = 0 has "relativistic mass"

m = rac{p}{c} which is directly proportional to its momentum.

m = E / c^2 = rac{p}{c} = rac{h}{c} imes = rac{1}{lambda}

particles have invariant mass [m0] and total energy [m, E]

(don't say "relativistic mass") "relativistic mass" and energy are equivalent, it is merely a unit conversion between Energy and Energy per second [m]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gravity - as distinct from gravitation is a physical force produced and experienced by all material objects that possess both mass-energy and a 3D topology...

they are comprised of dual equilateral energy quanta [W bosons]

whose inductive loop properties give rise to inertial mass

their energies measured per unit Time gives rise to mass [m]

and and associated square root linear momentum component [p]

and as a result of their charge geometries are their own anti-particle.

A photon's quantum charge geometry is self-similar to the EM wave it creates and it part of, and it propagates at 'c' for the medium it is within.

Each photon has a quantum magnetic moment which enables to it be polarised and refracted as it passes through fields external to it.

Bosons are shown to be transverse EM fields that facilitate EM induction and Photons are revealed as longitudinal dual charge pairs possessing a neutral EM charge and inherent magnetic moment.

A: In order to explain and correct common misconceptions in physics about photons and their properties and interactions with gravitational fields a clear definition and distinction must be made between 2d mass-energies [bosons-photons] & 3D Matter [Fermions].....

[m]ass is a measure of planar ENERGY per second

2d mass-energies are planar Euclidean geometries [think sheets of paper] while 3D Matter possesses a material Topology [closed volume] that can be created from those planar sheets of mass-energy.....

Tetryonic charge geometries give rise to the planar 2d geometries of mass-energy and the 3D Topologies of Matter in physics and Einstein's mass-ENERGY equivalence can now be re-formulated to provide a complete relationship for mass - ENERGY- Matter:

[m]ass = ENERGY/c^2 = [M]atter *c^2

where [m] symbolises 2d mass and [M] stands for 3D Matter so as to define and differentiate between the two in mathematical equations.

To date this has not been the case with mass & Matter being interchanged frequently for each other in physics texts even within the same sentence....

2d mass geometries per second = ENERGY /sec ^2 = 3D Matter topologies

It is 3D Matter topologies that are affected by Gravity - NOT planar mass-energies - and in order to have its motion affected by a gravity field a concentration of mass-energy MUST possess a 3D Topology.

bosons and photons are 2d planar fields of electromagnetic momenta

Correcting a centuries old erroneous and incomplete view of mass & Matter is the first step in acquiring the knowledge require to understanding the quantum mechanical properties of photons....

[in step 2 - the 2d geometries of bosons & photons are revealed]

**Q: How much does a photon weight [Step 2]**

All neutral charge photons are comprised of 2 charged bosons.

It is the equilateral EM field geometries of charged bosons within photons [and EM waves] that creates the familiar sinusoidal waveforms [simple harmonic motion] as they pass by or are absorbed by detectors etc... and which have been mistakenly idealised as functions of unit circles through maths without geometric identities...

PHOTONS ARE 2d PLANAR RHOMBIC MASS-ENERGY GEOMETRIES

In fact the same sinusoidal [rhombic] EM waveforms of photons in EM waves, when absorbed or measured are fully explained by Euler's formula [as illustrated] revealing the true identity and reason behind the beauty of his equation..... whether it is expressed as i, pi or phase angles they all relate back to the geometric EM phases of photons....

Charged W bosons [n.hv]are transverse measurements of mass-energy momenta within EM waves and photons [n.hf] are longitudinal measurements of mass-energy momenta within the same EM waveforms... there exists NO Matter [Z components] to these EM fields of mass-energy momenta and both the transverse and longitudinal waveforms can be combined to give the full wave-function of any electromagnetic waveform....

With the associates wavefunction probabilities being revealed for either transverse [boson] or longitudinal [photon] measurements of the total electromagnetic field energies.... with their associated probabilities, component linear momentum and wave-amplitude becoming easily identifiable in Tetryonic colour-coded geometrics....

The true quantum geometry of photons is finally revealed.

========================

**Q: What is the ‘weight’ of a photon? [Step 3]
**

Nothing screams error more than the 'squared' numbers, 'mass-less' photons and E=mc^2 in the mathematics of physics.........

It is time physics was taught how to differentiate 2-dimensional mass from 3D Matter and bosons from photons geometrically.......before more harm is done to the next generation of scientists....

Let’s see how confused physicists get trying to explain photon's properties in terms of 2d mass

A photon obeys E = pc. Einstein (in 1905) showed this mathematically in his seminal paper on Special Relativity by stating that E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m0 c^2)^2, where m0 is the rest mass (or invariant mass) of the particle. [Invariant means the mass in the rest frame of the particle or motionless]

Thus it become commonplace to state that a photon has no rest mass. In other words, m{0,gamma} = 0 (we usually denote photons by gamma in physics). Notice that by setting m0=0 above, we obtain E=pc.

But that's weird, because then a photon still has momentum! For us, classical momentum is attributed to an object of mass m moving at speed v such that p = mv. But a photon has no mass, therefore no momentum. Here's another question: we know photons can hit things and excite objects, so it must be transferring energy. But Einstein also said E=mc^2. So if a photon has no mass, it has no energy?

What mass was Einstein talking about when he stated E = mc^2? He clearly did not mean the invariant mass which is zero, he meant that a particle of energy [E] has relativistic mass [m]. People (back in the day) used to call this m relativistic mass. This term still carries over today.

Let's expand our equations about that total energy E here:

What's this momentum then? de Broglie's relation from wave-particle duality does state that p = rac{h}{lambda} where h is Planck's constant and lambda is the wavelength of the particle (in our case, the "colour" of the photon).

Then, we can combine everything to see that the "mass" of a photon (really, I should be calling this the energy of a photon) is just

And you can sort of see (from a semi-classical approach) that a photon with a more redder (longer, larger wavelength) will have a "smaller mass" - but what we're really saying is that it has less energy than a bluer photon.

To summarize:

Tetryonics shows us that Energy and mass are equivalent [as per Einstein's formula E=mc^2].... ie any measurement of Energy per second is a measurement of 2d mass, leading to the measurements of momentum [p=mv] associated with EM waves....

What the photon doesn't have [as it's a 2d planar field of EM mass-energy] is any 3D Matter topology [or extended Z component to its energy waveform]...... as Tetryonic theory charged geometries clearly show.

In short a photon has a relativistic [velocity related de Broglie WAVE-length], but it is 'Matter-less' field or weightless particle in gravitational fields.

So how can it be bent by such fields as 'shown' in General Relativity, it path through space can't be bent by gravity , a photon is REFRACTED by the external EM fields it is moving through [Faraday effect, polarisation etc].

It all comes down to scientists not defining the geometric properties of photons correctly and mixing up mass & Matter in the math equations that describe them, and then interchanging [m] for [M] in their explanations of the same.

Thankfully a geometric solution is at hand.

Until modern physics learns to differentiate between mass & Matter [and the role charge plays in QM] it will continue to 'pat itself on the back' on the experimental verification of data while drawing incorrect extrapolations from experimental results and the maths associated with those results...

What is desperately needed is a new theory that explains the experimental results obtained, corrects the underlying maths and unites the separate fields of physics, chemistry, biology and cosmology into one unified theory... [Tetryonics is just that theory]

**Q: The Weight of a Photon [Step 4]**

A: It can now be shown, and understood if you have been following the previous posts, that photons are planar geometries of mass-energy momenta.

Their rhombic [dual-equilateral] electromagnetic fields geometries are comprised of 2 charged bosons [W] that posses sqrt linear momentum causing the photon to radiate in two directions from their point sources.

Any measurement of these energies per second [E/c^2] is a measurement of mass, but as there is NO Z component to 2d planar field geometries [ie no closed topologies] they are in fact MATTER-less fields... or fields of weightless mass-energy momenta.

Their planar rhombic geometries are in fact the result of their quantised angular momenta [the m^2/s of Planck's constant] and it in turn is NOT a vector rotation about a point [spin] as is taught in modern physics but an equilateral geometry at the quantum scale.

Their 'spin' can in fact be modelled as an ideal quantum inductive loop of EM energies [as illustrated] which in turn gives rise to the physics and properties of inertial mass.

Their rhombic dual charge field geometries give rise to the sinusoidal orthogonal electromagnetic waveforms associated with EM waves and photons alike.

And they are completely unaffected by Gravity.....

As photons [and bosons] do not possess a 3D topology [Z component] to their planar 2d fields of mass-energy momenta they are not affected by gravity fields - they are however subject to forces subjected upon them by external EM fields like those found near planets and stars and in particle accelerators etc...

The 'bending' of light near to stars etc is a in fact the 'lensing or refraction' of photons of light due to the EM component of gravitational field.... [GR]aviation = [G]ravity + EM fields near Matter.

As GR and Newton alike do not define or differentiate between 2d mass & 3D Matter in their equations neither can explain these physical properties like Tetryonics can.... yet they play an important role in the mechanics of our Universe on all energy scales.. the use of stress energy tensors [Tab] based on E=mc^2 or the geometrics of Newton [G.(M1.M2)/r^2] is simply insufficient to reveal and explain the mechanics of universal gravitation...

Photons are 'Matterless' particles - weightless EM field geometries

They are also geometrically self-similar to the EM field sthey create

A single photon comprised of 2 Planck quanta has:

and as the photon passes through differing mediums its linear momentum [p=mv] will change as its velocity of propagation will be affected by the impedance [Z = Eo*Uo] of medium itself.

'mass-less particle' is a complete misnomer for bosons, photons and EM waves alike as is the question what is the 'weight of a photon'..

A photon is weightless in a Gravity field as it is a planar 2d EM field of mass-energy momentum NOT a material 3D particle topology..... but its path can be refracted by the medium [external EM fields and Matter] through which it passes.

]]>

Any challenger to the accepted theories of ‘modern’ physics must by definition disagree with the accepted theories and offer alternative hypotheses with which it seeks to improve upon or replace the existing theories – this is how we advance our understanding. Sometimes that knowledge comes in small increments or changes, at other times the changes require a profound re-interpretation and understanding of the countless observations and measurements – this was the case when quantum mechanics was born and remained the case as relativity theory strove to advance our understanding – it remains the case today as Tetryonic theory is presented to the World.]]>

Any challenger to the accepted theories of ‘modern’ physics must by definition disagree with the accepted theories and offer alternative hypotheses with which it seeks to improve upon or replace the existing theories – this is how we advance our understanding. Sometimes that knowledge comes in small increments or changes, at other times the changes require a profound re-interpretation and understanding of the countless observations and measurements – this was the case when quantum mechanics was born and remained the case as relativity theory strove to advance our understanding – it remains the case today as Tetryonic theory is presented to the World.

**If Math is the language of Physics, then Geometry is the Grammar the Math must follow.**

So the next item that comes to my mind would be, show me the geometry, and what you

mean exactly?

Tetryonics reveals that Square Numbers are Equilateral Geometries and ever since Greek

times, Square Numbers have been incorrectly identified with Square Geometries. Wayne

Roberts Scale Structure Theory would agree on this point.

"The Pythagorean equation is at the core of much of geometry, it links geometry with algebra, and is the foundation of trigonometry. Without it, accurate surveying, mapmaking, and navigation would be impossible, but its application to the energy-momenta geometries of Electromagnetic fields and Matter in motion in Physics is erroneous and must be corrected for science to advance."--Abraham

]]>

]]>

]]>

Tetryonics theory reveals these to be discrete finite elements [or quanta] that form transverse Bosons [odd.hv] involved in EM induction, and longitudinal Photons [2n.hv] involved in the transmission of energy momenta.

Accordingly infinities, while catered for by the exponential, equilateral geometry of the fields themselves remain just a mathematical tool as each field is composed of discrete, finite elements of mass.momenta [Planck quanta], with successive ODD hv quanta integrating to form SQUARED hv scalar energy fields of energy momenta whose physical properties and probability distributions can be measured in terms of their inertial mass [m].

These distributions are an inherent foundational property of physics at the quantum-scale due to the equilateral Planck quanta that forms mass-ENERGY-Matter and its fields of Force & motion.

Accordingly, it follows that any change to the known physics of a measured system MUST be afforded to that system through the emission and absorption of discrete, finite odd.hv quantum 'steps' [or bosons] of energy momenta." --KCA

]]>

Tetryonics theory reveals these to be discrete finite elements [or quanta] that form transverse Bosons [odd.hv] involved in EM induction, and longitudinal Photons [2n.hv] involved in the transmission of energy momenta.

Accordingly infinities, while catered for by the exponential, equilateral geometry of the fields themselves remain just a mathematical tool as each field is composed of discrete, finite elements of mass.momenta [Planck quanta], with successive ODD hv quanta integrating to form SQUARED hv scalar energy fields of energy momenta whose physical properties and probability distributions can be measured in terms of their inertial mass [m].

These distributions are an inherent foundational property of physics at the quantum-scale due to the equilateral Planck quanta that forms mass-ENERGY-Matter and its fields of Force & motion.

Accordingly, it follows that any change to the known physics of a measured system MUST be afforded to that system through the emission and absorption of discrete, finite odd.hv quantum 'steps' [or bosons] of energy momenta." --KCA

]]>

http://alexpetty.com/2014/10/14/operating-meyers-vic/

http://open-source-energy.org/

]]>

http://alexpetty.com/2014/10/14/operating-meyers-vic/

http://open-source-energy.org/

]]>

"NO-one is more blind than those who think they know it all, and there is NO room for improvement in science.

What is CHARGE, and what role does it play in everyday physics?

EM charge is the asymmetric distribution of equilateral Planck quanta within electromagnetic fields.

The polarity of each charged field is determined by the magnetic dipole that forms within the field and its vector direction with respect to the electric field.The E&M fields of every Planck quantum [Zero Point Field] contributes to the creation of all the nuclear forces [Weak, Strong and EM] that shape the various geometric fields and Matter topologies found throughout our physical universe, and give rise to Coulomb's law of Attraction, in turn creating motion in our Universe as charges seek equilibrium.

Nothing screams error more than the 'squared' numbers, 'mass-less' photons and E=mc^2 in the mathematics of physics.

It is time physisists are taught how to differentiate 2-dimensional mass from 3D Matter and bosons from photons GEOMETRICALLY, before more harm is done to the next generation of scientists." KCA]]>

"NO-one is more blind than those who think they know it all, and there is NO room for improvement in science.

What is CHARGE, and what role does it play in everyday physics?

EM charge is the asymmetric distribution of equilateral Planck quanta within electromagnetic fields.

The polarity of each charged field is determined by the magnetic dipole that forms within the field and its vector direction with respect to the electric field.The E&M fields of every Planck quantum [Zero Point Field] contributes to the creation of all the nuclear forces [Weak, Strong and EM] that shape the various geometric fields and Matter topologies found throughout our physical universe, and give rise to Coulomb's law of Attraction, in turn creating motion in our Universe as charges seek equilibrium.

Nothing screams error more than the 'squared' numbers, 'mass-less' photons and E=mc^2 in the mathematics of physics.

It is time physisists are taught how to differentiate 2-dimensional mass from 3D Matter and bosons from photons GEOMETRICALLY, before more harm is done to the next generation of scientists." KCA]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

http://www.rexresearch.com/merkl/merkl.htm#sumertech]]>

In the 1920s, Thomas Henry Moray demonstrated a "radiant energy device" to many people who were unable to find a hidden power source. Moray called his device a solid state detector or the Moray Valve consisting of a large antenna connected to a complex series of high voltage capacitors, transformers, and semiconductors. By stimulating the existing oscillations of radiant energy from space the device ran for several days producing 50 kilowatts of power. The demonstrations attracted newspapers and scientists from Bell Laboratories and from the Department of Agriculture but none could attest to how the device actually operated nor could evidence of fraud be found. The device was eventually destroyed by his assistant, whom apparently was angered that Moray would not sell his device to corporate interests.

(or there may have been more to this - see what I have written below)

Moray was a follower of Nikola Tesla - As a youth he greatly admired Tesla - and in particular was very interested in Teslas' obsession with the earth having a limitless supply of energy available to it from the universe. Like Tesla - Moray wanted to find out how to tap this energy. Like a lot of people he became amazed at the "Crystal Radio" where a crystal can be tapped with a fine wire to make a radio work - without any battery or power. He figured that if this was possible it should be possible to find a crystal (or "magnetic rock" ) that could be tapped for a power source. He became very interested in the properties of certain rocks and crystal structures and the powders from them - this is what he made his so called Moray Valves out of - they were like radio valves BUT WERE NOT USING A HEATED COIL like radio valves - they were all cold with no external power to feed them. They were a mixture of semi-conducting materials and intricate one-way conducting materials. The Moray Valve was therefore a solid state device - unlike a radio valve that heated a plate to produce energy.

]]>

In the 1920s, Thomas Henry Moray demonstrated a "radiant energy device" to many people who were unable to find a hidden power source. Moray called his device a solid state detector or the Moray Valve consisting of a large antenna connected to a complex series of high voltage capacitors, transformers, and semiconductors. By stimulating the existing oscillations of radiant energy from space the device ran for several days producing 50 kilowatts of power. The demonstrations attracted newspapers and scientists from Bell Laboratories and from the Department of Agriculture but none could attest to how the device actually operated nor could evidence of fraud be found. The device was eventually destroyed by his assistant, whom apparently was angered that Moray would not sell his device to corporate interests.

(or there may have been more to this - see what I have written below)

Moray was a follower of Nikola Tesla - As a youth he greatly admired Tesla - and in particular was very interested in Teslas' obsession with the earth having a limitless supply of energy available to it from the universe. Like Tesla - Moray wanted to find out how to tap this energy. Like a lot of people he became amazed at the "Crystal Radio" where a crystal can be tapped with a fine wire to make a radio work - without any battery or power. He figured that if this was possible it should be possible to find a crystal (or "magnetic rock" ) that could be tapped for a power source. He became very interested in the properties of certain rocks and crystal structures and the powders from them - this is what he made his so called Moray Valves out of - they were like radio valves BUT WERE NOT USING A HEATED COIL like radio valves - they were all cold with no external power to feed them. They were a mixture of semi-conducting materials and intricate one-way conducting materials. The Moray Valve was therefore a solid state device - unlike a radio valve that heated a plate to produce energy.

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

In regard to every form of human activity it is necessary that the question should be asked from time to time, What is its purpose and ideal? In what way does it contribute to the beauty of human existence? As respects those pursuits which contribute only remotely, by providing the mechanism of life, it is well to be reminded that not the mere fact of living is to be desired, but the art of living in the contemplation of great things. Still more in regard to those avocations which have no end outside themselves, which are to be justified, if at all, as actually adding to the sum of the world's permanent possessions, it is necessary to keep alive a knowledge of their aims, a clear prefiguring vision of the temple in which creative imagination is to be embodied.

The fulfilment of this need, in what concerns the studies forming the material upon which custom has decided to train the youthful mind, is indeed sadly remote—so remote as to make the mere statement of such a claim appear preposterous. Great men, fully alive to the beauty of the contemplations to whose service their lives are devoted, desiring that others may share in their joys, persuade mankind to impart to the successive generations the mechanical knowledge without which it is impossible to cross the threshold. Dry pedants possess themselves of the privilege of instilling this knowledge: they forget that it is to serve but as a key to open the doors of the temple; though they spend their lives on the steps leading up to those sacred doors, they turn their backs upon the temple so resolutely that its very existence is forgotten, and the eager youth, who would press forward to be initiated to its domes and arches, is bidden to turn back and count the steps.

Mathematics, perhaps more even than the study of Greece and Rome, has suffered from this oblivion of its due place in civilisation. Although tradition has decreed that the great bulk of educated men shall know at least the elements of the subject, the reasons for which the tradition arose are forgotten, buried beneath a great rubbish-heap of pedantries and trivialities. To those who inquire as to the purpose of mathematics, the usual answer will be that it facilitates the making of machines, the travelling from place to place, and the victory over foreign nations, whether in war or commerce. If it be objected that these ends—all of which are of doubtful value—are not furthered by the merely elementary study imposed upon those who do not become expert mathematicians, the reply, it is true, will probably be that mathematics trains the reasoning faculties. Yet the very men who make this reply are, for the most part, unwilling to abandon the teaching of definite fallacies, known to be such, and instinctively rejected by the unsophisticated mind of every intelligent learner. And the reasoning faculty itself is generally conceived, by those who urge its cultivation, as merely a means for the avoidance of pitfalls and a help in the discovery of rules for the guidance of practical life. All these are undeniably important achievements to the credit of mathematics; yet it is none of these that entitles mathematics to a place in every liberal education. Plato, we know, regarded the contemplation of mathematical truths as worthy of the Deity; and Plato realised, more perhaps than any other single man, what those elements are in human life which merit a place in heaven. There is in mathematics, he says, "something which is necessary and cannot be set aside ... and, if I mistake not, of divine necessity; for as to the human necessities of which the Many talk in this connection, nothing can be more ridiculous than such an application of the words. Cleinias. And what are these necessities of knowledge, Stranger, which are divine and not human? Athenian. Those things without some use or knowledge of which a man cannot become a God to the world, nor a spirit, nor yet a hero, nor able earnestly to think and care for man" (Laws, p. 818). Such was Plato's judgment of mathematics; but the mathematicians do not read Plato, while those who read him know no mathematics, and regard his opinion upon this question as merely a curious aberration.

Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty—a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show. The true spirit of delight, the exaltation, the sense of being more than man, which is the touchstone of the highest excellence, is to be found in mathematics as surely as in poetry. What is best in mathematics deserves not merely to be learnt as a task, but to be assimilated as a part of daily thought, and brought again and again before the mind with ever-renewed encouragement. Real life is, to most men, a long second-best, a perpetual compromise between the ideal and the possible; but the world of pure reason knows no compromise, no practical limitations, no barrier to the creative activity embodying in splendid edifices the passionate aspiration after the perfect from which all great work springs. Remote from human passions, remote even from the pitiful facts of nature, the generations have gradually created an ordered cosmos, where pure thought can dwell as in its natural home, and where one, at least, of our nobler impulses can escape from the dreary exile of the actual world. So little, however, have mathematicians aimed at beauty, that hardly anything in their work has had this conscious purpose. Much, owing to irrepressible instincts, which were better than avowed beliefs, has been moulded by an unconscious taste; but much also has been spoilt by false notions of what was fitting. The characteristic excellence of mathematics is only to be found where the reasoning is rigidly logical: the rules of logic are to mathematics what those of structure are to architecture. In the most beautiful work, a chain of argument is presented in which every link is important on its own account, in which there is an air of ease and lucidity throughout, and the premises achieve more than would have been thought possible, by means which appear natural and inevitable. Literature embodies what is general in particular circumstances whose universal significance shines through their individual dress; but mathematics endeavours to present whatever is most general in its purity, without any irrelevant trappings.

How should the teaching of mathematics be conducted so as to communicate to the learner as much as possible of this high ideal? Here experience must, in a great measure, be our guide; but some maxims may result from our consideration of the ultimate purpose to be achieved.

One of the chief ends served by mathematics, when rightly taught, is to awaken the learner's belief in reason, his confidence in the truth of what has been demonstrated, and in the value of demonstration. This purpose is not served by existing instruction; but it is easy to see ways in which it might be served. At present, in what concerns arithmetic, the boy or girl is given a set of rules, which present themselves as neither true nor false, but as merely the will of the teacher, the way in which, for some unfathomable reason, the teacher prefers to have the game played. To some degree, in a study of such definite practical utility, this is no doubt unavoidable; but as soon as possible, the reasons of rules should be set forth by whatever means most readily appeal to the childish mind. In geometry, instead of the tedious apparatus of fallacious proofs for obvious truisms which constitutes the beginning of Euclid, the learner should be allowed at first to assume the truth of everything obvious, and should be instructed in the demonstrations of theorems which are at once startling and easily verifiable by actual drawing, such as those in which it is shown that three or more lines meet in a point. In this way belief is generated; it is seen that reasoning may lead to startling conclusions, which nevertheless the facts will verify; and thus the instinctive distrust of whatever is abstract or rational is gradually overcome. Where theorems are difficult, they should be first taught as exercises in geometrical drawing, until the figure has become thoroughly familiar; it will then be an agreeable advance to be taught the logical connections of the various lines or circles that occur. It is desirable also that the figure illustrating a theorem should be drawn in all possible cases and shapes, that so the abstract relations with which geometry is concerned may of themselves emerge as the residue of similarity amid such great apparent diversity. In this way the abstract demonstrations should form but a small part of the instruction, and should be given when, by familiarity with concrete illustrations, they have come to be felt as the natural embodiment of visible fact. In this early stage proofs should not be given with pedantic fullness; definitely fallacious methods, such as that of superposition, should be rigidly excluded from the first, but where, without such methods, the proof would be very difficult, the result should be rendered acceptable by arguments and illustrations which are explicitly contrasted with demonstrations.

In the beginning of algebra, even the most intelligent child finds, as a rule, very great difficulty. The use of letters is a mystery, which seems to have no purpose except mystification. It is almost impossible, at first, not to think that every letter stands for some particular number, if only the teacher would reveal what number it stands for. The fact is, that in algebra the mind is first taught to consider general truths, truths which are not asserted to hold only of this or that particular thing, but of any one of a whole group of things. It is in the power of understanding and discovering such truths that the mastery of the intellect over the whole world of things actual and possible resides; and ability to deal with the general as such is one of the gifts that a mathematical education should bestow. But how little, as a rule, is the teacher of algebra able to explain the chasm which divides it from arithmetic, and how little is the learner assisted in his groping efforts at comprehension! Usually the method that has been adopted in arithmetic is continued: rules are set forth, with no adequate explanation of their grounds; the pupil learns to use the rules blindly, and presently, when he is able to obtain the answer that the teacher desires, he feels that he has mastered the difficulties of the subject. But of inner comprehension of the processes employed he has probably acquired almost nothing.

When algebra has been learnt, all goes smoothly until we reach those studies in which the notion of infinity is employed—the infinitesimal calculus and the whole of higher mathematics. The solution of the difficulties which formerly surrounded the mathematical infinite is probably the greatest achievement of which our own age has to boast. Since the beginnings of Greek thought these difficulties have been known; in every age the finest intellects have vainly endeavoured to answer the apparently unanswerable questions that had been asked by Zeno the Eleatic. At last Georg Cantor has found the answer, and has conquered for the intellect a new and vast province which had been given over to Chaos and old Night. It was assumed as self-evident, until Cantor and Dedekind established the opposite, that if, from any collection of things, some were taken away, the number of things left must always be less than the original number of things. This assumption, as a matter of fact, holds only of finite collections; and the rejection of it, where the infinite is concerned, has been shown to remove all the difficulties that had hitherto baffled human reason in this matter, and to render possible the creation of an exact science of the infinite. This stupendous fact ought to produce a revolution in the higher teaching of mathematics; it has itself added immeasurably to the educational value of the subject, and it has at last given the means of treating with logical precision many studies which, until lately, were wrapped in fallacy and obscurity. By those who were educated on the old lines, the new work is considered to be appallingly difficult, abstruse, and obscure; and it must be confessed that the discoverer, as is so often the case, has hardly himself emerged from the mists which the light of his intellect is dispelling. But inherently, the new doctrine of the infinite, to all candid and inquiring minds, has facilitated the mastery of higher mathematics; for hitherto, it has been necessary to learn, by a long process of sophistication, to give assent to arguments which, on first acquaintance, were rightly judged to be confused and erroneous. So far from producing a fearless belief in reason, a bold rejection of whatever failed to fulfil the strictest requirements of logic, a mathematical training, during the past two centuries, encouraged the belief that many things, which a rigid inquiry would reject as fallacious, must yet be accepted because they work in what the mathematician calls "practice." By this means, a timid, compromising spirit, or else a sacerdotal belief in mysteries not intelligible to the profane, has been bred where reason alone should have ruled. All this it is now time to sweep away; let those who wish to penetrate into the arcana of mathematics be taught at once the true theory in all its logical purity, and in the concatenation established by the very essence of the entities concerned.

If we are considering mathematics as an end in itself, and not as a technical training for engineers, it is very desirable to preserve the purity and strictness of its reasoning. Accordingly those who have attained a sufficient familiarity with its easier portions should be led backward from propositions to which they have assented as self-evident to more and more fundamental principles from which what had previously appeared as premises can be deduced. They should be taught—what the theory of infinity very aptly illustrates—that many propositions seem self-evident to the untrained mind which, nevertheless, a nearer scrutiny shows to be false. By this means they will be led to a sceptical inquiry into first principles, an examination of the foundations upon which the whole edifice of reasoning is built, or, to take perhaps a more fitting metaphor, the great trunk from which the spreading branches spring. At this stage, it is well to study afresh the elementary portions of mathematics, asking no longer merely whether a given proposition is true, but also how it grows out of the central principles of logic. Questions of this nature can now be answered with a precision and certainty which were formerly quite impossible; and in the chains of reasoning that the answer requires the unity of all mathematical studies at last unfolds itself.

In the great majority of mathematical text-books there is a total lack of unity in method and of systematic development of a central theme. Propositions of very diverse kinds are proved by whatever means are thought most easily intelligible, and much space is devoted to mere curiosities which in no way contribute to the main argument. But in the greatest works, unity and inevitability are felt as in the unfolding of a drama; in the premisses a subject is proposed for consideration, and in every subsequent step some definite advance is made towards mastery of its nature. The love of system, of interconnection, which is perhaps the inmost essence of the intellectual impulse, can find free play in mathematics as nowhere else. The learner who feels this impulse must not be repelled by an array of meaningless examples or distracted by amusing oddities, but must be encouraged to dwell upon central principles, to become familiar with the structure of the various subjects which are put before him, to travel easily over the steps of the more important deductions. In this way a good tone of mind is cultivated, and selective attention is taught to dwell by preference upon what is weighty and essential.

When the separate studies into which mathematics is divided have each been viewed as a logical whole, as a natural growth from the propositions which constitute their principles, the learner will be able to understand the fundamental science which unifies and systematises the whole of deductive reasoning. This is symbolic logic—a study which, though it owes its inception to Aristotle, is yet, in its wider developments, a product, almost wholly, of the nineteenth century, and is indeed, in the present day, still growing with great rapidity. The true method of discovery in symbolic logic, and probably also the best method for introducing the study to a learner acquainted with other parts of mathematics, is the analysis of actual examples of deductive reasoning, with a view to the discovery of the principles employed. These principles, for the most part, are so embedded in our ratiocinative instincts, that they are employed quite unconsciously, and can be dragged to light only by much patient effort. But when at last they have been found, they are seen to be few in number, and to be the sole source of everything in pure mathematics. The discovery that all mathematics follows inevitably from a small collection of fundamental laws is one which immeasurably enhances the intellectual beauty of the whole; to those who have been oppressed by the fragmentary and incomplete nature of most existing chains of deduction this discovery comes with all the overwhelming force of a revelation; like a palace emerging from the autumn mist as the traveller ascends an Italian hill-side, the stately storeys of the mathematical edifice appear in their due order and proportion, with a new perfection in every part.

Until symbolic logic had acquired its present development, the principles upon which mathematics depends were always supposed to be philosophical, and discoverable only by the uncertain, unprogressive methods hitherto employed by philosophers. So long as this was thought, mathematics seemed to be not autonomous, but dependent upon a study which had quite other methods than its own. Moreover, since the nature of the postulates from which arithmetic, analysis, and geometry are to be deduced was wrapped in all the traditional obscurities of metaphysical discussion, the edifice built upon such dubious foundations began to be viewed as no better than a castle in the air. In this respect, the discovery that the true principles are as much a part of mathematics as any of their consequences has very greatly increased the intellectual satisfaction to be obtained. This satisfaction ought not to be refused to learners capable of enjoying it, for it is of a kind to increase our respect for human powers and our knowledge of the beauties belonging to the abstract world.

Philosophers have commonly held that the laws of logic, which underlie mathematics, are laws of thought, laws regulating the operations of our minds. By this opinion the true dignity of reason is very greatly lowered: it ceases to be an investigation into the very heart and immutable essence of all things actual and possible, becoming, instead, an inquiry into something more or less human and subject to our limitations. The contemplation of what is non-human, the discovery that our minds are capable of dealing with material not created by them, above all, the realisation that beauty belongs to the outer world as to the inner, are the chief means of overcoming the terrible sense of impotence, of weakness, of exile amid hostile powers, which is too apt to result from acknowledging the all-but omnipotence of alien forces. To reconcile us, by the exhibition of its awful beauty, to the reign of Fate—which is merely the literary personification of these forces—is the task of tragedy. But mathematics takes us still further from what is human, into the region of absolute necessity, to which not only the actual world, but every possible world, must conform; and even here it builds a habitation, or rather finds a habitation eternally standing, where our ideals are fully satisfied and our best hopes are not thwarted. It is only when we thoroughly understand the entire independence of ourselves, which belongs to this world that reason finds, that we can adequately realise the profound importance of its beauty.

Not only is mathematics independent of us and our thoughts, but in another sense we and the whole universe of existing things are independent of mathematics. The apprehension of this purely ideal character is indispensable, if we are to understand rightly the place of mathematics as one among the arts. It was formerly supposed that pure reason could decide, in some respects, as to the nature of the actual world: geometry, at least, was thought to deal with the space in which we live. But we now know that pure mathematics can never pronounce upon questions of actual existence: the world of reason, in a sense, controls the world of fact, but it is not at any point creative of fact, and in the application of its results to the world in time and space, its certainty and precision are lost among approximations and working hypotheses. The objects considered by mathematicians have, in the past, been mainly of a kind suggested by phenomena; but from such restrictions the abstract imagination should be wholly free. A reciprocal liberty must thus be accorded: reason cannot dictate to the world of facts, but the facts cannot restrict reason's privilege of dealing with whatever objects its love of beauty may cause to seem worthy of consideration. Here, as elsewhere, we build up our own ideals out of the fragments to be found in the world; and in the end it is hard to say whether the result is a creation or a discovery.

It is very desirable, in instruction, not merely to persuade the student of the accuracy of important theorems, but to persuade him in the way which itself has, of all possible ways, the most beauty. The true interest of a demonstration is not, as traditional modes of exposition suggest, concentrated wholly in the result; where this does occur, it must be viewed as a defect, to be remedied, if possible, by so generalising the steps of the proof that each becomes important in and for itself. An argument which serves only to prove a conclusion is like a story subordinated to some moral which it is meant to teach: for æsthetic perfection no part of the whole should be merely a means. A certain practical spirit, a desire for rapid progress, for conquest of new realms, is responsible for the undue emphasis upon results which prevails in mathematical instruction. The better way is to propose some theme for consideration—in geometry, a figure having important properties; in analysis, a function of which the study is illuminating, and so on. Whenever proofs depend upon some only of the marks by which we define the object to be studied, these marks should be isolated and investigated on their own account. For it is a defect, in an argument, to employ more premisses than the conclusion demands: what mathematicians call elegance results from employing only the essential principles in virtue of which the thesis is true. It is a merit in Euclid that he advances as far as he is able to go without employing the axiom of parallels—not, as is often said, because this axiom is inherently objectionable, but because, in mathematics, every new axiom diminishes the generality of the resulting theorems, and the greatest possible generality is before all things to be sought.

Of the effects of mathematics outside its own sphere more has been written than on the subject of its own proper ideal. The effect upon philosophy has, in the past, been most notable, but most varied; in the seventeenth century, idealism and rationalism, in the eighteenth, materialism and sensationalism, seemed equally its offspring. Of the effect which it is likely to have in the future it would be very rash to say much; but in one respect a good result appears probable. Against that kind of scepticism which abandons the pursuit of ideals because the road is arduous and the goal not certainly attainable, mathematics, within its own sphere, is a complete answer. Too often it is said that there is no absolute truth, but only opinion and private judgment; that each of us is conditioned, in his view of the world, by his own peculiarities, his own taste and bias; that there is no external kingdom of truth to which, by patience and discipline, we may at last obtain admittance, but only truth for me, for you, for every separate person. By this habit of mind one of the chief ends of human effort is denied, and the supreme virtue of candour, of fearless acknowledgment of what is, disappears from our moral vision. Of such scepticism mathematics is a perpetual reproof; for its edifice of truths stands unshakable and inexpungable to all the weapons of doubting cynicism.

The effects of mathematics upon practical life, though they should not be regarded as the motive of our studies, may be used to answer a doubt to which the solitary student must always be liable. In a world so full of evil and suffering, retirement into the cloister of contemplation, to the enjoyment of delights which, however noble, must always be for the few only, cannot but appear as a somewhat selfish refusal to share the burden imposed upon others by accidents in which justice plays no part. Have any of us the right, we ask, to withdraw from present evils, to leave our fellow-men unaided, while we live a life which, though arduous and austere, is yet plainly good in its own nature? When these questions arise, the true answer is, no doubt, that some must keep alive the sacred fire, some must preserve, in every generation, the haunting vision which shadows forth the goal of so much striving. But when, as must sometimes occur, this answer seems too cold, when we are almost maddened by the spectacle of sorrows to which we bring no help, then we may reflect that indirectly the mathematician often does more for human happiness than any of his more practically active contemporaries. The history of science abundantly proves that a body of abstract propositions—even if, as in the case of conic sections, it remains two thousand years without effect upon daily life—may yet, at any moment, be used to cause a revolution in the habitual thoughts and occupations of every citizen. The use of steam and electricity—to take striking instances—is rendered possible only by mathematics. In the results of abstract thought the world possesses a capital of which the employment in enriching the common round has no hitherto discoverable limits. Nor does experience give any means of deciding what parts of mathematics will be found useful. Utility, therefore, can be only a consolation in moments of discouragement, not a guide in directing our studies.

For the health of the moral life, for ennobling the tone of an age or a nation, the austerer virtues have a strange power, exceeding the power of those not informed and purified by thought. Of these austerer virtues the love of truth is the chief, and in mathematics, more than elsewhere, the love of truth may find encouragement for waning faith. Every great study is not only an end in itself, but also a means of creating and sustaining a lofty habit of mind; and this purpose should be kept always in view throughout the teaching and learning of mathematics.

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

by Gary Null

http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/rehabilitacion-fis/biomagnetic_healing..pdf

]]>by Gary Null

http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/rehabilitacion-fis/biomagnetic_healing..pdf

]]>Tetryonic theory is a fully relativistic quantum theory of mass-Energy-Matter and its forces of motion that unifies Classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics through Planck geometries.

How does it differ from accepted theory?

Tetryonic Theory provides a quantitative model of modern physics developed from practical mechanical and electrical engineering principles that provides new insights into the source and role of charge in particle physics.

It extends from the creation of sub-atomic particles and fileds of quantum theory and their relativistic motions into the cosmological scale of stars and galaxies.

It builds on the single postulate that quantised angular momenta is in fact a measure of the equilateral geometry of Planck's constant and that the 'square' number energy levels found in quantum theory are in fact scalar energy geometries.

How does it apply?...

]]>Tetryonic theory is a fully relativistic quantum theory of mass-Energy-Matter and its forces of motion that unifies Classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics through Planck geometries.

How does it differ from accepted theory?

Tetryonic Theory provides a quantitative model of modern physics developed from practical mechanical and electrical engineering principles that provides new insights into the source and role of charge in particle physics.

It extends from the creation of sub-atomic particles and fields of quantum theory and their relativistic motions into the cosmological scale of stars and galaxies.

It builds on the single postulate that quantised angular momenta is in fact a measure of the equilateral geometry of Planck's constant and that the 'square' number energy levels found in quantum theory are in fact scalar energy geometries.

How does it apply?

Tetryonics provides a number of corrections to the foundational assumptions underpinning modern theory and facilitates the creation of an accurate bottom-up engineered model of the mechanics of nature on all scales.

It offers new insights into the development of a coherent unified model of QM, QED, Chemistry, Biology, and Cosmology and facilitates the application of new foundational geometric insights into the mathematics of modern physics.

Tetryonic Theory corrects the assumption errors of math that have crept in the explanation of physics over the past 4 centuries leading to the present day impasses of theory.

Its applications and explanations extend from foundational quantum mechanics to electrical theory, chemistry, and cosmology alike, leading to the first coherent geometric unification of the sciences.

The unified relativistic quantum theory of mass-ENERGY-Matter and its forces of motion explaining the current mysteries of the modern physics.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The foundational priori postulate on which Tetryonics is built upon is that quantised angular momenta of Planck's constant [m^2/s] is in fact an equilateral [triangular] geometry not 'a squared' geometry as the math and texts suggest....

Using this single postulate many, many new discoveries and corrections can be made and modelled wrt modern theory

The eBooks contain numerous corrections to modern science assumptions and document a number of possible tests .....

QUANTUM MECHANICS

Tetryons [Matter quanta] hiding in the existing accelerator experimental data and mistaken for electrons or strange quarks on the basis of their identical mass-charge ratios...

The charge topologies of SM fields and Fermions themselves as well as the charge topology of all 120 periodic elements...

QED

A geometric explanation of electricity and electrical energy differentiating between charge and current and a corrected energy model for Rydberg's formula for Hydrogen and its extension to account for the spectral emissions of every periodic element as well as wave-particle diffraction experiments.

CHEMISTRY

A new periodic table based on these charged topologies that builds on the source and role of charge in physics to correct current models of fission and fusion and to marry Bohr orbitals and Schrodinger quantum numbers into a single 3D model of all elements [negative the spherical model and excess neutrons in the process]

COSMOLOGY

A geometric explanation and model of universal gravitation that not only accounts for the similarity between Newton's formulation for Gravity and Coulomb's formula for charge interaction but also explains gravitation on all energy scales [classical, quantum and relativistic]

MATHEMATICS

AND most importantly using the corrections provided by equilateral Planck geometries a unified field equation for all of the above that reveals the 'hidden' geometric constant within Planck's constant that allows mass to be differentiated from Matter in order to reveal the quantum geometries and topologies of energy on all scales in our Universe.... and to unify classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics into a single coherent theory....

And many minor geometric correction to the erroneous false assumptions of mathematics regarding the underlying geometry that produces the mathematics we use to model physics in all these fields

Of course these are just dot points of all the major discoveries in my eBooks and do not even cover the new technologies that I am working on presently that arise directly from Tetryonic theory, which in due course will be released publicly.

with time and effort I am sure you'll come to see the errors of our ways and and gain the enlightenment we all seek...

d.QAM/c^2 = d.[m^2/s]/[s^2/m^2] = d.s = TIME

Space-time is a scientific non-sequitur, a mathematical abstraction created to explain relativistic motions and gravitation accelerations.

Space [any spatial co-ordinate system] is separate from Time [d.seconds] in physics which is revealed to be a measure of the changing Planck quanta geometries in any spatial region of measurement.

TIME = [d.QAM/c^2] = d.[m^2/s]*[s^2/m^2] = d.[seconds]

Neither is Quantised Angular Momenta a vector rotation about a point as has been assumed in modern physics - it is in fact a scalar measure of equilateral Planck geometries per second [m^2/s]

In turn revealing CHARGE to be a measure of quantum scale inductive [inertial] mass.seconds - distinct from the causal [entropic] arrow of time as measured and observed on the macro-scale.

See also Tetryonics on Time

]]>d.QAM/c^2 = d.[m^2/s]/[s^2/m^2] = d.s = TIME

Space-time is a scientific non-sequitur, a mathematical abstraction created to explain relativistic motions and gravitation accelerations.

Space [any spatial co-ordinate system] is separate from Time [d.seconds] in physics which is revealed to be a measure of the changing Planck quanta geometries in any spatial region of measurement.

TIME = [d.QAM/c^2] = d.[m^2/s]*[s^2/m^2] = d.[seconds]

Neither is Quantised Angular Momenta a vector rotation about a point as has been assumed in modern physics - it is in fact a scalar measure of equilateral Planck geometries per second [m^2/s]

In turn revealing CHARGE to be a measure of quantum scale inductive [inertial] mass.seconds - distinct from the causal [entropic] arrow of time as measured and observed on the macro-scale.

See also Tetryonics on Time

]]>The search by philosophers in ancient Greece for an eternal reality behind the changing world of appearances led to very different answers, as we saw in the previous chapter. The materialists thought that changeless atoms of matter were eternal, while Pythagoras and his followers believed that the entire universe, especially the heavens, was ordered according to eternal non-material principles of harmony. To understand...]]>

The search by philosophers in ancient Greece for an eternal reality behind the changing world of appearances led to very different answers, as we saw in the previous chapter. The materialists thought that changeless atoms of matter were eternal, while Pythagoras and his followers believed that the entire universe, especially the heavens, was ordered according to eternal non-material principles of harmony. To understand mathematics was to link the human mind to the divine intelligence itself, which governed the creation with a transcendent perfection and order. The Pythagoreans were more than philosophers: they formed mystical communities, shared property in common, treated men and women as equals, had vegetarian diets and believed in the transmigration of the soul. They thought that, through intellectual and moral discipline, the human mind could arrive at mathematical truths and begin to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos. They were convinced that the universe is governed by a regulating intelligence and that this same intelligence is reflected in the human mind.

Plato (428–348 BC) was strongly influenced by the Pythagoreans but went further. He generalized the notion of eternal mathematical truths to a wider vision of Forms or Ideas (Platonic Forms and Ideas are traditionally written with initial capitals), or archetypes or universals, including not only mathematics but the Forms of every object or quality, including horses, human beings, colors and goodness. These Forms or Ideas exist in an immaterial, transcendent realm, outside space and time. The cosmos is ordered by this realm that transcends it. The horses that we experience in the world are like shadows or reflections of the eternal essence of the horse, the horse Idea beyond space and time. All particular things in the world that we experience through our senses are reflections of transcendent Forms.

Plato famously compared the objects of sense experience to shadows in a cave experienced by prisoners, permanently chained so they can watch only the blank cave wall, with their backs to a fire. All they see are the shadows on the wall cast by things passing in front of the fire. In Plato’s words,

See what will naturally follow if the prisoners are released and disabused of their error. At first, when any of them is liberated and compelled suddenly to stand up and turn his neck round and walk and look toward the light, he will suffer sharp pains; the glare will distress him, and he will be unable to see the realities of which in his former state he had seen the shadows; and then conceive someone saying to him that what he saw before was an illusion but that now, when he is approaching nearer to being and his eye is turned toward more real existence, he has a clearer vision, what will be his reply? Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?

Plato used the Greek word nous to signify the rational, immortal part of the soul through which the Forms could be known. As ancient philosophy progressed, the terms logos and nous were used to signify mind, reason, intellect, organizing principle, word, speech, thought, wisdom and meaning. Nous was associated both with human reason and the universal intelligence.

Many elements of Platonic philosophy were incorporated in Christian theology, and are implicit in the opening of St. John’s gospel, which, like the rest of the New Testament, was written in Greek. “In the beginning was the Word.” “Word” with a capital W is the translation of logos. Not long before St. John’s gospel was written, the word logos took on a new significance in the Jewish world when Philo of Alexandria (20 BC–AD 50) linked it to Jewish philosophy. Philo was a Greek-educated Jew, and the official representative of the Jewish community in Alexandria to the Roman emperor Caligula. He used logos to mean an intermediary divine being who bridged the gap between God and the material world. The Platonic Ideas were located in the logos, which Philo described as God’s instrument in the creation of the universe. He compared God to a gardener forming the world according to the pattern of the logos.

In Europe from the fifteenth century onward there was a revival of Platonism, which helped prepare the way for modern science. The founding fathers of modern science, Copernicus, Galileo, Descartes, Kepler and Newton, were all essentially Platonists or Pythagoreans. They thought the business of science was to find the mathematical patterns underlying the natural world, the eternal mathematical Ideas that underlie all physical reality. As Galileo expressed it, Nature was a simple, orderly system that “acts only through immutable laws which she never transgresses.” The universe was a “book written in the mathematical language.”

Most great physicists expressed similar ideas. For example, in the nineteenth century Heinrich Hertz, after whom the unit of frequency is named, expressed it as follows:

One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own, that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers, that we get more out of them than was originally put into them.

Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity was firmly in this tradition, and Arthur Eddington, who provided the first evidence in favor of the theory, concluded that it pointed to the idea that “the stuff of the world is mind stuff … [T]he mind stuff is not spread out in space and time: these are part of the cyclic scheme ultimately derived out of it.” The physicist James Jeans took a similarly Platonic view: “[T]he universe can be best pictured … as consisting of pure thought, the thought of what, for want of a wider word, we must describe as a mathematical thinker.”

Quantum theory extended Platonism to the very heart of matter, which old-style atomists had regarded as hard, homogeneous stuff. In the words of Werner Heisenberg, one of the founders of quantum mechanics:

[M]odern physics has definitely decided for Plato. For the smallest units of matter are not physical objects in the ordinary sense of the word: they are forms, structures, or—in Plato’s sense—Ideas, which can be unambiguously spoken of only in the language of mathematics.

The traditional assumption that the universe is governed by fixed laws and constant constants is almost unquestioned. This assumption has led to a baroque elaboration of theoretical speculation, including billions of extra universes as discussed below.

]]>

1 pair of coils create M-field – the orthogonal pair tap the E-fields that change creates.

[Imagine the Tetryonic diamond EM field increasing and decreasing as he changes the M-field]

It’s not really free energy – he’s just tapping the E-field energy he’s creating with the M-field changes.

Changing M-fields create changing E-fields – it’s a stationary version of the moving magnet-conductor setup hence the name.

This might get his attention if anyone could get him to see it. hint hint

Note: What we are suggesting is that the Aether is in fact what we need to understand (but Aether from the Tetryonics Perspective to be more precise) See Vacuum Energies and the Aether, and it has never been proven that the Aether does not exist. Bearden and his other team members are quite knowledgeable, however they lack the rigid geometric understanding to properly explain how their devices actually work.

I've given up on contacting Tom Bearden, but I welcome any of you to pursue him for additional commentary upon how Tetryonics goes a great distance to explain his and Bedini's discoveries.

http://www.cheniere.org/

1 pair of coils create M-field – the orthogonal pair tap the E-fields that change creates.

[Imagine the Tetryonic diamond EM field increasing and decreasing as he changes the M-field]

It’s not really free energy – he’s just tapping the E-field energy he’s creating with the M-field changes.

Changing M-fields create changing E-fields – it’s a stationary version of the moving magnet-conductor setup hence the name.

This might get his attention if anyone could get him to see it. hint hint

Note: What we are suggesting is that the Aether is in fact what we need to understand (but Aether from the Tetryonics Perspective to be more precise) See Vacuum Energies and the Aether, and it has never been proven that the Aether does not exist. Bearden and his other team members are quite knowledgeable, however they lack the rigid geometric understanding to properly explain how their devices actually work.

I've given up on contacting Tom Bearden, but I welcome any of you to pursue him for additional commentary upon how Tetryonics goes a great distance to explain his and Bedini's discoveries.

http://www.cheniere.org/

Paraphrased from the words of:

Lt. Col. Tom Bearden U.S.Army Ret.

The shortage of energy for any emerging country that’s got to have it becomes overwhelming. They have to do whatever is necessary to get it.Unfortunately, the conventional forms of energy, oil/natural gas/coal, are not spread uniformly throughout the world. They occur in various places, and are not always found in stable areas. Someone always has control over the resources, and dictators create conflict to control ownership and group loyalty.

This becomes a great breading ground where the mechanisms that are used for most of our energy today are becoming very small or non-existent in many parts of the world.The question remains, “What are we going to do when the total need for the electrical power industry overshoots the ability to furnish it, particularly with a centralized system? You can only burn so much coal, because there’s a finite amount of it. We do have a lot of coal, but does not burn cleanly. The cleanliness of what we do becomes a big problem, and in scarce places of energy, cleanliness takes a back seat to the necessity at hand. As a result, more people die from an increase in pollution in the air.

Energy is embedded in our society in everything from our health, to the economy, and to the ability to maintain our strength militarily when it keeps us free and safe from being suppressed and overwhelmed. It’s involved in everything, even your average standard of living. We will achieve our highest standard of life as long as we strive for cheap and clean energy.

The energy problem touches every human on this planet, and it decides weather or not we have energy wars that decimate whole cultures, or whether we can, in fact, turn to alternative sources that get the job done cleanly and easily. We need more work in wind mills, solar cells, and all that we can get, but these are still not enough. The only alternative we have is ENERGY FROM THE VACUUM!

When we turn to our scientific community and ask them what can be done about these energy concerns, they will tell us that the only alternative we have are the same sources we are all familiar with.More of the same simply doesn’t cut it any more. Oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear power are the main solutions today, but the usual discussion on wind, hydro-electric, solar, and all the rest is still a worthwhile pursuit, although we would be in good measure to maintain a 15 to 20% contribution from these known alternatives. This helps around the edges, but is little help in addressing the global concerns coming our way and happening before our very eyes.

This is what we’re facing. This leads us to the large centralized power system. The terrorist threat can lay it down any time it wishes to, and we can turn around one day and recognize that the very things we’ve implemented to supply ourselves with energy goes right out the window and right down the tube. So were caught between a rock in a hard place where we’re damned if we do and we're damned if we don’t. There has to be an alternative.

This alternative must come from our scientific community. We have to take a close look at the many assumptions our mainstream scientists based their current models. Today’s model is over a hundred years old, and still assumes a material ether because it still assumes a force field in space. There’s no such thing, and our science has known this for decades. It still assumes that the vacuum (empty space) is inert, but since 1930, particle physics has declared that idea false. And since that time, physics maintains that the vacuum contains the largest energy reservoir in the universe. Physics proved that, however no one has ever changed the model.

]]>

I assume that you are a thinking person because you are reading a book with the word “Thinking” in its title. If you are a thinking person, you are a philosopher, and I ask you to join me in what I call the “Philosopher’s Agreement” as you read this book.

The Philosopher’s Agreement is a traditional agreement philosophers have observed to place the focus on ideas and not their originators.The term *ad hominem* refers to an attack made on a philosopher instead of the ideas of the philosopher, and *ad hominem* attacks of course violate the Philosopher’s Agreement.

The Philosopher’s Agreement goes much further than merely prohibiting *ad hominem* attacks — it supports the philosopher’s search for ever greater understanding. According to this agreement, you have two options when you detect a flaw in my presentation:

1. If you cannot see how to correct the flaw, it is your privilege to describe the flaw and your obligation to share any thoughts you have about how to correct the flaw.

2. If you can see how to correct the flaw, it is your obligation to describe both the flaw and your solution for correcting the flaw.

I assume that you are a thinking person because you are reading a book with the word “Thinking” in its title. If you are a thinking person, you are a philosopher, and I ask you to join me in what I call the “Philosopher’s Agreement” as you read this book.

The Philosopher’s Agreement is a traditional agreement philosophers have observed to place the focus on ideas and not their originators.The term *ad hominem* refers to an attack made on a philosopher instead of the ideas of the philosopher, and *ad hominem* attacks of course violate the Philosopher’s Agreement.

The Philosopher’s Agreement goes much further than merely prohibiting *ad hominem* attacks — it supports the philosopher’s search for ever greater understanding. According to this agreement, you have two options when you detect a flaw in my presentation:

1. If you cannot see how to correct the flaw, it is your privilege to describe the flaw and your obligation to share any thoughts you have about how to correct the flaw.

2. If you can see how to correct the flaw, it is your obligation to describe both the flaw and your solution for correcting the flaw.

I find these materials absolutely stunning in scope and precision.

]]>

I find these materials absolutely stunning in scope and precision.

"Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." Sir Oliver Lodge]]>

]]>

Meanwhile our theories or our lack of theory, our perception or our blindness, do not alter facts. The facts are there all the time, and are independent of what humanity thinks about them. For ages people were ignorant that the stars were other suns, and not mere appendages to the Earth. We are constantly closing our minds to Reality, or rather we are living among realities of which we have no apprehension. Open our eyes that we may see! Should we not ask this? Some things in the age of science we are beginning to learn which were unknown to the Ancients; but in time we too shall be Ancients, and our descendants will wonder at our blindness and stupidity. Especially perhaps at the blindness and stupidity of some of the learned - some of the scribes.

Revelation has not ceased, through it takes many forms; and those to whom perception has come must relieve their minds by utterance, and not expect to be fully understood in their day and generation. Their own knowledge, so far as it is sound, is but a step in advance; and they must have faith that humanity will take it in due time. Meanwhile they must possess their souls in patience; they need not strive nor cry; in quietness and confidence shall be their strength.

Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." Sir Oliver Lodge

]]>]]>

]]>

We find this presentation interesting because it supports the Electric Universe Model. Please read the "About" description of the video to get a better understanding of what we are suggesting.

"Tetryonic Theory strongly supports the Electric Universe's model of Electromagnetic interactions driving the physics of our Universe on all scales. A closer examination of this work will reveal how equilateral [squared] Planck energy momenta can easily extend and give shape to your current EM models and correct many of the mathematical misconceptions that have arisen over time from extrapolating math without foundation. We invite you to review the work with an open mind."

]]>

http://forallkind.tetryonictheory.com/tetryonic-economics-part-2

]]>

]]>

I briefly commented on Lee Smolin in this article concerning Tetryonics.

http://tetryonictheory.com/richard-thoughts

]]>

]]>

There a number of issues raised here: Via K.C. Abraham

1. The Primer field model of interactions, and their bowls in particular, only model the M-fields of the interactions taking place – a common problem with most experimentalists. If you look at their toroidal shaped fields and realize they are only models of M-fields you’ll notice that they match the equilateral m-fields of Tetryonics but fail to model the e-field energy that they are applying to them in order to achieve their results.

2. That said they still remain an accurate model of the processes [albeit only half the picture]

]]>There a number of issues raised here: Via K.C. Abraham

1. The Primer field model of interactions, and their bowls in particular, only model the M-fields of the interactions taking place – a common problem with most experimentalists. If you look at their toroidal shaped fields and realize they are only models of M-fields you’ll notice that they match the equilateral m-fields of Tetryonics but fail to model the e-field energy that they are applying to them in order to achieve their results.

2. That said they still remain an accurate model of the processes [albeit only half the picture]

3.Current theories struggle in many ways to account for the creation and evolution of our Universe in light of the currently observed features – the largest problem they have and the most conveniently skipped over is the FTL problem of Inflation – FTL is impossible under the tenets of relativity theory, yet it is the core mechanism for inflation the bed rock of the current model of how the Universe got to have such an homogenous CMBR radiation pattern.

4. The CMBR results from an ‘almighty’ electrical discharge from two electrodes with the longitudinal waves produced reaching out between the electrodes to collide and interact within a region between the two electrodes concerned.

5. This is the only way to produce Matter and forces in the early Universe, as you delve into Tetryonic theory in depth you will note a number of key points that firmly point to the above scenario being the most plausible mechanism for the creation of our Universe.

6. Light itself can be easily formed from the same discharge process along with Matter. [but the reverse is not true nor possible, Matter cannot be created from Light or EM waves].

7. All Matter is created from Electrostatic discharges – neutral photons and EM waves have charge arrangements that are in-correct for forming Matter – so a DC discharge is how you form Matter not from light.

8. The energy density of these primordial discharges is high enough to produce FTL velocities under E=mv^2 geometries and to result in inflation where the Vacuum energies and light produced will initially propagate at >c for a period of time and then ‘slow’ down to c when the energy densities permit.

9. The interactions that create the Matter component of our Universe are the result of longitudinal energy momenta slamming into each other at various angles – only longitudinal waves produce physical forces [Tesla] and these forces create Matter, EM fields and gravity in the nascent Universe.

10. As time progresses the region of interaction will grow in size [the Universe expands] to fill empty regions of space creating SOME of the observed CMBR pattern – this CMBR pattern can also be heavily influenced by localised regions of creation

11. If a solar system [ours] was created later we would observe the CMBR pattern only by viewing it through the local MBR bubble produced by the creation of our Solar system – any attempt to model the CMBR without taking these effects into account just leads to erroneous models and predictions – to date there have be 4 [FOUR] math models that predicted the CMBR energy level [temperature] each one was proclaimed the most accurate model possible until measures returned temperatures that differed from the model – at which point the model was re-adjusted and proclaimed to be the most accurate model again.

12. Fiddling with math to match an observed outcome is not science – it is fiddling – and should never be done. Tetryonics has littered Science with the remains of such work that has lead physics to many an erroneous conclusion – atomic models, relativity theory, gravity, the role of charge and the geometry of energy itself are but a few that come quickly to mind.

13. The Ying-Yang geometry is simply a well-known symbol that can be utilized to convey a basic message of how the Universe was created, many others are no doubt possible as well – the truth of the matter (as I see it) is far more prosaic, to make a Universe all you need is enough equilateral Planck energies compressed into two points and a region of empty space in which it can expand. Dollard has done similar experiments and noted mini-galaxies and stars in light bulbs as a result of large voltages discharges into them.

Other important points to consider.

1. Primer is experimentally based – Tetryonics is theory based.

2. Both can aid and expand on the work of each other and in fact this should be encouraged if possible

3. There is a case of strong agreement between Tetryonic theory and the Primer field experimental results.

4. We congratulate him in using EM discharges as this is where Tetryonic Theory shows our future advances lie in energy generation and resource creation.

5. Obviously his focus has been on practical results while our focus is on developing and refining a theory and one that shows great promise in expanding David's work to date.

6. Tetryonic Theory can greatly expand his understanding of the plasma physics of the discharges that he is working with presently, in turn enabling the rapid development of new experimental designs.

7. In fact, Tetryonic theory has many discharge designs that can be readily provided to further his experimental work on discharge plasmas etc.

8. CAD modeling of equilateral E&M fields shows that the electrode designs he has found effective [and was utilizing in the videos] are fully reflective of Tetryonic M field geometries, leaving scope to expand on his current theoretical modeling and suppositions through the inclusion of Tetryonic Field Theory.

9. Obviously there is scope to develop the E-field components of the fields as this is where Tesla found much application. This is where real physical forces can be easily created and real horsepower can be transmitted over great distances near-instantaneously [as Tesla noted]

10. It is only current science’s fixation on electrical oscillations & transverse waves that creates our current impediment to many new technologies that can be rapidly developed and made available to all.

11. I couldn’t agree more with his statement that practical outcomes are a necessary step – but equally, so is a solid understanding of the physics involved from a theoretical stand point. Some development of a theoretical understanding of the results and its application to current sciences was attempted in his videos but found only limited success as key pieces of theory were missing, namely that of the equilateral geometries of Planck energies and the theoretical advances made possible by Tetryonics Theory’s geometric approach to electrical energies and physics in general.

12. From a mutual understanding of each other’s work an even greater understanding can be developed as from my point of view presently there is much in common.

13. Finally, his theory being ‘limited’ to M-field at present and Tetryonics can reveal much more about the interaction dynamics taking place than he is theoretically aware of at present.”

=====

]]>]]>

There are many rifts between different types of ideological understanding plaguing the planet today. When you connect that with having to share a nation or planet with others who simply refuse to consider others point of views, we've got serious problems to deal with.

I have no hesitation admitting the deep dodo that humanity needs to deal with. The problem is that nobody feels empowered enough to stand up for what they truly believe, and there aren't many willing to actually step forward and outright state what is going on in the world at large.

In my opinion, there are dark forces at work. They are playing a finely tuned game, blackmailing all dissenters or those who even attempt to state an alternative perspective out in the open.

Well, since this site is dedicated to a new physics truth movement, the first order of business should be that of physics. But I don't want to limit this blog to strictly physics topics, because I feel there is a much bigger elephant in the room than the deception of modern science being forced upon us.

The problems that I can see are glaring all of us in the face right now, and almost everybody feels hopeless to change the way the game is played. I would like to play a part in restoring your faith in humanity and in science to address the steps that are required to change the very rules of the game. We must share this terrestrial body floating along in space, and work within ourselves to bring about a more harmonious relation with others and with our planet.

I'm here to suggest that the solutions to all our problem are available and have been here for some time now. We must collectively figure out how to cooperate with those who you completely disagree with. You're not going to change my mind, and I'm not going to change yours, but when you get down to it, we have to share our resources with a global community. We must transcend a specific part of ourselves before we can openly cooperate and share ideas with others who disagree wholeheartedly with our approach to knowledge and understanding.

So before we get the show on the road, I would like everyone to be aware that there is a growing group of people and movements that are trying with all their collective might to release truth to the world. The mainstream media won't give it to you, and you can bet that the global politicians are and will continue to conspire against you until their authority has been compromised in some way.

The growing number of solutions currently available to society has forced the hand of the elite and the Agenda 21 proponents have hit the fast forward button because they can sense the shift themselves. They are attempting to send each and every one of us back to the stone age, in hopes of preventing the Alchemical Renaissance that has already begun. If this modern Renaissance is allowed to take hold, then they will certainly lose control over the paradigm they've created.

"The Alchemical Renaissance" has already begun and I welcome you all to a new era in Scientific understanding. It will take a few years, but with this knowledge out in the world, we now have the resources, the understanding, and the teamwork to build a better civilization. One that the current elite organizations never predicted.

I'm suggesting that if some of these new emerging technologies can be released to the public across the planet there is still time that we could all experience yet another shift of humanity. The renaissance of old was but a twinkling of an eye compared to what has already been released to the world. A wealth of opportunity is inherently built into this new model of understanding and it's finally time for humanity to transform the planet for the betterment of all kind.

Looking back across the nexus of time, it will seem utterly mind boggling why or how humanity kept wearing the chains of slavery for so long. Looking back across even a short time span, say a decade, will render the past an unrecognizable hodgepodge of complete confusion, ignorance, and waist of global resources to advance the cause of but a few.

I try not to worry about what we are leaving our children and grandchildren to deal with. Rather, I work tirelessly to help spread information across the globe that could have such a profound impact on the future of this planet. I want my children to thank this generation for our courage and enthusiasm to affect real and lasting progress rather than scorn the failures of their parents and grandparents generation. This is an open invitation to do what you do best, whatever that may be. It's time for you to use your gifts in any way necessary to uplift humanity as we ascend into new territory. I am looking for others to share the responsibility and we are about to party like never before.

All you need to join our movement is to speak your truth. Don't expect others to change their thinking. What happens is that others start to simply notice the change around and within you and eventually they come around to seeing and experiencing a much larger reality than before.

I don't personally care if you agree with any of my opinions. I am beyond that. I will work with others from different cultures, religions, ideologies, and personalities if you have shown your dedication to the advancement of the human condition, helping to spread this awareness across the globe. This movement is not about convincing others to think like you or to do what you do. Rather it is an invitation to take the steering wheel into your hands, however you can do that, and work across the lines and confines of national borders, cultural understanding and any other rift associated with the beliefs that anyone of you holds dear.

We are embarking on a new journey and there will be nobody left behind. We are working for the betterment of all kind and that should never be overlooked or misunderstood.

We can provide free energy to the world, I am utterly convinced and if you are not able to see that, then you've been indoctrinated with a limiting belief system, and I offer my services to you free of charge to help uplift your spirit and take on the world with a renewed sense of purpose and exuberance.

Never, ever, underestimate your individual power, and what can happen when you couple that to even a few others who can work within the framework of cooperation beyond competition, beyond ego and beyond a core set of ideologies. I'm not sure who will respond to the call, but if you do, I am honored to welcome you aboard our ship and let us discover the future together.

The For All Kind movement starts with respect, and Truthfulness, and Honesty then follows. We operate beyond competition and are honing our skills at a new kind of cooperation. A cooperation that increases and maximized your individual purpose and influence in the world.

Greed is taken out by the knees with this model of spontaneous alignment with our True Selves, and if you've gotten this far, let me be the first to welcome you. What you make of it in the end is up to you, however know that there is assistance you never knew about available to you right now.

There is undoubtedly some time left to make these changes, but that time is being shortened by a minuscule number of individuals who know not what they do.

Never underestimate your resources.

]]>Introducing the concept of a Tetryonic 'integer' unit. We connect the dots between Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory to that of Tetryonics 'Square Numbers' in Physics, I hope to show that this new way of looking at the universe is valid and expressive in ways we need to recognize and appreciate. The future is here, right now, and we are the ones we've been waiting for. If not us, who? If not now, when?

]]>Connecting the dots between Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory to that of Tetryonics 'Square Numbers' in Physics, I hope to show that this new way of looking at the universe is valid and expressive in ways we need to recognize and appreciate. The future is here, right now, and we are the ones we've been waiting for.

"What exactly is a unit? And, by implication, a number? And how might these abstract concepts be best represented or symbolized within the jurisdiction of a language of which they form the parts? Is an 'intuitive knowing' (axiom) called for? A 'given' which must forever remain 'incompletely definable' (here alluding to Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem) because the concept of the unit lies at the heart of definitions themselves, and therefore any definition of itself must surely, ipso facto, be tautologous? We must remember that all things in our Universe (including 'definitions') are relative as required by the Principle of Universal Relativity —nothing is 'cut off' or separated, else it remains unknowable, neither may it 'influence' or 'be influenced'.

There seems little doubt we are on the threshold of a rich new expressive means in the arts and of powerful new theories in science. The adoption and further exploration of the principles outlined below may lead to the development of a highly sophisticated language—one that might be understood universally. This is because such a language would reflect universal organization in principle. Such a universal language could extend the potential for expression and communication far beyond what we currently know as art or language. The gradual elucidation of scale structures together with syntactical exploration and interconnection of these will result in the discovery of not only a powerful expressive means but also a high-order language with the ability to extend science and art, in fact thinking itself, to a level we might only dream of today.

The challenge for the new art is not only to discover resonant scale structures and syntaxes but to apply and combine these to form a new language of visual forms and events. The sign that we are on the right track in our quest will be that the new syntax and scale structures connect up in exquisite ways with many existing covert scale structures within mathematics, music, topology, linguistics, and the natural world. Ultimately, the new language will embrace them all. Then we shall know ourselves, each other, and the universe more fully.

This document is therefore but a beginning; an outline of the principles of new ways of thinking, creating, exploring. It presents a new frontier, a new challenge. My hope is that it advances not only the cause of art, but of how we think, and of what we can know. The theory stands upon the shoulders of many giants of the past, bringing together their history-making breakthroughs within a single schema. Thus the theory is both new and old. It is new in what it brings together and in how it is brought together. In addition, new concepts are proposed and these are then applied to the foundations of geometry and number theory including Pythagoras' theorem. But it is a newness that builds upon the foundation of the individual achievements of many others; a consciousness not only of human history, but of the human discovery of cosmic origins, timescales, and orders. Finally, the document presents a number of conjectures arising from the theory, and whether these are someday proven true or partly true is perhaps less important than whether the general premise of the ideas here presented proves to be valuable to peoples or persons now or in the future.

...A significant oversight and omission is thus revealed at the fundamental level of the notion of the unit in mathematics—at the very least, units pertaining to the measurement of areas - including the concept of units as taught in primary, secondary, and even (sometimes) tertiary education. [In light of the equally-triangular nature of the so-called 'square numbers']...is it not curious then, that in the history of mathematics, squares have served the role of 'general-purpose units-of-area', it would appear by default rather than design? We have applied square plugs to nearly every shaped hole under the mathematical sun. The notion of units-relative-to-wholes has not been taken up seriously perhaps because issues of comparison have tended to focus on differences more than similarities or 'resonances'. In the comparative measurement of areas, we have inducted the square as the default unit of area and a universal arbiter of comparison ('this area is so-many-square units whereas that area is a lesser number of equivalent square units, and is therefore smaller'). It is ironic because comparisons involve relating something to something else, and thus a choice of units relative to the system concerned must ultimately be simpler and more powerful. We have applied ‘square plugs’ to nearly every shaped hole under the mathematical sun....the application of relative units to mathematical and spatial problems allows a deeper understanding of qualitative differences as well as a simpler and more resonant connection of geometric problems to number theory and analysis. Thus every 'square' number can just as easily be represented in equilateral triangular form."

-- Wayne Roberts - via Scale Structure Theory

If not us, who? If not now, when?

"Every one of our laws is a purely mathematical statement using rather complex and abstruse mathematics. It's successes have fostered a tendency to forget that mathematics in NOT physics."--Abraham

We are looking at numbers from a Tetryonic perspective and connect these concepts to that of Scale Structure Theory (Wayne Roberts). We are attempting to highlight the notion that 'Square Numbers' are in fact Equilateral Triangular Geometries. The nature of Units is also called into question whereby a re-definition of the unit is necessary in order to advance our understanding of physical systems. Only when these concepts are accepted can we delve deeper into the erroneous assumptions made by the Standard Model, setting it on a path correction leading to unforeseen advances in many areas of study. By applying Equilateral Geometry to numbers, mass , Energy and Matter, a new level of understanding and a new road map for the future of science is offered.

Wayne Roberts suggests that these principles will assist to develop a new visual language leading to new ways to think about our universe. Tetryonics goes a step further and demonstrates that this is in fact true. By applying the notion of 'Square numbers' to Equilateral Triangular Geometries, Tetryonics offers a new visual language confidently resting upon the firm foundations of Geometry.

"If math is the language of Physics, then Geometry is the grammar that the math must follow."K.C.ABRAHAM

If you relate the concept of a numerical ‘Integer’ to that of a geometric energy ‘quantum’ you’ll find it's a better way of defining it as Tetryonics does in Quantum Mechanics Book One, concerning introductory math & throughout T[5] – Geometrics.

Best definition we can give is “Square numbers are in fact EQUILATERAL geometries.” This covers it all because squares are equilateral just as equilateral triangles are. In fact we’d love to just drop ‘square numbers’ from our vernacular but it is deeply ingrained [just like dodecahedrons being hexagonal etc.]. We take care to place quotes around 'square numbers' because English just isn't descriptive enough in this area, and the reference word, square, has lead us to looking at actual squares rather than realizing that the tessellation of Equilateral Geometries produce all the square numbers of physics.

Introducing the concept of a Tetryonic 'integer' unit.

The “Omega’ unit:

- The name and symbol reflect the equilateral geometry and EM field flux of all quanta

- Its foundational units would be Pi radians

- Combined with mass [Energy/sec] it gives Planck’s Constant [h] in physics

- Its geometry [m^2] per second reflects the unit of quantised angular momentum [QAM]

One ‘integer’ Omega unit is Pi radians and provides the geometric foundation for all of Physics.

The Tetryon forms the Matter quanta in physics, so we find it useful to keep everything in units of [pi] for Tetryonics. If someone was to work exclusively with EM photons [Light] no doubt it could be used to used to create an integer unit for that work [ie Photon = 2pi E] but again the results obtained would then have to be all converted back to [pi] geometries and formula so as to present their work in a base unit.

What we are trying to convey here is that 2pi [TAU] bases relate specifically to Photons – while there remains a need to express final results in terms of pi [Charge] or [4pi] Matter units for true equivalence throughout physics.

Using TAU & PI bases without a full understanding of the geometry will lead to a result similar to the Planck-Einstein one where it is often stated in textbooks that hv= E = hf . Mathematically that's the same as saying 2 =1, or Even = Odd and therefor must be corrected from this point forward, and all modern text books need to be re-written with that in mind.

While we support the premise of Tau, it too is short-sighted and fails when it comes to providing an appropriate base unit for Physics in general.

The following is the best summation of the geometric bases:

The Charged [ODD pi] geometry of 2-D [npi] mass – ENERGY [pi] - Matter [4npi]

It helps to maintain the units and equations reflective of the number of sides each particle and field has.

Specifically:

Bosons ODD pi 2D mass charge geometries

Photons EVEN pi 2D mass tau geometries

Tetryons 4pi 3D Matter Tetryonic geometry

Quarks-Lepton 12pi 3D Matter Dodecadeltahedron geometries

Mesons 24pi 3D Matter Dual -Dodecadeltahedron

Baryons 36pi 3D Matter Tri - Dodecadeltahedron

Elements 84pi 3D Matter Elemental

The [base] unit here is obviously [pi] geometries which are the radian geometries formed by QAM [OMEGA].

**To Be Continued....**

]]>

With remarks on the evasiveness of Reality by Sir Oliver Lodge as found in "Ether and Reality: A Series of Discourses on the Many Functions of the Ether of Space" 1925

----------------------------------

Yet all experience is an arch wherethro'

Gleams that untravell'd world, whose margin fades

For ever and for ever when I move.

Tennyson, Ulysses

-----------------------------------

"We live in a Universe of which we know very little: we eke out our knowledge by precarious reasoning. We are apt to confront a special instance with a generalization; as if we should try to establish the fact-otherwise doubtless certain enough-that, say, Oedipus and Moses and Elijah must have died, by the thesis, All men are mortal, and they were men. But admitting the minor premiss, how do we know that their end was not exceptional? The generalization sums up our experience, but proves nothing, i.e. adds nothing to our certainty.

An induction is helpful as a summary, but has no power over a specific instance to the contrary, if such instance were forthcoming. Proof might be based on the known liability of organic matter to degeneration: but apply this to an amoeba and it fails; a lowly organism may be killed, but it need not die. So we might argue thus: -cells may persist, a body is composed of cells, therefore it may persist. Experience disproves the conclusion, it is a non sequitur. Reasoning of a formal kind is based on generalization which may or may not be true; whereas experience can be direct and specific as well as general.

Some things there are however which evade experience, and these are apt to be excluded altogether by the inductive process on which all generalizations are founded. It should be more widely recognized that inductions may be hasty, or may be extended unduly: a single instance, well established, will upset a premature generalization. The force of prejudice, however, may be so strong as to overpower the evidence of our senses, or render us incompetent to recognize their clear indications. As if an unwary naturalist, having unconsciously assumed as a major premiss that all grass is green, might thereafter blind himself to the direct experience that the blade of grass shown him is red. Similarly, many people would insist that communication with the dead is impossible. "The dead know not anything. In that day their thoughts perish." A major premiss is usually a generalization from necessarily imperfect knowledge, an assumption which may be upset by a single authentic specific instance: it has or ought to have no force, save a cautionary one, against direct experience.

The aim of science is not mere formularies or convenient modes of expression, it is or should be truth and reality; we seek, on the evidence of our senses, to form some conception of what Reality is like. But some kinds of reality are evasive; they either never make an impression on our senses, or very seldom. What strongly appeals to us is matter -- material objects in various forms; anything else seems, or really is, a matter of inference. The inference may strike us as of doubtful validity unless we can adduce some direct sensory experience in its favour; and this evidence it may be difficult to receive or attach credence to, in the face of a uniformly established prejudice which we may dignify as a law of nature with no exceptions. So it happens that even direct experience of an exceptional instance, combined with evidence or testimony concerning many such instances, is sometimes powerless to effect conviction. Indeed persons afflicted with what psychoanalysts of the more reasonable variety might call "a materialistic complex" appear constitutionally unable to open their minds to evidence of any non-material or anti-materialistic kind. They straightway deny its authenticity. It makes no impression; they are incompetent to receive it, however cogent; though otherwise and in other directions they are mentally alert and highly qualified intellectually. They exhibit a curious kind of mental aberration or unconscious warp, and yet they are quite unconscious that their perceptive faculty is atrophied in one direction. They have been known to stigmatise as demented those who call their attention to exceptional specific occurrences. But there is no dementia on either side, there is only a kind of obsession; and the obsession is a very natural one, born of a wide knowledge, a broad basis of experience, throughout which such exceptional incidents have not occurred, or at least have not forced themselves upon attention.

We can admit that normal experience displays mind only in association with matter. It is therefore pardonable though illogical to assume that without matter mind cannot exist; in other words, that a physiological organism is an absolute necessity, not only for the display, but for the very existence, of memory, thought, and affection, not withstanding that these attributes make no pretence of being themselves physiological things. Memory is not really a function of matter, though it does seem to have a physical basis or concomitant. Love need not necessarily be associated with protoplasm. Thought is not proven to be a secretion of the brain. We have no right to make that over-hasty generalization: we ought to keep our minds open and be guided by carefully scrutinised facts. This cannot be done without patience and study; and study needs an open mind. Violent assertions, whether positive or negative, are useless, or are only useful for focussing attention: we must be guided by observed facts, not by preconceptions or past experience alone, else would new knowledge be impossible.

Similarly if we make the assertion that all bodies -- bodies of every kind -- must be composed of matter, we are speaking plausibly, but may be generalizing too hastily and leaving out of consideration the possibility that some "bodies" may be composed, either wholly or partially, of Ether. Such an idea would not have occurred to us unless the idea of Ether had been brought to our minds in a multitude of other ways, and unless we had begun to realise something of its reality and its numerous or perhaps innumerable functions. Hitherto it has been almost ignored in Philosophy. That is a defect to be remedied: it is no fault of philosophers. Physics must come to the rescue. Philosophy seeks to unify and comprehend all knowledge, and cannot afford to ignore anything -- certainly not so omnipresent and intense a reality as the Ether of Space. For to know anything thoroughly, nothing accessible must be excluded. It is only because the Ether has seemed inaccessible that it has been neglected. Neglect was inevitable until more was known about it, and hitherto Physicists have not sought to expound what in this direction they know.

Many of us are not even physicists, but just learners: such as both young and old ought to be. Young people must take things piecemeal, and be content at first to learn something about them. They cannot learn all about the, and they cannot philosophise; they do not know enough. Probably none of us know enough to philosophize effectively. Even philosophers have to do their best with less than complete knowledge; and accordingly each makes a system, with which other do not agree. Each however probably catches a glimpse of some aspects of truth, and that is why the history of Philosophy is instructive.

We can all recognize the very certain truth that to know all about any one thing we have to know about a great number of other things. Everything is interlocked; we cannot take a comprehensive survey before we look at the things individually, and we cannot consider individual things fully and completely without a comprehensive survey. Thus there is a difficulty, but it is unavoidable.

In science, as a rule, we concentrate on one aspect, and try to get that clear. Hitherto science has mainly concentrated on the purely material aspect of the Universe; while the philosopher is left to group all aspects together if he can. But there are gaps, which must depend on Science to fill up. And sometimes he has to wait, not always knowing what he is waiting for; not always knowing that there is a great deal to wait for.

Meanwhile life is short, and if we do nothing but wait, no progress is made. Progress can be made, but always tentatively, and with a sense of incompleteness. Everything excluded is a weakness. To exclude the Ether is a terrible weakness: an effort to understand the connexion between mind and matter is hopeless if we exclude the tertium quid, the essential intermediary. To exclude life and mind is another weakness: it is the basis of a materialistic system. To exclude matter is another but less common error, -the basis of a narrow idealism. To over-emphasize conduct as a test for truth is the basis of Pragmatism. To under-estimate conduct and practical affairs is Mysticism. The positive side of all these systems may be strong; the negative side is feeble and misleading.

It is rather like the old controversy between faith and works. All sides must be represented in a complete scheme; and if by reason of frailty we cannot regard all aspects together, then we must regard them piecemeal or seriatim, and there must be division of labour. My business is to emphasize the Ether, and its bearing not only on matter but on life and mind.

To this end I am preparing a book of some size; but inasmuch as the subject continually touches on familiar problems -- not those of physics and philosophy alone but those of humanity in general -- it has been thought well to broadcast and publish separately this general summary of the argument.

I do this the more readily, and with a greater sense of responsibility, because I believe that our present physical knowledge, when properly grasped and accepted, constitutes a beneficent source of power, a fertilizing influence, a body of illustration and parable, which can be drawn upon and used by those whose business it is to deal with still Higher Things. Their congregations may not know enough, they themselves may not know enough, to utilize ascertained facts to the full. If they did, -- if only they could apprehend a tithe of what is now known by specialists, -- their teaching would be suffused with a dominating sense of Reality, in the strength of which they would press froward with an energy and enthusiasm such as were aforetime evoked in one to whom a great experience had been vouchsafed, and who continued not unmindful of the Heavenly Vision. "

=====================

https://ia600305.us.archive.org/15/items/etherofspace00lodguoft/etherofspace00lodguoft.pdf

=====================

"Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." Sir Oliver Lodge

]]>

"The whole world benefits from one person’s good deed."

- The Zohar

"The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new." - Socrates

"Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.” - Plato

“Most men and women, by birth or nature, lack the means to advance in wealth or power, but all have the ability to advance in knowledge.” - Pythagoras

"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants." -- Isaac Newton

"The world is a terrible place not because of the bad things that happen but because of the good people who stand by and do nothing." --Albert Einstein

"...the scientist makes use of a whole arsenal of concepts which he imbibed practically with his mother's milk; and seldom if ever is he aware of the eternally problematic character of his concepts. He uses this conceptual material, or, speaking more exactly, these conceptual tools of thought, as something obviously, immutably given; something having an objective value of truth which is hardly even, and in any case not seriously, to be doubted. ...in the interests of science it is necessary over and over again to engage in the critique of these fundamental concepts, in order that we may not unconsciously be ruled by them." -- Albert Einstein

“Enlightenment is a destructive process. It has nothing to do with becoming better or being happier. Enlightenment is the crumbling away of untruth. It's seeing through the facade of pretense. It's the complete eradication of everything we imagined to be true.” ― Adyashanti

“ Nothing is more beautiful than to know all.” and “All of nature in its awful vastness and incomprehensible complexity is in the end interrelated - worlds within worlds within worlds: the seen and the unseen - the physical and the immaterial are all connected - each exerting influence on the next - bound, as it were, by chains of analogy - magnetic chains. Every decision, every action mirrors, ripples, reflects and echoes throughout the whole of creation. The world is indeed bound with secret knots." -- Athanasius Kircher

"Consider an intelligence which, at any instant, could have a knowledge of all the forces controlling nature together with the momentary conditions of all the entities of which nature consists. If this intelligence were powerful enough to submit all these data to analysis it would be able to embrace in a single formula the movements of the largest bodies in the universe and those of the lightest atoms; for it nothing would be uncertain; the past and future would be equally present for its eyes." -- Pierre-Simon Laplace

"The new idea is that what is permanent in these ultimate particles or small aggregates is their shape and organization...They are, as it were, pure shape, nothing but shape." -- Erwin Schrödinger

"In mathematics, as in any scientific research, we find two tendencies present. On the one hand, the tendency toward abstraction seeks to crystallize the logical relations inherent in the maze of material that is being studied, and to correlate the material in a systematic and orderly manner. On the one hand, the tendency toward intuitive understanding fosters a more immediate grasp of the objects one studies, a live rapport with them, so to speak, which stresses the concrete meaning of their relations.

As to geometry, in particular, the abstract tendency has here led to the magnificent systematic theories of Algebraic Geometry, of Riemannian Geometry, and of Topology; these theories make extensive use of abstract reasoning and symbolic calculation in the sense of algebra.

Notwithstanding this, it is still as true today as it ever was that intuitive understanding plays a major role in geometry. And such concrete intuition is of great value not only for the research worker, but also for anyone who wishes to study and appreciate the results of research in geometry." -- David Hilbert -- "Geometry and the imagination"

"Electricity is often called wonderful, beautiful; but it is so only in common with the other forces of nature. The beauty of electricity or of any other force is not that the power is mysterious, and unexpected, touching every sense at unawares in turn, but that it is under law, and that the taught intellect can even govern it largely. The human mind is placed above, and not beneath it, and it is in such a point of view that the mental education afforded by science is rendered super-eminent in dignity, in practical application and utility; for by enabling the mind to apply the natural power through law, it conveys the gifts of God to man." -- Michael Faraday

"Perhaps I may be allowed a parable, and say that similarly it is customary to ignore or to deny the existence of a spiritual world. As with the Ether, so we are painfully unaware of such an influence, we are blind and deaf to its reality: we are really stupid in our self-satisfaction and narrowness of outlook. Most of us apprehend little more than the animals: we go on with no more knowledge than is necessary for daily life: and it is rather the fashion to despise those who seek to enlighten us. There has always been a tendency to deny and contemn the pioneers of knowledge: all knowledge has to make its way slowly and painfully against a mass of prejudice and inertia. To a certain degree this may be wise: to accept things too readily would be rash: unbalance and enthusiastic credulity is always to be deprecated: it is better to be slow in accepting the truth than to be ready to accept falsehood. A certain amount of opposition is salutary; though there comes a point at which opposition to truth ceases to be beneficial and becomes mere obscurantism. Opinions may differ as to when that stage is reached in any given case.

Meanwhile our theories or our lack of theory, our perception or our blindness, do not alter facts. The facts are there all the time, and are independent of what humanity thinks about them. For ages people were ignorant that the stars were other suns, and not mere appendages to the Earth. We are constantly closing our minds to Reality, or rather we are living among realities of which we have no apprehension. Open our eyes that we may see! Should we not ask this? Some things in the age of science we are beginning to learn which were unknown to the Ancients; but in time we too shall be Ancients, and our descendants will wonder at our blindness and stupidity. Especially perhaps at the blindness and stupidity of some of the learned - some of the scribes.

Revelation has not ceased, through it takes many forms; and those to whom perception has come must relieve their minds by utterance, and not expect to be fully understood in their day and generation. Their own knowledge, so far as it is sound, is but a step in advance; and they must have faith that humanity will take it in due time. Meanwhile they must possess their souls in patience; they need not strive nor cry; in quietness and confidence shall be their strength.

Reality is what everyone is keen to know about. No one wants to be deceived; all are eager for trustworthy information, if it be forthcoming, about both the material and the spiritual worlds, which together seem to constitute the Universe." -- Sir Oliver Lodge

"Quantum theory, while extending atomism almost limitlessly, has at the same time plunged it into a crisis that is severer than most people are prepared to admit. On the whole the present crisis in modern basic science points to the necessity of revising its foundations down to very early layers." -- Erwin Schrödinger

"It is probably true quite generally that in the history of human thinking the most fruitful developments frequently take place at those point where two different lines of thought meet. These lines may have their roots in quite different parts of human culture, in different times or different cultural environments or different religious traditions: hence if they actually meet, that is, if they at lease so much relate to each other that a real interaction can take place, then one may hope that new and interesting developments may follow." -- Werner Heisenberg

"The gross structure of many of the familiar systems observed in nature is determined by a relatively small number of universal constants. Had these constants taken different numerical values from those observed, then these systems would differ correspondingly in their structure. What is especially interesting is that, in many cases, only a modest alteration of values would result in a drastic restructuring of the system concerned." -- Paul Davies

"There seems little doubt we are on the threshold of a rich new expressive means in the arts and of powerful new theories in science. The adoption and further exploration of the principles outlined below may lead to the development of a highly sophisticated language—one that might be understood universally.

This is because such a language would reflect universal organization in principle. Such a universal language could extend the potential for expression and communication far beyond what we currently know as art or language.

The gradual elucidation of scale structures together with syntactical exploration and interconnection of these will result in the discovery of not only a powerful expressive means but also a high-order language with the ability to extend science and art, in fact thinking itself, to a level we might only dream of today.The challenge for the new art is not only to discover resonant scale structures and syntaxes but to apply and combine these to form a new language of visual forms and events.

The sign that we are on the right track in our quest will be that the new syntax and scale structures connect up in exquisite ways with many existing covert scale structures within mathematics, music, topology, linguistics, and the natural world. Ultimately, the new language will embrace them all. Then we shall know ourselves, each other, and the universe more fully.This document is therefore but a beginning; an outline of the principles of new ways of thinking, creating, exploring. It presents a new frontier, a new challenge. My hope is that it advances not only the cause of art, but of how we think, and of what we can know.

The theory stands upon the shoulders of many giants of the past, bringing together their history-making breakthroughs within a single schema. Thus the theory is both new and old. It is new in what it brings together and in how it is brought together. In addition, new concepts are proposed and these are then applied to the foundations of geometry and number theory including Pythagoras' theorem. But it is a newness that builds upon the foundation of the individual achievements of many others; a consciousness not only of human history, but of the human discovery of cosmic origins, timescales, and orders.

Finally, the document presents a number of conjectures arising from the theory, and whether these are someday proven true or partly true is perhaps less important than whether the general premise of the ideas here presented proves to be valuable to peoples or persons now or in the future.

What exactly is a unit? And, by implication, a number? And how might these abstract concepts be best represented or symbolized within the jurisdiction of a language of which they form the parts? Is an 'intuitive knowing' (axiom) called for? A 'given' which must forever remain 'incompletely definable' (here alluding to Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem) because the concept of the unit lies at the heart of definitions themselves, and therefore any definition of itself must surely, ipso facto, be tautologous? We must remember that all things in our Universe (including 'definitions') are relative as required by the Principle of Universal Relativity —nothing is 'cut off' or separated, else it remains unknowable, neither may it 'influence' or 'be influenced'.

A significant oversight and omission is thus revealed at the fundamental level of the notion of the unit in mathematics—at the very least, units pertaining to the measurement of areas - including the concept of units as taught in primary, secondary, and even (sometimes) tertiary education.

Thus every 'square' number can just as easily be represented in equilateral triangular form.

[In light of the equally-triangular nature of the so-called 'square numbers'] ..is it not curious then, that in the history of mathematics, squares have served the role of 'general-purpose units-of-area', it would appear by default rather than design?

We have applied square plugs to nearly every shaped hole under the mathematical sun. The notion of units-relative-to-wholes has not been taken up seriously perhaps because issues of comparison have tended to focus on differences more than similarities or 'resonances'. In the comparative measurement of areas, we have inducted the square as the default unit of area and a universal arbiter of comparison ('this area is so-many-square units whereas that area is a lesser number of equivalent square units, and is therefore smaller'). It is ironic because comparisons involve relating something to something else, and thus a choice of units relative to the system concerned must ultimately be simpler and more powerful.

...the application of relative units to mathematical and spatial problems allows a deeper understanding of qualitative differences as well as a simpler and more resonant connection of geometric problems to number theory and analysis." -- Wayne Roberts - Scale Structure Theory

“To my mind there must be, at the bottom of it all, not an equation, but an utterly simple idea. And to me that idea, when we finally discover it, will be so compelling, so inevitable, that we will say to one another, Oh, how beautiful. How could it have been otherwise?” and "Some day a door will surely open and expose the glittering central mechanism of the world in its beauty and simplicity." - John Archibald Wheeler

"At present, we imagine all space to be filled by a superposition of fields, each named after an elementary particle—electrons, protons, various kinds of mesons, etc. As new species proliferate, it becomes more and more desirable that future theory, if it resembles the present one at all, should contain but a single field, with the present types of matter corresponding to different modes of excitation of it." - David Park

"If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things." -- Rene Descartes

"Where you turn Science into Dogma...Is when you "Lock-in" on a given Model...You assume your Model is perfect...and therefore anything that does not agree with that model can not possibly exist in Nature..." -- Tom Bearden

"Everybody is entitled to their own opinions but Nobody is entitled to their own facts."--Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Mathematicians...do not even need to know what they are talking about.”...and..."There is a pleasure in recognizing old things from a new point of view. Also there are problems for which the new point of view offers a distinct advantage." -- Richard Feynman

"You ask me if an ordinary person by studying hard would get to be able to imagine these things like I imagine. Of Course!..I was an ordinary person who studied hard. There is no miracle people. It just happened they got interested in these things and they learned all these stuff. They’re just people!!There is no talent special miracle ability to understand quantum mechanics or a miracle ability to imagine electromagnetic fields that comes without practice and reading and learning and mathematics. So if you say you take an ordinary person whose willing to devote a great deal of time on studying and thinking and mathematics and so on. Then he’s become a scientist!" - Richard Feynman

'The history of theoretical physics is a record of the clothing of mathematical formula which were right, or very nearly right, with physical interpretations which were often ver badly wrong.' - Jeans

“We have to be able to recognize that the attainment of knowledge is the highest labor of mankind. And that the attainment of knowledge is the basis of all philanthropy, the basis of all unselfishness, the basis of all cooperation, and the strengthening of all the constructive emotions of the human being.

Therefore to do this, it must be a discipline. And all ancient people set aside certain disciplines for those who wanted to know the truth more than anything else. These they called the mystery schools. The greatest of all wisdom is the love of truth, the love of reality.

We’ve had years of years of corrupted wisdom. We’ve head years of years of pseudo knowledge and we’re now very much in need of the real thing.” -- Manly P. Hall

"Any path is only a path, and there is no affront, to oneself or to others, in dropping it if that is what your heart tells you . . . Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary. Then ask yourself, and yourself alone, one question . . . Does this path have
a heart? If it does, the path is good; if it doesn’t it is of no use." -- Carfos Castaneda, The Teachings of Don juan

"Increasing numbers of people will recognize what is today still widely disputed, that spiritual science does not in the least degree detract from religious sensibility, from the religious life of man, but on the contrary seeks to form a bond that will again unite scientific man with the mysteries that are accessible to him through religious revelation. True spiritual science is not in any sense opposed to natural science, nor can it estrange anyone from religious life.” -- Rudolf Steiner

"The combination of mathematics and theology, which began with Pythagoras, characterized religious philosophy in Greece, in the Middle Ages, and in modern times down to Kant . . . In Plato, St Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz there is an intimate blending of religion and reasoning, of moral aspiration with logical admiration of what is timeless, which comes from Pythagoras, and distinguishes the intellectualized theology of Europe from the more straightforward mysticism of Asia." -- Bertrand Russell

“Think for yourself, Question authority. Throughout human history, as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are, or where we are going in this ocean of chaos, it has been the authorities, the political, the religious, the educational authorities who attempted to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations, informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself. Think for yourself. Question authority.” -- Timothy Leary

"It's most important of all to question authority. It's very clear, if we look at the history of science, that the great advances have always been made against the background of enormous resistance from the 'Establishment.' If we just blindly accept what the so called authorities tell us, then we will never make any kind of progress in ideas. It's essential to keep an open mind to all possibilities and not to be bound down by theories and ideas put forward by an entrenched establishment who have a vested interest in those very theories and ideas." - Graham Hancock

"To be rich is to give; to give nothing is to be poor; to live is to love; to love nothing is to be dead; to be happy is to devote oneself; to exist only for oneself is to damn oneself, and to exile oneself to hell." - Eliphas Levi

"One day all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and the truth will once again triumph." - Dr. Joseph Goebbels

“No one lights a lamp in order to hide it behind the door: the purpose of light is to create more light, to open people’s eyes, to reveal the marvels around.” - Paulo Coelho

"We gravitate and relate to geometric forms and images - not because its a logical expression of beauty - but because its an intrinsic expression of consciousness." - Rene Cormier

"We have reached a time when physics is no longer physical. The failure of the central equations has forced the entire field into mysticism. Modern physicists have found that mysticism sells better than science. The public has always been more interested in magic than in physics. They love to hear about spooky forces and time travel and backward causality and quantum tunneling, multiple dimensions and wormholes. Rigor and logic mean less than nothing to most people.

Fake physics also creates more jobs than real physics would, since we only need one person to write a good equation, but hundreds of people can be included in finessing bad equations for each new real or thought experiment. Entire sub-fields of variations and violations and quantum fudging can be created, and have been created. This eventually spun out into string theory, which is just a massive sub-field of quantum fudging, one composed entirely of fudge. Almost nothing in new physics is connected to reality in any way, by even the slenderest of threads. Every new paper is just someone's fantasy, dreamed up in front of a computer screen and surrounded by great enveloping clouds of magician's math.

You all know this is true, so don't bother denying it. If you have any nut of a conscience, any residue of real science remaining in you, you job is not to deny it, but to get busy correcting it. It is never too late to get on the right path. Gamow and Bohr and Born and Pauli and Heisenberg and even Feynman are long dead and cannot harm you. Their ghosts are being flogged for their sins to science in some parallel universe or grubby wormhole. But there is work to be done: I suggest we do it." - Miles Mathis

Existence and the ordinary turmoil of life, the struggle and the confusion which sooner or later binds consciousness by manifold links to an unevolved infantile and emotional attitude towards life, creat anxiety and deep-seated fears. We entertain fear for the morrow and in the face of the unexpected. Fear and anxiety give rise in early life to automatisms and compulsive behaviour, to what might be called a shrinkage of the sphere of consciousness. It sets up an involuntary habitual contraction of the ego instead of a full-hearted easy acceptance of whatever may come in life, be it joy or sorrow, pain or pleasure. Continues sufficiently long, this attitude develops into mental rigidity, into a closed and crystallized conscious outlook, complacent and narrow, in which all further growth is impossible. Apart, from this, many people become fixed and hidebound for quite other reasons - becoming over-attached to traditional and unoriginal modes of thinking and feeling. The result is that all spontaneity of intellect and feeling is thoroughly eliminated from the realm of possibility. It is a sacrifice which entails the death of all that is creative within. The individual becomes enclosed within an iron cage of his own construction - forged through fear of life.From this, there seems no escape. No doubt consciousness becomes developed to a very high degree, to the point where it becomes clear, inventive, and trenchant. It becomes so, however at the expense of life itself. Such a development is at the expense of flexibility and elasticity. Its cost is the loss of all that the underlying any dynamic unconscious aspect of the psyche implies - warmth, depth of feeling, inspiration, and ease of life and living. Too great a price to be paid." -- Israel Regardie

"There is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about this energy, but that its existence and potential use has been discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or more." – Dr. Theodor C. Loder III

====================================

Tesla Quotes

“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

"The mind is sharper and keener in seclusion and uninterrupted solitude. No big laboratory is needed in which to think. Originality thrives in seclusion free of outside influences beating upon us to cripple the creative mind. Be alone, that is the secret of invention; be alone, that is when ideas are born. That is why many of the earthly miracles have had their genesis in humble surroundings."

"Like a wave in the physical world, in the infinite ocean of the medium which pervades all, so in the world of organisms, in life, an impulse started proceeds onward, at times, may be, with the speed of light, at times, again, so slowly that for ages and ages it seems to stay, passing through processes of a complexity inconceivable to men, but in all its forms, in all its stages, its energy ever and ever integrally present.

A single ray of light from a distant star falling upon the eye of a tyrant in bygone times may have altered the course of his life, may have changed the destiny of nations, may have transformed the surface of the globe, so intricate, so inconceivably complex are the processes in Nature. In no way can we get such an overwhelming idea of the grandeur of Nature than when we consider, that in accordance with the law of the conservation of energy, throughout the Infinite, the forces are in a perfect balance, and hence the energy of a single thought may determine the motion of a universe.”

"We wind a simple ring of iron with coils; we establish the connections to the generator, and with wonder and delight we note the effects of strange forces which we bring into play, which allow us to transform, to transmit and direct energy at will.”

“I do not rush into actual work. When I get a new idea, I start at once building it up in my imagination, and make improvements and operate the device in my mind. When I have gone so far as to embody everything in my invention, every possible improvement I can think of, and when I see no fault anywhere, I put into concrete form the final product of my brain.”

“I can never forget the first sensations I experienced when it dawned upon me that I had observed something possibly of incalculable consequences to mankind. I felt as though I were present at the birth of a new knowledge or the revelation of a great truth."

“My first observations positively terrified me as there was present in them something mysterious, not to say supernatural, and I was alone in my laboratory at night; but at that time the idea of these disturbances being intelligently controlled signals did not yet present itself to me."

“The changes I noted were taking place periodically and with such a clear suggestion of number and order that they were not traceable to any cause known to me."

“I was familiar, of course, with such electrical disturbances as are produced by the sun, Aurora Borealis, and earth currents, and I was as sure as I could be of any fact that these variations were due to none of these causes."

“The nature of my experiments precluded the possibility of the changes being produced by atmospheric disturbances, as has been rashly asserted by some. It was sometime afterward when the thought flashed upon my mind that the disturbances I had observed might be due to an intelligent control."

“Although I could not at the time decipher their meaning, it was impossible for me to think of them as having been entirely accidental. The feeling is constantly growing on me that I had been the first to hear the greeting of one planet to another. A purpose was behind these electrical signals.”

“The signals are too strong to have travelled the great distances from Mars to Earth"

“So I am forced to admit to myself that the sources must come from somewhere in nearby space or even the moon. I am certain however, that the creatures that communicate with each other every night are not from Mars, or possibly from any other planet in our solar system.”

================

ABRAHAM QUOTES BELOW

"For any physical model to be valid it must demonstrate the known facts."

"Ultimately the inventive theories of Einstein and his school, like the inventive theories of Aristotle, will accumulate too many ad hoc modifications—too many epicycles, we may say—and they will have to give way to theories, derived inductively, that are both mathematically and conceptually correct."

"...namely physics and maths are not one and the same thing; whilst you can model physics with (some) math, you cannot and should not use just any maths to model physics."

"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."

"The Pythagorean equation is at the core of much of geometry, it links geometry with algebra, and is the foundation of trigonometry. Without it, accurate surveying, mapmaking, and navigation would be impossible, but its application to the energy-momenta geometries of Electromagnetic fields and Matter in motion in Physics is erroneous and must be corrected for science to advance."

"What's been missing from the Standard Model of physics today, as it's been developed, is a tangible geometry in order to further develop a lot of our math. The current math at the moment relies on Gaussian formulations, where 4[pi] geometries are assumed to be spherical just like planets and stars. What Tetryonics will show and further elaborate on, is that the geometry, or the [pi] geometry of energy is in fact equilateral triangles. It's the tessellation or joining together of these equilateral triangles that creates the quantum mechanics that we formulate our math on."

"It will take years for the scientific community to read and comprehend my work as they will be relearning the basics of physics. I see no reason why others willing to open their minds to new information and keen to understand the workings of the Universe should be delayed in doing so just because a few academics wish to hold things up while they wrap their heads around the basics.

And neither will I sign away my copyrights in order to publish or hide my work behind a Journal's paywall so they can charge a ridiculous [and to some prohibitive] price just to access the work.

My work is and always will be provided freely for the masses. As I said before I do what I do for very good reasons. Perhaps one day, if you a scientific breakthrough of your own, you will come to appreciate the disincentives of the 'system' that so many ardently promote.

New scientific advances should be shared freely, not patented, sequestered and/or used to extort money from people.

Tetryonic Theory strongly supports the Electric Universe's model of Electromagnetic interactions driving the physics of our Universe on all scales. A close examination of this work will reveal how equilateral [squared] Planck energy momenta can easily extend and give shape to our current EM models and correct many of the mathematical misconceptions that have arisen over time from extrapolating math without foundation. We invite you to review the work with an open mind."

“What a piece of work is a man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving, how
express and admirable in action, how like an angel, in apprehension, how like a god.” W. Shakespeare

"But there were always a few faithful souls who kept alive the Flame, tending it carefully, and not allowing its light to become extinguished. And thanks to these staunch hearts, and fearless minds, we have the truth still with us. The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.”

The Kybalion

One corrective measure is to set up some kind of an agency, under scientific society, university, or government auspices, which would undertake the task of giving a preliminary hearing to new scientific proposals, not as a matter of coming to a decision as to their merits, but merely to determine...

]]>One corrective measure is to set up some kind of an agency, under scientific society, university, or government auspices, which would undertake the task of giving a preliminary hearing to new scientific proposals, not as a matter of coming to a decision as to their merits, but merely to determine whether or not they appear to be worth more extended consideration by the scientific community.

This kind could provide a remedy for one of the most serious weaknesses of the present system, which stems from the fact that the originator of a new idea normally has no opportunity to present a rebuttal to any adverse opinion that is reached, unless he already has an established standing which enables him to secure publication irrespective of adverse opinions. For the ordinary investigator, the decision of the “authority” in the particular field, or of the publication committee or the book publisher’s advisor, is essentially final. A favorable decision by such an agency would not be in any sense an endorsement of the 25 idea; it would simply state that, in the opinion of the agency staff, the new idea has enough merit of one kind or another to justify further and more detailed examination by the scientific profession at large.

Every significant new experimental discovery should initiate a scaled review of all portions of existing theory that are in any way affected so that errors of interpretation and extrapolation can and will be detected before so many years of effort have been wasted in following false trails.

Another move might be the establishment of a new profession, that of scientific critic, analogous to music or literary critics: individuals who are not performers themselves, but who make a business of passing considered judgment on theories put forward by others. What the research worker needs is not this clear picture of today’s best guess that he gets from the ordinary textbook, but a frank and honest presentation of the basic elements of the theoretical structure, so that he can know which of these elements he must necessarily accept and which are open to possible modification if his findings seem to require some change.

A good professional dramatic critic is a better judge of a theatrical performance than a good actor, and a good professional scientific critic would be a better judge of a scientific theory than a good theorist, for exactly the same reasons.

The existence of some type of independent first tier professional appraisal and critique in the scientific field would go a long way toward minimizing the undesirable and detrimental practices, and would greatly facilitate such projects as the development of a new and better atomic theory.

Certainly it would be extremely helpful to the innovator to have his new and unconventional ideas appraised by someone who welcomes the opportunity of making such an appraisal and who has no personal axe to grind, rather than, as at present, being completely at the mercy of individuals who prefer not to be bothered with making the appraisal at all, and whose personal interests are strongly identified with maintaining the existing structure of scientific thought intact.

New ideas are the most important raw material of scientific progress, and the procedures of Science should be so set up that development of such ideas is not opposed or passively accepted, but actively and positively encouraged.

Science is not properly organized unless and until it sets up procedures which insure prompt recognition of meritorious new ideas even if they are poorly expressed, timidly presented, and without adequate factual support at the time they first appear.

It is the scientific community, acting through whatever agencies are required, that should display the aggressiveness—actively seeking out and encouraging new developments rather than accepting only those that force their way in—and it is the scientific community that should be quick to perceive the value of any new thought that is advanced, regardless of whether or not it agrees with established theories. "--Abraham

For a free download of the entire 27 page article, we invite you to download "Important Points in Science" written by K.C. Abraham.

There is a growing number of people that are simply fed up with the status quo, and we are offering something of a completely new wave of team work that stands to reach our goals through the efforts of cooperation and collaboration of the kind this world has never seen before.

Whether you are for us or against us is of no concern. FORALLKIND will be talked about, for we support thinking outside the box and challenging the mainstream world of accepted theories. What must be stressed however is that everyone carries a piece of this puzzle around with them, and we are looking to put the pieces back together in such a way as to effectively reset this reality construct we find ourselves in.

]]>My name is Richard and I've been searching for a new mode of human expression where cooperation trumps competition and where working together and respecting all kind is at the forefront of our minds.

We are a group of independent researchers in the field of science, and the tribe is starting to come together.

Anyone in service to truth is a worthy candidate to join our Task Forces which have set out to literally reset the construct of reality, the conscious mode of operation and reality we find ourselves in.

Welcome to a new era in scientific understanding.

In affiliation with http://ForAllKind.com

http://forallkind-news.weebly.com/

http://www.forallkind.com/#!task-force-2/c1nf3

http://www.forallkind.com/#!collaboration/cp7n

http://www.forallkind.com/#!united-think-tanks/c1uzd

http://www.forallkind.com/#!no-limits-for-all-kind-initiative/c1gos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd614bK3WZc

http://www.quanthomme.info/jlnlabs/bingofuel/html/bfrcl.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikCvbkzAASk

http://www.20thfleet.org.uk/index.html

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/activity.php

OR

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/forum.php?

http://www.mountainman.com.au/p_stowe.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4

http://planet.infowars.com/science/the-equilateral-geometry-of-energy-with-tetryonics

http://aetherforce.com/geometry-of-tetryonics/

]]>

In affiliation with http://ForAllKind.com

http://forallkind-news.weebly.com/

http://www.forallkind.com/#!task-force-2/c1nf3

http://www.forallkind.com/#!collaboration/cp7n

http://www.forallkind.com/#!united-think-tanks/c1uzd

http://www.forallkind.com/#!no-limits-for-all-kind-initiative/c1gos

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post2224863.html#p2224863

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd614bK3WZc

http://www.quanthomme.info/jlnlabs/bingofuel/html/bfrcl.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikCvbkzAASk

http://www.20thfleet.org.uk/index.html

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/activity.php

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/forum.php?

http://www.chavaenergy.com/

http://www.quantumgravityresearch.org/

http://www.mountainman.com.au/p_stowe.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4

http://planet.infowars.com/science/the-equilateral-geometry-of-energy-with-tetryonics

http://aetherforce.com/geometry-of-tetryonics/

http://alt-nrg.org/

http://explorationscience.org/EtherPhysics.htm

http://www.forallkind.com/#!collaboration/cp7n

http://www.forallkind.com/#!united-think-tanks/c1uzd

http://www.forallkind.com/#!no-limits-for-all-kind-initiative/c1gos

http://apibernik.wix.com/sapiedelic-centre#!news/c12no

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd614bK3WZc

http://www.quanthomme.info/jlnlabs/bingofuel/html/bfrcl.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikCvbkzAASk

http://stargrail.co.uk/2.html

http://www.20thfleet.org.uk/index.html

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/

OR

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/forum.php?

http://www.chavaenergy.com/

http://www.hyiq.org/

Forum Postings

http://garagehacker.com/index.php/topic/24-tetryonics-introduction/

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1226.0

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1233.0

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=1670

http://www.energyscienceforum.com/activity.php

http://www.mountainman.com.au/p_stowe.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4

Rex Research

http://www.rexresearch.com/

Intro Into Synergetics

http://www.grunch.net/synergetics/synintro.html

The unification of all these scientists and more is now at hand!

Euclid

Plato

Galileo

Newton

Kepler

Ruder Boskovic

Gottfried Leibniz

Simeon Poisson

Max Planck

Hendrik Lorentz

Joseph Henry

Michael Faraday

James Clerk Maxwell

Jean-Baptiste Biot

Felix Savart

Michael Faraday

Carl Friedrich Gauss

Andre-Marie Ampere

Charles-Augustin de Coulomb

James Watt

Jon Henry Poynting

Benjamin Franklin

James Prescott Joule

Georg Simon Ohm

Louis de Broglie

Werner Heisneberg

Erwin Schrodinger

John Stewart Bell

Albert Einstein

Leonhard Euler

Wyn Evans

Thomas Young

Johann Ritter

William Herschel

Charles Wheatstone

Nikola Tesla

Heinrich Hertz

Arthur Compton

Johannes Rydberg

Johann Balmer

Wilhelm Wien

Theodore Lyman

Friedrich Paschen

Frederick Sumner Brackett

August Herman Pfund

Curtis J. Humphreys

Richard Feynman

Arnold Summerfeld

Boris Yakovlevich Podolsky

Nathan Rosen

Wayne Roberts

Niels Bohr

Friedrich Hund

Wolfgang Pauli

Fredrich August Kekul

Josef Loschmidt

Archibald Couper

Michaelson

Morley

Peter Higgs

Stanley Pons

Martin Fleischmann