Basic Breakthrough and Beyond

Tetryonic theory is a brand new geometric re-interpretation of the maths of modern physics, it is based on the foundational postulate that Planck energy momenta has an equilateral geometry [resulting from its quantized angular momenta - m^2/s].

From this foundational postulate I have corrected the existing physics and mathematical assumptions and developed new models of the charged quantum geometries of EM fields/force carriers [bosons] and all the 3D matter topologies [fermions] in turn unifying and uniting QM, QED, Chemistry, Biology and Cosmology into one coherent ‘theory of everything’.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Guerilla Open Access Manifesto

July 2008, Eremo, Italy

“Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves. The world’s entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of

private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? You’ll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But

even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything up until now will have been lost.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them? Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to children in the Global South? It’s outrageous and unacceptable.

"I agree,” many say, “but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it’s perfectly legal — there’s nothing we can do to stop them.” But there is something we can, something that's

already being done: we can fight back.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by the publishers and sharing them with your friends.

But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It’s called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn’t immoral — it’s a moral imperative. Only

those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.

Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who

can make copies.

There is no justice in following unjust laws. It’s time to come into the light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public culture.

We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with the world. We need to take stuff that’s out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific

journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access.

With enough of us, around the world, we’ll not just send a strong message opposing the privatization of knowledge — we’ll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us? “       Aaron Swartz  [1986-2013]

 

Tetryonics will, and has done so by reserving the copyrights to a new unified understanding of the mechanics of our Universe and releasing this information freely to the entire World so all may benefit from this major advance in scientific knowledge..    thus preventing those who would attempt to patent and sequester such knowledge at the expense of others from doing so…..   ABRAHAM [2008]



Defining Matter and antiMatter by the nett ELEMENTARY charges of particles is problematic

While the electron is negative - the proton is positive so who is to say that we are Matter [it is only our definition of us being comprised of Matter that defines us to be so - with no real understanding of the role of charge in this matter - after all antimatter only came into existence in the 1950’s once PAM Dirac realised that the universe is made of two charges and should be accounted for mathematically]

On the basis of Protons being positive [+] and so as they are greater in mass we are antiMatter it could be easily argued that positive charges are positive Matter and negative charges [electrons and anti-protons] are what constitute anti-Matter [or vice versa]

In which case Matter and antiMatter are mirror forms of each other - which is how they are defined under mathematical treatise and equations with scant regard to the actual quantum charge distributions that comprise them.

The current definitions of what is Matter and antimatter based on charge are simply lacking… and ultimately fail as electrons [- Matter] are attracted to protons [+ Matter] and equally positrons [+] are attracted to anti-Protons [- Matter]…. making Matter and antiMatter interchangeable depending on your definition

Note also that irrespective of whether a particle is Matter [Proton/electron], antiMatter [Negatron/positron] or even Neutronium [Neutron/neutrino] they emit exactly the same photons of light making it impossible to differentiate one form from another at a distance…

AND Matter does NOT annihilate antimatter upon contact [Mesons and Pions are evidence of this ‘fact’  being wrong - even if physicists conveniently ignore it while continuing to promote Matter -antiMatter annihilation as a physical reality]

Rest assured Tetryonic theory and its charge geometry will never lie to you in such a way….

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

CP Violation explanation and Baryon asymmetry: The QAM of physics is the source of all the ‘squared’ numbers found in the maths of and the asymmetric distribution of equilateral Planck quanta within EM fields [bosons] and Matter topologies [Fermions] is what creates the conundrum of CP violation and Baryon asymmetry in modern physics Modern physics has no explanation of how CHARGE is formed at the quantum level or the physical quantum processes that creates it – and still to this day relies on ‘virtual particle’ interactions to explain the mechanics of charge field interactions.

CHARGE at the quantum level is the asymmetrical distribution of equilateral Planck energy momentahttps://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/c2KewY6AgQ3https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/1Uxo49U5Q9m

(it’s not the old chestnut of Einstein’s SR Lorentz distortion of point particle geometries in motion) And it plays a critical [but hitherto unsuspected] role in the creation of 3D Matter topologies from fields of 2d mass-energy momenta at the quantum scale:https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/4ZwCTY49jtihttps://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/AGCfEESqevz [electron]https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/NhJ5JsQQMPq [proton]https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/4anrZM84izw [neutron] and their antimatter equivalents:https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/DnLaBH5ho7K   [positron]https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/LFVYC87ZFzw  [anti-neutron]https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/1N9JGenQPf3  [anti-proton] In fact here is the full table of all bosons and fermions of the standard model and include the fundamental particles they have missed [tetryons]…..https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0xb7kQORMdDaDZUbXVNREREWVU&authuser=0

(Much more detail is available on all particle topologies in my QM eBook explaining the formation of Matter and antimatter from mass-energies [providing detailed illustrations and explanations of the final topologies of each particle along with their charge distributions, exact rest and relativistic mass-energy, momenta for each particle]

https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/4ZwCTY49jti

As to the asymmetric distribution of Matter and antimatter in our Universe – it is not down to 1 trillion antimatter particle interacting with 10 Trillion+1 Matter particles to leave just 1 Matter particle to form all the Matter we see in our current observable universe [what a laugh]

https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/3vxQna8m24n

It is the result of modern physics not realising or understanding that every Planck quantum has both a positive and negative charge on either side of its equilateral mass energy momenta [mass OMEGA = h] geometry which upon their interaction [weak and strong forces] creates a 3D Matter topology of which we can only observe and measure the external charges of [leaving the internal antimatter charge components to be forever hidden inside its closed volume topology until the Matter topology is collapsed to release its mass-energies as neutral charge heat and light photons]

https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/G9FM3ZXzzrChttps://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/SM9EZSg2pNYhttps://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/hZfZDfqA3boTetryonics – unifying and advancing science through geometry…


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Wayne Roberts Stuff.....
"The units of mathematics, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, the equations and units of physics, the 'constants' of nature ... revisions at the very foundations of science are the logical conclusions to be drawn from the theory. The very concept of numbers themselves and of what constitutes 'irrationality' in number is turned around and reexamined from new perspectives.

The parabolic lens of the theory has a focal point: an irresistible synchronicity of forms, communication, and logic." ~ Wayne Roberts - Scale Structure Theory

Not everyone can appreciate quotes, but I find them insightful especially when independent minds touch upon common themes. That's what I've found in Wayne Roberts mathematical approach. Tetryonics takes it's own approach, but they seem to confirm the analysis from more than one perspective.

This is bridge building. Tetryonics does not require Pythagoras, Athanasius Kircher, or Wayne Robers, but all have had similar findings. These finding can be unified, just as Tetryonics does with Planck and Einstein, Newton and Leibniz, Telsa with Hertz, Faraday and Maxwell and on and on.

The Pythagoreans were on point and on pace to discover this long ago, but too much emphasis was placed upon the individual points within the Tetractys.

Within the Pythagorean Tetractys, we have an over complication of a simpler physical reality. If the focus would have been placed upon the scalar areas of the equilateral triangles, then perhaps we would not be having this discussion today.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

c = 299792458 m/s

c^2= 8.9875518e16 m^2.s^2

Avogadro's Number N = 6.022141579e23

Inverse that to derive Hydrogen mass in Grams...

Convert Hydrogen mass to Kilograms...

Divide that by the Compton Frequency ( meaning the exact number of Planck Quanta found in one Hydrogen atom)...

Planck Quanta in one Hydrogen Atom = 2.2512e23 = 1.2e20 + 2.25e23

E=mc^2

mass of a Hydrogen atom in kilograms times c^2 = Energy in Joules.

Joules is kg.(m^2/s^2) so to get Planck's Constant from total energy remove an 's' from the bottom units.

mass.Omega = h = Planck's Constant ... units being kg.(m^2/s)

Planck's Constant per second...derives back to Joules of kg.(m^2/s^2) === mass.OMEGA per second

Planck mass = 7.376238634e-51 kg

n.Planck mass = 7.376238634e-32 kg

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

I'll strive to point out the flaw in the Pythagorean triangle, and the Error of Einsteins' perception of his Stress Energy Tensor. We are suggesting that the failure to grasp and differentiate between mass and Matter in physics, is what has halted our growth.

It's not all about the pure math…it's what's behind the math. The geometry of Energy itself, guides the math and extends the language of math into new territory unbelievably difficult to pass on to others.

Geometry rules our universe not pure Math. This is not to say that the math is all wrong…rather that the Equilateral Planck Quanta themselves guide the math and provide a grammar or scaffolding ( if you will ) for the math to thrive.

The word 'mass' should never be capitalized to differentiate it from 'Matter" which should always be capitalized. It is the failure to differentiate between mass and Matter that has lead to our current condition of confusion.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Energy-momentum relationship

The total number of Planck quanta [ mass-angular momenta ] in any physical system is directly related to the square of its linear momentum [mass-velocity].

The omega geometry of Energy produces the direct relationships between Planck's constant-quanta and mass-Energy-Momentum of any spatio-temporal co-ordinate system.

mass is a derived physical property relating Energy momenta to Velocity.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

SCALAR/Linear form:

Leibniz [and Newton] showed that the  Energy of a system can be viewed as a product of its mass times velocity squared, or equally as linear momentum squared, forever linking Energy to velocity through the SCALAR properties of mass.

Energy is the ability to do work in varying forms such as potential, kinetic, and mechanical energies, work, heat, and chemical or electrical energies.

mv^2 = E = p^2

---------

Quantized form:

Planck revealed that energy was not continuous, it was quantized - only certain energies are allowed. Continuous energy is a scalar property of mass-energy and its quantization is the result of its equilateral geometry.
In quantum mechanics, energy is defined in terms of the energy operator as a time derivative of the wave function.

E = hv^2

[kg.m^2/s].s-1 =  Energy expressed in Joules...The SI unit of Joules is kg.m^2/s^2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics reveals mass to be a scalar measurement of quantized [equilateral] energy per unit of TIME.
The total energy contained in an object is identified with its EM mass, and ENERGY, like mass, cannot be created or destroyed.  Energy is subject to the law of conservation.

m[OMEGA]v^2

Everything in our Universe results from the equilateral geometry of quantized mass-energies.

Energy is mass-velocity squared

Scalar mass is in kilograms....kg

mass = Energy / v^2

kg = Joules/(m^2/s^2)kg= kg.m^2/s^2/(m^2/s^2)kg = kg ....so we are on the right track when checking our units.

-----------

Energy is Planck-quanta squared

E = hv^2

quantized mass = kg.m^2/s

So quantized mass per second....kg.m^2/s .... per second....

kg.m^2/s = Joule.seconds

kg.m^2/s times s^-1= kg.m^2/s^2 = Energy expressed in the units of Joules....so we are on track yet again.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Just as Tetryonic geometry distinguishes between angular momenta and linear momentum, it also distinguishes between linear momenta and the vector velocities it produces.

Linear momentum as the SCALAR square root. SCALARS are quantities that are fully described by only their magnitude.

Velocity as VECTOR square root. Vectors fully describe both the magnitude and the direction.

Linear Momentum is a SCALAR component of all equilateral mass-energies that produce vector velocities.

Linear Momentum is the SQUARE ROOT of equilateral Planck mass-energy geometries and produces a unidirectional vector force.

Energy can be expressed as the square of linear momentum.

p as momentum, SI units being..( kg.m/s )

Classical Formulation p=mv

We know Energy equals mass times velocity of light squared so....

m above is equal to E/c^2 so we could say p=(E/c^2)(v)

------------------------

Quantum Formulation p=E/v where E = hv^2/v

We know Energy equals mass times velocity so...

p=E/c ....let's inspect those units...

SI units of Energy expressed in Joules = kg.m^2/s^2

Units of 'c' are in ( m/s ) so dividing E by c gives...

[kg.(m^2/s^2) ]/[m/s] = kg.m/s

p=mc = kg.m/s

E=p^2= kg.(m^2/s^2) = mv^2

E=p^2

E=mv^2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

We all know that a discourse upon these themes are required to get to the bottom of all this physics lingo and terminology. These posts are my attempts to cover some basics before delving in a bit deeper. I think some of you are ready for that now, and some of you are not.

----------------

Tetryonics shows that mass is a scalar measurement of equilateral energy per unit of Time. ANY measurement of Energy is a measurement of mass. Matter has mass, but not all mass is Matter.

EM waves, Photons and Bosons are 2d planar mass-energies. Euclidian is right.

Matter then combines to form 3D standing waves, and individual tetrahedral arrangements are tetryons - the quantum of Matter.

Scalar energies can be related to velocity-momenta through mass geometries.

The relationship between scalar mass-energy, linear momentum and quantised angular momentum is the result of the equilateral geometry.

Energy is the total Planck quanta per second.

EM mass is a scalar energy per unit of Time.

Charge is the nett Angular momentum per spacial co-ordinate system.

Kinetic Energy is the Electric field of mass-energy of Matter moving at v.

The general formulation of Planck's heat law E=nhv is now changed to a specific formulation of E=[ODD]hv for transverse quantum levels [Bosons].

Tetryonic geometry [n(pi)] redefines Planck's quantum formulation for heat energies, from a generalized equation for 2D energy momenta, into a geometric formulation for all mass-energy momenta in Matter.

All Equilateral (pi) geometries contain square number quanta.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics is founded on the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta, where the square quantum numbers of Physics are in fact equilateral geometries.

Planck quanta [kg*[m^2/s] is a measure of the Energy/sec [mass] of the quanta, and its quantised Angular momentum [qAm] m^2/s which is the direct result if its equilateral geometry [not a vector rotation about a point as it is classically described].

The qAm gives rise to all geometry at the Planck scale through Charge [which is the result of h/c^2 geometries].
These h quanta combine to create a 'fabric' of mass-Energy over the geometric framework that Charge interaction creates and the number of h quanta per charge fascia is what gives us the de Broglie, Compton frequencies, momenta etc of Matter itself

mass-Energies are 2D planar EM fields and Matter is a 3D standing-wave geometry made up up [n]pi square number Planck mass-Energy geometries.

In the QM eBook you can follow the development of all fermionic Matter geometries from charges
Tetryons [4pi], Quarks [12pi], Leptons [12pi], Mesons [24pi], Baryons [36pi] etc
as determined by Weak & Strong force interactions between the Charged fascia of Planck mass-Energies.

Each geometry will have specific mass-Energy quanta contents for each n quantum energy level.
The Tetryonic UFE has the following basic structure Geometry * [mass-Energy quanta]

so Leptons are 12pi * n1 & Baryons are 36pi * 25^2 for their ground energy levels
resulting in 1.2 e20 for electrons - 22500 e19 for all Baryons [and for example 12 for Neutrinos]
This is all more clearly illustrated in the QM eBook in much greater detail for each particle type and familty etc

of course the total charge fascia is what we measure as the net 'elementary' charge of each particle
electron [0 pos/12 neg charges = net neg 12 charge] - Protons [24 pos/12 neg = net 12 pos charge]
neutrinos [6/6 =0] Neutrons [18/18 =0]

so rest mass-Matter electrons have 1.2 e20 quanta [compton frequencies] and
rest mass-Matter Baryons have 2.25 e23 quanta [compton frequencies]"--Abraham

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Let's see if sticking to the unit's themselves will shed some more light on this geometric perspective...and starting at the beginning of course.

Velocity is a physical quantity requiring both magnitude and direction to define it >> v=m/s

Acceleration >> a = m/s^2

Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity.

In one dimension, acceleration is the rate at which something speeds up or slows down.

However, since velocity is a vector, acceleration describes the rate of change of both the magnitude and the direction of velocity.

Acceleration has the dimensions....

[Lenth]/[Time Squared]

In SI units, acceleration is measured in meters per second squared (m/s^2)

In classical mechanics, for a body with constant mass, the acceleration of the body is proportional to the net force acting on it. Newton's second law

Force is F = ma = kg.m/s^2

Additionally, for a mass with constant velocity, the energy of motion is expressed as its momentum...Acceleration causes changes in Energy-Momentum.

p=kg.m/s

There is no blunder with the square issue. I'm representing how Tetryonics views the situation.

Here's a big re-definition...Tetryonics shows the proper way to view and comprehend Quantised Angular Momentum.

When you draw a tessellated field of equilateral triangles, they sum to a 'square' number.

Take the SQRT of that number and you have the linear momentum.

Linear momentum is the square root of scalar energies.

Linear momentum represents the Scalar height of any equilateral field of mass-energy. So back to the 8^2 field...there are 64 total Planck quanta in that field and there are 8 Planck Quanta running up the center to the apex. Relating to p=mv and E=mv^2 can be related back to p^2=mv^2.

p=mv --- the 'v' in this equation relates to the number of triangles moving up the center of the triangle.
E=pv
E=p^2

Energy is mass-velocity squared...
E=mv^2
Energy can be expressed as the square of linear momentum.
p^2=kg.m^2/s^2=E as expressed in Joules which = the same dimensional units as mv^2=p^2
p=kg.m/s -- The vector square root of any equilateral mass-energy field.

"Spectral lines present what is possibly the best example of the impact of changing Newtonian linear momenta in quantum mechanics. Linear momenta [the square root of scalar energies] represented by the scalar height of any equilateral field of mass-energy and is represented accordingly in all illustrations with its vector direction of force being a vector arrow in the same direction."- Tetryonics

-=-=-=-=-=-=

Equilateral mass-energy geometries from tetrahedral mass-Matter topologies in radial spatial co-ordinate systems defined by the speed of light. Keep in mind that all Matter's 4[pi] mass-Energies ares Lorentz invariant to accelerations.

A Spacial region is defined so as to measure the physics of mass-ENERGY-Matter within its confines.

Energy moves through Space in various forms: radiant energies, Matter etc.

Space can be Cubic, Spherical or Tetrahedral as defined by the spatial co-ordinates used to define the region.

Free Space is a contiguous volume or area of any regular geometry that is free, available, or unoccupied.

Empty space is defined as a topology whose volume id devoid of Energy.

There is NO aether for the transmission of Light in empty space.

2d space has Flat 'Euclidian' Geometries.

The linear vector of divergent Energy forms various co-ordinate systems based on its vetcor directions per unit of Time.

Spacial Geometries are based on the vector speed of Light and form distinct spacial co-ordinate systems of the measurement of physics.

c relates to a vector line - 1 dimensional velocity - linear meters

c^2 relates to planar circles - 2 dimensions velocity squared - radial seconds

c^3 relates to cubic volumes - 3 dimensions velocity cubed - Cartesian co-ordinates

c^4 relates to spherical volumes - 3 dimensions quarternion velocity - radial seconds^2

c is the natural velocity of light

Energy has a 2d equilateral geometry [Euclidian}

Equilateral geometry is the inverse of radial geometry.

Time - as a measure of divergent energies has a radial geometry.

3D Matter has a tetrahedral mass-energy topology.

------------

PLANCK QUANTUM LEVELS

Planck's formulation for Energy is imprecise for use in Tetryonics and does not reflect the velocity-momenta relationship inherent in the equilateral geometry of Energy.

Energy is gained or lost in whole number multiples of the quantity hv.

The generalized formulation of Planck's heat law.

E= nhv ... is now changed to a specific formulation of.
E=[ODD}hv for transverse quantum levels ( Bosons )

SCALAR ENERGY QUANTA
Energy is gained or lost in equilateral geometries as whole number multiples of the quantity hv^2

mass-energy momenta are geometrically related to velocity.

Tetryonic Geometry [n(pi)] redefines Planck's quantum formulation for heat enrgies from a generalized equation for 2d energy momenta into a geometric formulation for all mass-energy momenta in Matter

All equilateral [pi] geometries contain square number quanta.

------------

Square numbers are in fact Equilateral [Triangular] Geometries.

English has us thinking that the word square dictates a square geometry in our minds. In Tetryonics we should take care to place quotes around the word 'square' so as not to confuse. We can all 'square' the circle in a little bit different way than we have been doing it before.

The circles you see drawn around an inscribed equilateral triangle represents the time measurement of the energy 'quoin'. The 'quoin' is one Planck Quanta, and it has a plus charge on one side and a negative charge on the other.

A c^2 circle represents a one second measure of the energy content resulting in a measure of mass energy.

When working with energy and mass we use c^2 circles, but you'll notice that c^4 circles represent a seconds^2 mass energy measurement of the Matter Topology.

-------------

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

QAM = Quantised Angular Momenta [m^2/s]

It's often mistakenly described as spin, flux, and curl in physics and electrical engineering, when in fact is it the equilateral geometry of energy itself.

ie Planck's constant [h] = kg.m^2/s = mass.QAM = mass.OMEGA

QAM is the hitherto 'hidden' foundation geometry that creates everything in our Universe - mass-ENERGY-Matter and the Forces of motion and interaction on all scales.

ALPHA is the FORCE between any two material objects created by the super-positioning of their two EM fields of mass-energy momenta [as in ALPHA constant].

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonic theory maps QAM as equilateral Planck geometries & reveals d.QAM to be time.

Time and the spatial dimensions it creates are mapped with radial & spherical co-ordinates.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Shortly after Tetryonics showed up on my radar, another individual named Wayne Roberts came to my attention. It only added fuel to fire my research and I've not been the same since.

I have attempted to email Roberts ever so often to elaborate and extrapolate upon some of his ideas, but I can't elicit a response. As a result, I've sort of taken it upon myself to read, and re-read his work until my brain explodes.

If you search for this on Google, I've found that he has very recently removed all the work from the internet. Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory can be found below, unfortunately the online content is nowhere to be found. Fill out one of my contact forms on the site and I'll forward you what I have of his work, despite that it's not complete in the state I have it. (http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/contact )

http://www.wroberts.com.au/html/principles_of_nature_towards_a_new_visual_language.html

He had up his Scale Structure Theory site athttp://www.principlesofnature.net and I only noticed it being offline recently. Searching for "Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory" on google brings you to me, and even this forum, as I've mentioned him before.

Below is a snap shot of one of two scholarly mentions of Roberts work that I've found. Roberts Eutrogens are also mentioned in the Tetryonics materials.

Equilateral Triangular Unit of Roberts mentioned in "MYSTERIES OF THE EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE" by Brian J. McCartin -- Applied Mathematics Kettering University

 

------------

Tetryonics 3.10....notes...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Word Salad...only applies to those who have not yet studied the work. Those of us who study Tetryonics take great card not to mince words. Does that mean that we don't typo from time to time as human beings....? No! That's why it's important to create an environment of checks and balances as we go along. We welcome all skeptics, and would ask that you apply your critical thinking skills to all the other theories out there at present and see what happens when you do...
Before we continue....

A Contract Between You and Me: The Philosopher’s Agreement

I assume that you are a thinking person. If you are a thinking person, you are a philosopher, and I ask you to join me in what I call the “Philosopher’s Agreement” as you read on.

The Philosopher’s Agreement is a traditional agreement philosophers have observed to place the focus on ideas and not their originators. The term ad hominem refers to an attack made on a philosopher instead of the ideas of the philosopher, and ad hominem attacks of course violate the Philosopher’s Agreement.

The Philosopher’s Agreement goes much further than merely prohibiting ad hominem attacks — it supports the philosopher’s search for ever greater understanding. According to this agreement, you have two options when you detect a flaw in my presentation:

1. If you cannot see how to correct the flaw, it is your privilege to describe the flaw and your obligation to share any thoughts you have about how to correct the flaw.

2. If you can see how to correct the flaw, it is your obligation to describe both the flaw and your solution for correcting the flaw.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The word 'mass' should never be capitalized to differentiate it from 'Matter" which should always be capitalized. It is the failure to differentiate between mass and Matter that has lead to our current condition of confusion.

I encourage the skeptics to keep up what they do best. Point me to the holes and inconsistencies in the theory, and I'll do my best to resolve them for you. I'm just a lowly student, and not the author, so hold me to the fire and keep the irons hot.

And while we're at it, let's really try to stick to the actual content as expressed in the source work of Tetryonics rather stating asinine comments that have no relevance to the topic at hand. I know that won't happen, but I'll only engage with those who understand this point right here.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Moving on...faster than light.
Who's playing catch up, and who's falling far behind?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

LINEAR MOMENTUM

In Classical mechanics, momentum ( SI units of kg.m/s or equivalently N.s ) is the product of the mass and velocity of an object.

Like velocity, momentum is a vector quantity, possessing a direction as well as a magnitude.

Momentum is a conserved quantity (law of conservation of linear momentum), meaning that if a closed system is not affected by external forces, its total momentum cannot change.

Momentum should be referred to in its specific forms to distinguish it in its various forms [ Quantised Angular, Linear, Rotational and quantum/nuclear momentum].

Although originally expressed in Newton's Second Law, the conservation of momentum also holds in special relativity and, with appropriate definitions, a generalized momentum conservation law holds in electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, and general relativity.

In relativistic mechanics, non-relativistic momentum is further multiplied by the Lorentz factor.

Energy can be expressed as the square of linear momentum

kg(m^2/s^2)

Linear momentum is the vector square root of any equilateral mass-energy field.

p=mv=kg.m/s

p^2=kg.m^2/s^2

p^2=E=mv^2

 

"Linear momentum [mv], the square root of ENERGY [mv^2] comprised of equilateral Planck quanta [hv^2] forms the basis for time independent interactions-at-a-distance forces such as Gravity and Electrical Charge in Classical mechanics as well the source of the alpha constant and electromagnetic forces in velocity limited [v/c] Lorentz equations of relativistic mechanics [m*v^2/c^2]"--T-theory

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The units of Linear Momentum are kg.m/s

mv=kg.m/s

Energy expressed in Joules is kg.m^2/s^2

The height of the EM field is 'v'---and the square of that number is 'v^2'
p^2=

E=mv^2=kg.m^2/s^2
p=mv
p^2=E=mv^2

Energy-momentum relationship

The total number of Planck quanta [ mass-angular momenta ] in any physical system is directly related to the square of its linear momentum [mass-velocity]

The omega geometry of Energy produces the direct relationships between Planck's constant-quanta and mass-Energy-Momentum of any spatio-temporal co-ordinate system

mass is a derived physical property relating Energy momenta to Velocity.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

p = mv

p^2 = mv^2

If you have an 8 squared field of Energy...total Energy...there are 64 individual Planck Quanta...

The square root of 64 is 8 and that represents the linear momentum of the Total Field. I'm not talking about Kinetic Energy.

p = Sqrt of Energy

p^2 = E = mv^2

You have to draw a Squared EM field of Tessellated triangles to see the relationship.

The combined Kinetic and Magnetic moment energies total mv^2

p^2/2m = KE = 1/2 Mv^2 ---but here the Capital M relates to the mass content of the Matter topology.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Square roots of equilateral Energy is linear momentum thus
reveling the geometric relationship between Energy & momenta.

Energy-momentum relationship

The total number of Planck quanta [ mass-angular momenta ] in any physical system is directly related to the square of its linear momentum [mass-velocity]

The omega geometry of Energy produces the direct relationships between Planck's constant-quanta and mass-Energy-Momentum of any spatio-temporal co-ordinate system

mass is a derived physical property relating Energy momenta to Velocity.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

SCALAR/Linear form:

In quantum mechanics, energy is defined in terms of the energy operator as a time derivative of the wave function.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Leibniz [and Newton] showed that the  Energy of a system can be viewed as a product of its mass times velocity squared, or equally as linear momentum squared, forever linking Energy to velocity through the SCALAR properties of mass.

Energy is the ability to do work in varying forms such as potential, kinetic, and mechanical energies, work, heat, and chemical or electrical energies.

mv^2 = E = p^2

Quantized form:

Planck revealed that energy was not continuous, it was quantized - only certain energies are allowed. Continuous energy is a scalar property of mass-energy and its quantization is the result of its equilateral geometry.

E = hv^2

[kg.m^2/s].s-1 =  Energy expressed in Joules...The SI unit of Joules is kg.m^2/s^2

Tetryonics reveals mass to be a scalar measurement of quantized [equilateral] energy per unit of TIME.
The total energy contained in an object is identified with its EM mass, and ENERGY, like mass, cannot be created or destroyed.  Energy is subject to the law of conservation.
m[OMEGA]v^2

Everything in our Universe results from the equilateral geometry of quantized mass-energies.

Energy is mass-velocity squared

Scalar mass is in kilograms....kg

mass = Energy / v^2

kg = Joules / (m^2/s^2)kg= [kg.m^2/s^2] / (m^2/s^2)kg = kg ....so we are on the right track when checking our units.
-----------

Energy is Planck-quanta squared

E = hv^2

quantized mass = kg.m^2/s = Joule.seconds

So quantized mass per second....kg.m^2/s .... per second....

kg.m^2/s times s^-1= kg.m^2/s^2 = Energy expressed in the units of Joules....so we are on track yet again.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Just as Tetryonic geometry distinguishes between angular momenta and linear momentum, it also distinguishes between linear momenta and the vector velocities it produces.

Linear momentum as the SCALAR square root. SCALARS are quantities that are fully described by only their magnitude.

Velocity as VECTOR square root. Vectors fully describe both the magnitude and the direction.

Linear Momentum is a SCALAR component of all equilateral mass-energies that produce vector velocities.

Linear Momentum is the SQUARE ROOT of equilateral Planck mass-energy geometries and produces a unidirectional vector force.

Energy can be expressed as the square of linear momentum.

p as momentum, SI units being..( kg.m/s )

Classical Formulation p=mv

We know Energy equals mass times velocity of light squared so....

m above is equal to E/c^2 so we could say p=(E/c^2).v

Quantum Formulation p=E/v where E = hv^2/v

We know Energy equals mass times velocity so

p=E/c ....let's inspect those units...

SI units of Energy expressed in Joules = kg.m^2/s^2

Units of c are in ( m/s ) so dividing E by c gives...

[kg.(m^2/s^2) ]/[m/s] = kg.m/s

p=mc = kg.m/s

E=p^2= kg.(m^2/s^2) = mv^2

E=p^2

E=mv^2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Einstein’s E=mc2 is a specific example of Leibniz’s general formulation of E=mv2 [applicable only to standing wave Matter and Photons in a vacuum] and that mass is not Matter [mc2 = E = Mc4].

The word 'mass' should never be capitalized to differentiate it from 'Matter" which should always be capitalized. It is the failure to differentiate between mass and Matter that has lead to our current condition of confusion.

EM mass is a planar measurement of 2D energy per unit of time.

or

EM mass is a measure of planar energy density per second.

mass must be distinguished from Matter in physics because Matter is a poorly defined concept in modern science, and although all types of agreed-upon Matter exhibit properties of mass, it is also the case that there are many types of Energy that posses NO Matter topology, such as potential energy, kinetic energies and electromagnetic radiation (photons).

The term 'massless' is a misnomer, and should be abandoned moving forward. Matterless would be a term that actually makes sense in that Bosons, Photon, and EM waves are Matterless.

EM mass geometries are subject to Lorentz corrections.

2D mass-Energy geometry is NOT 3D Matter Topology. The word "geometry" refers to the 2D planar fields, and the word "Topology" references the 3D Matter Topology.

In physics, EM mass-energy equivalence is the concept that the EM mass of a body is a measure of it's energy content.

Using this concept, EM mass is a property of all Energy, and Energy is a property of all EM mass, and the two properties are connected by a constant.

In Tetryonics geometry it can be shown that the constant is the equilateral geometry of Quantised Angular Momentum (QAM) thus unifying Classical mechanics and Relativistic mechanics.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The relationship between scalar mass-energy, linear momentum and quantised angular momentum is the result of the equilateral geometry.

Energy is the total Planck quanta per second.

EM mass is a scalar energy per unit of Time.

Charge is the nett Angular momentum per spacial co-ordinate system.

Kinetic Energy is the Electric field of mass-energy of Matter moving at v.

The general formulation of Planck's heat law E=nhv is now changed to a specific formulation of E=[ODD]hv for transverse quantum levels [Bosons].

Tetryonic geometry [n(pi)] redefines Planck's quantum formulation for heat energies, from a generalized equation for 2D energy momenta, into a geometric formulation for all mass-energy momenta in Matter.

-------------------

Energy Quantisation

All mass-Energy-Matter can only have certain integer energy-momenta. mass-Energy in all its forms is QUANTISED.

Nett quantised angular momenta [inductive energy flux] determines Charge.

Transverse quanta create Quantum Levels.

The equilateral geometry of quantised angular momenta creates charged masses.

Scalar (nett) quanta create Square Energies.

Planck's Constant can be described in a number of differing ways.

Scalar Energy x Time = Units of kg.(m^2/s^2).s = kg.m^2/s

Linear Momentum x Distance = kg.(m/s).m = kg.m^2/s

'c' forms a constant of proportionality for different spaciao-Temporal co-ordinate systems used to measure mass-ENERGY-Matter.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

“We have to be able to recognize that the attainment of knowledge is the highest labor of mankind. And that the attainment of knowledge is the basis of all philanthropy, the basis of all unselfishness, the basis of all cooperation, and the strengthening of all the constructive emotions of the human being.

Therefore to do this, it must be a discipline. And all ancient people set aside certain disciplines for those who wanted to know the truth more than anything else. These they called the mystery schools. The greatest of all wisdom is the love of truth, the love of reality.

We’ve had years and years of corrupted wisdom. We’ve had years and years of pseudo knowledge and we’re now very much in need of the real thing.” - Manly P. Hall

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

I've been at it again, and again, I've FINALLY seen the light on a number of different aspects...
It took me a long little while, but working through the entire train of though concerning 'n Planck mass', a study of the units, and avogadro's number---I've come a long way in mapping Tetryonics, the numbers and understanding to my mind.

Overall I'm continually buzzed in the head when I get down to the study and attempt to discover the layers you've provided the student.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Emergence is a broad term applying to many differing aspects of Nature 'emerging' from basic physics.... Tetryonics is unique in that it is a truly unified theory developed from the ground up [rather than the top down like most modern theories] from the single postulate of equilateral Planck mass-energy momenta as the building block of all the physics of nature..... As such it covers and explains many emergent properties of Nature within science such as TIME, CHARGE, MASS, MATTER, ENERGY MOMENTA, the PERIODICITY OF ELEMENTS, ELECTROMAGNETIC PHASE RELATIONSHIPS, and the emergence of GRAVITY.... it even covers the emergence of LIFE itself.....KCA

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Logical Progress (cliff notes) as best I can understand it to date. Arriving at Planck's Constant from theory alone...

Rest Matter Exclusive of heat energies ( absolute zero ) or energies from the act of measuring.

Inverse Avogadro's number = Rest mass of Hydrogen

Rest mass of Hydrogen / Compton Frequency = Planck mass

Rest mass of Hydrogen / Planck mass = Compton Frequency

From there, you use E=mc^2 to find Joules of energy of one Planck mass

E=Planck mass times speed of light squared

E as Joules and with units -- kg-m^2/s^2 -- and Planck constant units are kg-m^2/s so the numerical value sticks, but the units change to represent mass.Omega = kg.m^2/s.....mass.OMEGA per second...gives you Joules.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Second Attempt with commentary and numerical analysis.

We take the inverse of Avagadro's Number....to arrive at a theoretical value for the Rest mass of Hydrogen in Grams.

1 / 6.022141579e23 = 1.660538841e-24 g of Hydrogen. Hydrogen mass expressed as grams.

.001 / 6.022141579e23 = mass of hydrogen expressed in kg...

1.660538841e-27 kg...

Use the mass of hydrogen expressed in kilograms and now divide by the Compton Frequency. The Compton Frequency is the actual number of Planck Quanta within the Matter Topology of Hydrogen...it's value is 2.2512e23.

In order to calculate this value, we have to work through the sub atomic particles themselves.

First Hydrogen has one electron and one proton, so let's start with the Electron.

The ground state of an electron is n=1 meaning there are 1e19 planck quanta per face...this equals n-ground state of 1 or n1.

We know that Electrons are 12pi Matter Topologies...( 3 neg tetrahedrons ). So we multiply 1e19 by 12 to get 1.2e20 total quanta within an Electron.

So let's set aside the 1.2e20 planck quanta in an electron and move on to the proton.

A protons n-ground state is actually 25...meaning there are 25^2 times more planck quanta within each charged fascia of a proton than an electron... But wait...Protons are actually 3 quarks. 1-Up, 1-Down, 1-Up.

Quarks are also 3 tetrahedrons ( but different configuration than electrons)...so 12 faces each. So when 3 quarks come together you have 36 total faces in the Matter Topology of a Proton.

n25=n-ground state of a quarks/Proton. each n-quantum level has 1e19 planck quanta. There are 25^2 * 1e19=625*1e19 Quanta within each face of a proton. And then there are 36 faces...

25^2 Times 1e19 Times 36 faces === 2.2500e23

An electron has 1.2e20 planck quanta so we add that to 2.2500e23 totaling 2.2512e23 ---Planck Quanta in one Hydrogen atom...

We take the inverse of Avogadro's number to arrive at what should be the Hydrogen mass and divide that by the total number of Quanta it takes to build it, and that gives you Planck mass.

1.660538841e-27 kg/2.2512e23=Planck mass

Planck mass = 7.376238634e-51

If you do the 1.660538814e-27/22,512n=n.Planck mass calculation you end up with 7.376238634e-32 kg = n.Planck mass. Each n ground state level contains 1e19 planck quanta.

Since the n.Planck mass value is the total mass per value per ground state n-level, and n1 has 1e19 individual Planck Quanta, we divide...n.Planck mass by 1e19...

7.376238634e-32 kg / 1e19 = Planck mass

Planck mass = 7.376238634e-51

E=mc^2

mass=Energy/seconds

Energy expressed in Joules ( kg.m^2/s^2 ) = (Planck mass) times c^2

E= (7.376238634e-51kg) times (8.9875518e16)

E= 6.629432672e-34 Joules

Since Planck's constant is expressed in Joule.seconds, you can think of Planck's Constant per second (kg.m^2/s)/(sec) as Joules kg.m^2/s^2

Therefor Planck's Constant is 6.629432672e-34 J.s

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Removing the commentary this would all look like this.

Inverse Avogadro's number = Rest mass of Hydrogen

Rest mass of Hydrogen / Compton Frequency = Planck mass

From there, you use E=mc^2 to find Joules of energy of one Planck mass

E = (Planck mass) times (speed of light squared)

E units is kg-m^2/s^2 ( Joules ) and Planck constant units are kg-m^2/s (mass.OMEGA) so the numerical value sticks, but the units change to represent mass.Omega = kg.m^2/s.....mass.OMEGA per second...gives you joules.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Using planck mass to verify Hydrogen mass

(Planck mass) times (Total Planck Quanta) = (7.376238634 e-51 kg)x(2.2512e23) = 1.660538841e-27kg per hydrogen particle.

Hydrogen mass = 1 Electron mass + 1 proton mass

Electrons are shown to be comprised of 3 negative tetryons. They have a ground state of n=1=1e19 planck quanta, per charged fascia.

There are 3 negative tetrahedra, thus providing 12pi individual faces with a single electron. Each face contains 1e19 individual Planck Quanta, and we multiply that value by 12 to count the Total Planck Quanta in an electron.

12 x 1e19 = 1.2e20 planck quanta in one electron

A Proton is comprised of 3 Quarks, so we have to realize there are 36 charged fascia in the Matter Topology of a Proton. Quarks each have 12 faces each. Protons are also shown to be up-down-up not up-up-down...

The ground state of a proton is n level 25.

n=25 meaning there are 25^2 *1e19 planck quanta per charged fascia.

Remembering that the Matter Topology of a Proton has 36pi faces.

(25^2) times (1e19 planck quanta) times (36 pi faces)= 2.25e23 planck quanta in one proton.

Total Hydrogen Planck Quanta is then 2.25e23 + 1.2e20 = 2.2512e23

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Kelvin's response

Spot on Richard,

Having worked this out myself I also know how your brain feels right now
{and seeing you do so makes me mighty happy I must say and gives me enormous hope for others out there – if only they’d apply themselves}

Of course all that work and effort was eventually condensed into my attached illustrations [which I am sure you’ve seen before but now have an even better understanding of]

And the next step you’ll have to take will come with the realisation that 22512e23 Planck quanta is the Compton frequency of Hydrogen at absolute zero….. in reality once an electron binds with a Proton to form Hydrogen the kEM field energies of the electron are immediately raised to n1 [buts that’s another story for you to explore as you delve further into spectral line emissions and molar masses of elements etc. – see the last 3 illustrations and think about it some more]

Of course the immediate implication from this ‘simple’ exercise was that we can now derive EXACT values for Planck’s constant, the mass of an electron & Proton [Hydrogen] AND Avogadro’s constant directly from theory – something hitherto never done by ANY scientific theory to date…… and then correct the weighted molar masses for each and every periodic element possible [once it is realised that Deuterium not Hydrogen is the building block of these elements – but that again is another story]

Interestingly given that the inverse of Avogadro’s number is [by definition] the mass of Hydrogen and that Planck’s constant has been known for some time – it is of interest why no PHD or Professor never divided one by the other to determine the Compton Frequency until I [and more recently yourself] did

……. Perhaps they did but simply couldn’t understand what 22515e23 represented the solution to this maths equation…….

Hope you are safe and well over there – been watching the news about your recent weather etc and you and your family and friends are never far from my thoughts and prayers..

Stay safe and keep exploring – there are more exciting things ahead [soon to be released] that will slay the naysayers once and for all…. Kelvin

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

I've been in study of the units of the Joule....and here's what I've finally pieced together..Joules is the SI unit of energy, work, or amount of heat. It's equal to the energy transferred when applying a force of one Newton through a distance of one meter, or in passing an electric current of one ampere through a resistance of one ohm for one second.

Energy as expressed in the equation E=mc^2 is expressed in Joules....kilograms.(meters^2/seconds^2)

Units of a Joule = kg.m^2/s^2 = Newton.meters

Planck's constant...all by itself...is expressed as kg.(m^2/s) = Joule.seconds = J.s

....so when you divide Joule.seconds -- [kg.(m^2/s)] by (seconds) - ( thus adding the time component ) we get a 'per second measurement' ending up with Joules = [kg . m^2/s^2] === Which can be understood as Planck per second and...

is equal to the total Energy (Joules)....

....kilograms.meters^2/second ==== kg.(m^2/s) = is the units for Planck's Constant

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
the units of mass.Omega --- Planck's Constant
mass.Omega = (kg.m^2/s) = Planck's constant (h) expressed as (Joule.seconds)
So if you say 'mass.OMEGA -per second' ...you end up with Joules....[(kg.m^2/s) / s] = kg.m^2/s^2 === Joules

We can Understand OMEGA or QAM ( Quantised Angular Momenta) as scalar area of the triangles.

The units of OMEGA is m^2/s. It's a value when measuring a single planck quantum is .0012 m^2/s ---but it must be understood that this value increases or decreases depending on overall energy density. I'm working on the math to that, but haven't cracked that code just yet.

In the equation [mass.Omega = (kg.m^2/s)] the OMEGA is simply present in the equation to show how the units expressed in Planck's Constant come about - Joule.seconds = kg.m^2/s

mass is energy measured over time. There is no such thing as massless, and you can immediately correct anyone and everyone that suggests such a term...

This is another highlighting of how I can view the research of others, and get to the very bottom of where they have gone wrong. Matter-less makes more sense because EM waves are Matter-less, bosons and photons are Matter-less, but once the 3D tetrahedrons form...that is Matter. No other theory to date can or has offered us this definition distinction.

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/sciences/sociology/culture-and-societies/symbols-and-language-in-human-culture

In the 1930s, Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf proposed that languages influence perceptions. While this Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis—also called the linguistic relativity hypothesis—is controversial, it legitimately suggests that a person will more likely perceive differences when he or she possesses words or concepts to describe the differences.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
HERE'S SOME TRICKY DISTINCTIONS>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Care needs to be taken where inertial mass (E/c^2) and seconds appear in the same equation as c^2 is a one second radial spatial measure of 'light seconds' as I term it and can be equivalent to each other depending on the equation and units used.

Ie inertial mass is a measure of Energy per light second (E/c^2) and this can be stated differently... mass is Energy per spacial measurement per second.

scalar Energy is a measure of the number of Planck quanta available to exert a force (hv^2).

Even one Planck quanta is still (E=hv^2) as 1 is a 'squared' equilateral geometry....v= 1....v^2=1...so hv^2 is still planck's constant where only one Triangle is concerned.

Energy = (6.629432672e^-34 J.s) times (1^2 per second)

But whereas Energy is mv^2 (or hv^2 if you use Planck's constant instead of scalar mass.velocity),

Charge (Coulombs) is mass.seconds (kg.s) - not something you'll find in textbooks other than mine and Miles Mathis.

So 1 Planck quantum (hv^2) ----- 'v' in this case is 1 Planck Quantum... mass.omega (kg.m^2/s) (per second) = kg.m^2/s^2= Joules...!!!

(mv^2) = Energy and the same quantum per 'light second' (h.v^2/c^2) = mass

Planck constant = mass.omega = 6.629432672 e-34 j.s

Planck per sec = hv^2/s = 6.629432672 e-34 joules

(energy is already a squared equilateral geometry)

Planck per light second = h/c^2 = 7.376238634 e-51 kg = Planck mass.

And of course Omega/c^2 = mass.seconds = Coulombs = kg.s (1/12th the elementary charge)

And now let's inspect the units of OMEGA divided by c^2

OMEGA value of a single Planck Quantum is .0012 m^2/s and c^2 is in units of (m^2/s^2)

.0012 m^2/s divided by (299792458m^2/s^2) = 1.33518e-20 seconds

The OMEGA value of (0.0012 m^2/s) is a measure of the equilateral scalar GEOMETRY of Planck's constant - per spacial measurement - (which shrinks as energy or velocity increases in any system G Lorentz contractions) whereas the inertial mass of that system remains a constant (relating force to accelerations via F=ma over time) and is a measure of the energy (number of Planck quanta per second per c^2 ) of a system (rest + kinetic)

NOT AN EASY TOPIC TO WRAP YOUR HEAD AROUND AT TIMES

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

A single photon comprised of 2 Planck quanta has:

1.325886534 e-33 Joules of ENERGY we get this value by simple multiplying Planck's constant by two triangles per second.....
correct
Energy = (Planck's Constant x frequency)
correct

Calculating frequency using E/(planck's constant)= Frequency >> 2...that gives me the number of triangles, but is this the same as saying there was a frequency of only 1 photon moving past a point in one second?correct

Note: 1 hertz is a cyclic waveform where the measured EM energies cycle from one value through a sinusoidal wave [in most cases] back to the same vale…. Ie positive to negative BACK to positive…. So in order to do this using Planck EM geometries you need 2 bosons [2hv] to create 1 photon [hf] in order to produce the full cyclic EM waveform, using just one boson results in a ½ wave measurement which co-incidentally agrees with Einstein’s formula for Zero Point Energy [E=hf/2]… ie a Bosons [hf/2 = hv] the smallest quanta of energy possible.

This photon then has a mass equivalence of 1.475247727 e-50 kg [E/c^2] ---Check, I get this...!correct

the linear momentum of the same photon would be
4.422681422 e-42 n.s [E/c] or [m*c] kg.m/s >

(kg.m^2/s^2) Times (s/m) resolving the units down to kg.m/s
Thus showing us the units of linear momentum from the other direction!

Yes, always a good approach to these calculations

I think I lost something when copying over the Joules part..I was originally missing an [e^-33] in the Energy content as expressed in Joules, but finally was able to work through that mistake.

[happens a lot with math, imagine only having to show the right geometry to pass exams in schools]

Also, are there bound photons in every Matter fascia -- They exist, but can't escape the standing wave energy configuration, as Matter fascia is not radiation or propagating from a source ? , or are photons only detectible in KEM fields and EM field geometries because those are radiating fields?...perhaps a redundant question but want to ensure I'm not missing the mark in general.

Photons can be found in the EM fields they make as well as moving freely through space and other media. Hence the plethora of EM field terms in T-theory – EM, kEM,gEM, cEM etc. if emitted from a material object then I consider them ‘free; unbound photons moving at c in whatever media they pass through, but they can also be found in EM fields [radiant EM & kEM fields] of Matter as well, and these fields expand at c over time as well from their point sources, but the photons remain in their geometric phase arrangement of the field wrt each other photon in the field.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So now that I see the kg mass of a single planck quanta...does that value ever change, or is it that the Lorenz contractions simply increase the same mass energy content into a smaller and smaller region? increasing energy density of the region concerned...never, Planck quanta are fixed chunks of mass-energy momenta with immutable physical properties, the building blocks of everything in our Universe, but as we add or release more [or less] of them to any region of space we are measuring they must be ‘compressed’ [or expand] within that region in order for more [or less] mass-energy momenta to be measure over the same period of time [c^n etc]

^^^^^^^^This precisely the answer I expected...and working with Planck mass....is a breeze, and my breakthrough last month was in calculating the mass energy content of all the Sub-Atomic Particles at rest, that exists in the standard model!!

Planck mass = 7.736238634e-51 kg

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So if we take Energy = mass times velocity^2 and use " c as the speed of light....299792458 m/s"....c^2 = 8.9875518e16 m^2/s^2

Solving for Energy in Joules...is simple...so very simple... E= (7.376238634 e-51kg) times (299792458m/s)^2

With measurements of ENERGY the Planck triangles remain the same size and the final field geometry grows ever larger as we add energy quanta to it,
While with MASS the spatial field is constrained by c^2 radial co-ordinates and an increase in energy means the size of the Planck quanta must shrink in size in order to fit into the field [Lorentz contraction hv^2/c^2]….. or expand if energies are removed from the field.

Note also that ENERGY measurements are instantaneous snapshots of the energy of a system under measurement and have NO time component to them [like c^n, and t in Newton’s and Coulomb’s eqn.s etc.] while any formula that includes time components [like relativity] is measuring the mass of a system [and calculating the energy content using E=mc^2]

What's the simplest method to understanding how OMEGA or QAM contracts so that I can mathematically apply correction to the scalar area of .0012 m^2/s to other situations? I might be getting ahead of myself here, but perhaps not. I feel like I'm still stuck in using Elementary charge and QAM in mathematical situations.

The simplest way is to view OMEGA [quantised angular momenta] as in a equilateral triangle constrained by a TEMPORAL [time] circle
Ie the Tibetan symbol etchttp://www.muslimsandtheworld.com/triangle-inside-circle-occult-illuminati-symbol
[in fact you can draw a triangle with a circle inside and outside to represent QAM and time respectively to illustrate growth over time or contraction over time]

I see the elementary charge as (.0012 m^2/s)/(c^2) so what connections do I need to make before I can truly apply this across the board?

Indeed it is, but is is simple the area [0.0012 m^2] that 1 quantum of charged Planck mass-energy covers when allowed to expand for 1 light second [c^2]
Make a smaller measurement of time [milli-second, nano-second or femto-second etc and the triangle will be smaller accordingly]
But in our 1 second time based SI units of physics 1 second is a base unit and it gives us a quantum of Charge [1/12 the elementary charge]

Anyway, I'm making more progress, much more progress, but with that come a slew of other questions, and obviously I'm just providing you my thought process in hopes you can correct any of the errors in my thinking...

Indeed you are, most assuredly you are my most diligent student worthy of any time I can supply to help you understand Tetryonics in greater detail.
And I am most happy to supply it for you…KC

-=-=-=-=-=-=
Hydrogen has been dethroned as a foundation to the elements.

Deuterium alone can account for the Schrodinger wave numbers of periodic elements and provide a mechanism for the binding of protons and neutrons in atomic nuclei that the current atomic model fails to provide – as a result it is clearly demonstrated that there are no ‘excess neutrons contributing to atomic mass and each element has equal numbers of protons, neutrons and electrons in accordance with their atomic Z numbers.

---------------

In Tetryonic theory, the circles around Planck triangles are the region of space mapped out by light per unit of time [ie in 1 sec light radiates in 2 directions at c to form a circle with a radius of c, a circumference of pi [2c] and an area of pi[c^2].

You'll find lots of units like c^2, c^3 and c^4 within the maths of physics - only Tetryonic theory reveals what these terms really are [spatial coordinate systems based on the speed of light]

These c^2 [Euclidean], c^3 [Cartesian] and c^4 spherical coordinate systems based on the speed of light are used to geometrically differentiate planar ENERGIES from 2d mass and from 3D Matter in physics, clearing up much of the confusion of the existing mathematics.

I'd actually like to help others to overcome their conditioning and programmed mindset. I'm not here to get heated or confrontational, but to simply state how we see things differently. Those in the Tetryonics community have had to re-wire our brains a bit to come to terms with the errors of modern teaching.

I'm not here in support of modern theory/interpretation. I stand firmly against it. I am here to point out the glaring mistakes and assumptions of accepted theory to help the free thinkers (if any remain) to see past the veil of these errors, showing a way froward.

There are many points where Tetryonics corrects our assumptions of the past. This is not to say all math is wrong, but without the proper geometric relations, math doesn't even know what they are describing.

Equilateral Energy is the foundation to Relativistic math, and without this geometry, our human minds don't know how to interpret what the pure math is telling us.

Only by differentiating between Energy geometries, mass and Matter in physics can we progress and refine humanities understanding of our universe. If you think the modern approach and accepted notions are more descriptive in these areas, then by all means, I encourage you to stick with the norms.

I jumped ship a long time ago, and have been seeking a more logical operation to understanding physics for over 20 years. I am no longer in support of theories promoting black wholes, multiple dimensions, string theory, time travel, spherical point particles, electron orbits as previously understood, monopoles, Higgs Boson terminology-although we have our own way of describing what the Higgs really is, gravity waves, Fusion, and a host of other items that we will get to as the days, months and years wear on.

These posts are highlighting the errors of our ways, whether you see it that way or not.

We are beyond Einstein, and Tetryonics shows how to extend his assessment. We are beyond any notion that there is a warping of space due to massive bodies. Just because there is an experiment showing that light is bent when passing nearby massive objects, doesn't prove that space is warped by the presence of Matter.

We have another explanation. Light is refracted through the Secondary KEM fields of Matter in motion.

Space itself is just your co-ordinate system used, and space itself cannot have properties assigned to it other than the dimensional units required to define the co-ordinate system of your choice.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonic Theory only requires 3 dimensions of space [x,y & z] in which to create all the 2d mass- ENERGY & 3D Matter of our Universe [inclusive of all 1d Forces].

The Quantised Angular Momenta we are describing is not a rotational vector around a point. QAM in Tetryonics is the scalar are in the units of m^2/s per planck triangle.

mass.Omega = (kg.m^2/s) = Planck's constant (h)

QAM - [m^2/s] at the quantum scale, so long considered by physicists to be a vector rotation about a point is revealed to be in fact a TRIANGULAR geometry with the same dimensional units.

[SQUARED energies are in fact EQUILATERAL geometries]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From any angle Tetryonics is superior. I believe that the tetryon will be found....eventually...when someone with access to the data sets begins to search for them. Time will tell. Need I remind everyone, these are very early stages in public release. If you are reading this, then you have an opportunity to advance your understanding before the rest of the world catches on. You don't have to take my word for it. It's happening folks, but science progresses one funeral at a time as Max Planck explained long ago.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics posits that photons are refracted by EM fields near massive objects. Yes, light is bent, but not because 'space-time' is warped.

The GPS system is a test of SR not GR effect on photons of EM energy momenta. And Gravitational fields are not the result of 'curved spacetime' as supposed.

Only by geometrically defining and differentiating 2d mass from 3D Matter [in lieu of relativistic stress energy tensors] can science advance beyond the dogma of 19th century physics.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Within the Tetryonic material, Deuterium, NOT Hydrogen, is the building block of ALL the elements.

The new periodic table of elements brings together...

Quark configurations
Nuclei geometries
Chemical Bonding points
Atomic Orbitals
The Hund Rule
The Pauli exclusion
The Aufbau filling principle
Elemental names, numbers and
Elemental Families

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Paul Dirac said, the aim is “not so much to get a model of an electron as to get a simple scheme of equations which can be used to calculate all the results that can be obtained from experiment”.

Energy is an equilateral triangle.

Bosons are ODD pi mass - NOT MATTER

Photons are EVEN pi mass - NOT MATTER

Tetryons have 4 pi Matter Topology.

Quarks and Leptons are 12 pi Matter Topology. Although their final Matter Topology differs...both contain 12 pi Faces.

Mesons are 24 pi Matter Topology.

Baryons are 36 pi Matter Topology...3 quarks to form a proton or a neutron.

Hydrogen is found to have one electron and one proton, but the Tetryonics interpretation suggests that current theory is off in the rest mass value by that of 1/2 an electron.

---------

Digging in a bit further, 3 individual negative tetryons make an electron. That means there are 12 individual fascia within the Matter Topology of an electron.

Having performed the necessary calculations both forwards and backwards, Tetryonics came to define the exact number of Planck Quanta within each of these 12 faces.

The number of individual Planck Quanta in each face of an electron is 1e19. Multiply that number by the 12 faces and there are1.2e20 total Planck Quanta in every electron ( level n=1 electrons...energy levels typically range from n=1 to n=8 but can go higher under special high energy conditions ).

Planck mass is defined as 7.376238634e-51 kg

So now you multiply 1.2e20 Planck Quant in an electron x 7.376238634e-51 kg = 8.851486361e-31 kg representing the rest mass of a single 1n level electron.

Note: As the total Energy content of particles increase, the quantum level of their KEM fields increase as well. In turn this is reflected in their associated Compton Frequencies and deBroglie wavelengths.

The spherical model of an electron's topology is wrong.

-------------

Now for the proton. They are comprised of an up, a down and another up quark. Each quark has 3 tetryons so there are 12 total faces in each quark. 3 quarks then add up to 36 faces and each face is a 25 n level energy condition. Meaning that there are 25^2 = 625. We multiply 625 by the total faces of 36 and then multiply that answer by 1e19hv planck quanta to derive the total number of individual Planck Quanta in one Proton.

n level 1 = 1e19hv = n

Electrons have n=1=1e19hv Planck Quanta in their faces, but Protons have n=25=625x1e19hv in each fascia of their Matter Topology. Protons have a total of 36 faces.

625x(36faces in a proton)x1e19hv=2.25e23

Add the electron's total quanta to the proton's total quanta --- 1.2e20 + 2.25e23 = 2.2512e23

2.2512e23 represents the total number of planck quanta in a hydrogen atom. Multiply this number by Planck mass...

2.2513e23 times 7.376238634e-51kg = 1.6605388e-27

So Hydrogen will have and electron with 12 faces with n as level one defined by 1n=1e19hv planck quanta per level.

...and a proton with n=25 and a total number of faces being 36.

 

So 25^2 gives 625 pi radian geometries, and in the case of a level

7.376238634e-51 kg

7.376238634e-51 kg

 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Planck's Constant Derived from Theory The Tetryonic Approach

Tetryonic theory is founded on the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta, where the square quantum numbers of Physics are in fact equilateral geometries.

Planck quanta [kg*[m^2/s] is a measure of the Energy/sec [mass] of the quanta, and its quantised Angular momentum [qAm] m^2/s which is the direct result of its equilateral geometry [not a vector rotation about a point as it is classically described].

The qAm gives rise to all geometry at the Planck scale through Charge [which is the result of h/c^2 geometries].

These h quanta combine to create a 'fabric' of mass-Energy over the geometric framework that Charge interaction creates and the number of h quanta per charge fascia is what gives us the de Broglie, Compton frequencies, momenta etc of Matter itself.

mass-Energies are 2D planar EM fields and Matter is a 3D standing-wave geometry made up up [n]pi square number Planck mass-Energy geometries.

In the QM eBook you can follow the development of all fermionic Matter geometries from charged
Tetryons [4pi], Quarks [12pi], Leptons [12pi], Mesons [24pi], Baryons [36pi] etc
as determined by Weak & Strong force interactions between the Charged fascia of Planck mass-Energies.

Each geometry will have specific mass-Energy quanta contents for each n quantum energy level.
The Tetryonic UFE has the following basic structure Geometry * [mass-Energy quanta]

so Leptons are 12pi * n1 & Baryons are 36pi * 25^2 for their ground energy levels
resulting in 1.2 e20 for electrons - 22500 e19 for all Baryons [and for example 12 for Neutrinos]
This is all more clearly illustrated in the QM eBook in much greater detail for each particle type and family.

Of course the total charge fascia is what we measure as the net 'elementary' charge of each particle
electron [0 pos/12 neg charges = net neg 12 charge] - Protons [24 pos/12 neg = net 12 pos charge]
neutrinos [6/6 =0] Neutrons [18/18 =0]

Rest mass-Matter electrons have 1.2 e20 quanta [compton frequencies] and
rest mass-Matter Baryons have 2.25 e23 quanta [compton frequencies]

At some stage a decision has to be made regarding determining an exact value for Planck’s Constant – there are two paths to its determination.

1. An empirical measurement of the atomic weight of Carbon or Oxygen
[as was the case historically], or

2. A means of determining an exact value from theory must be developed.

Option 1 has the following problems:

It is an empirical measurement of quantum mass-Energies that cannot exclude the mass-Energy contributions to the measured system through sources of blackbody radiation, heat, kinetic energies etc. Even at Absolute Zero any means of measurement will, by necessity introduce energies into the system being measured in order to measure it.

Additionally, their remains the problem of obtaining an exact mole of any element free of isotopes etc that will affect the measurement and the determination of an exact value for any particular element.

Historically, Chemists used 1/12 of 12 grams of Carbon as the best estimate of an atomic mass close to that of a Hydrogen atom, while for a period Physicists sought to establish 1/16 of Oxygen as an alternative.

Both of these approaches are not accurate as all elements are made up of Deuterium nuclei not Hydrogen atoms with the result in either case being a weighted (or averaged) molar mass [with 1/2 electron masses]
Even the use of diatomic Hydrogen gas will introduce errors as the atoms will still have binding, and kinetic energies as well as elemental isotopes within the gas under measurement.

Many methodologies are currently employed by Physicists and Chemists around the World in an attempt to refine this value - many introducing addition constants and variables to the atoms under measurement.

Option 2 - Determining Planck’s exact mass-energy momenta value from theory

Tetryonics, offers an alternative, purely theoretical approach to that outlined above and historically used.

Using Tetryonic geometry we can quickly calculate from theory an exact Compton frequency of Planck quanta comprising the mass-energies of the REST Matter of any element or compound:

Leptons are 12pi charged geometries with n1 energy levels
E = h*[v=1.2 e20] e mass = E/c^2

Baryons are 36pi charged geometries with n25 energy levels
E = h*[v=2.25 e23] H mass = E/c^2

[Thus determining the exact rest mass for each particle , exclusive of any additional energies of Black body radiation – kinetic motion or measurement etc from theory alone]

We can now define Avogadro’s [N]umber to be the number of rest mass Hydrogen atoms in 1 gram (thus additionally implying that the inverse of Hydrogen’s mass will now also be equal to N)

Avogadro [6.022141579 e23] = N = [1.660538841e-24 g -1] H atom

From Tetryonic geometry we can use this defined mass for the rest mass of a single Hydrogen atom and divide by the Compton frequency of Hydrogen 2.2512 e23 [2.25 e23 + 1.2 e19] to determine a value for Planck’s Constant directly from theory [exclusive of weighting and other non-rest mass energies]

Solving for Planck’s constant from this rest mass of Hydrogen we get:
h = 6.629432672 e-34 J.s

This value is exclusive of any additional heat-kinetic energies and energies of measurement used and is the exact mass-Energy of a Proton & electron [not a P+½ electron using 1/12 C or 1/16 O methods]

Any deviation from this value must represent the energies introduced by any empirical measurement and/or the combined inaccuracies introduced by any measurement device or ill-defined physical constants used in determining the mass-energies of the system under study.

This value can then be applied in many additional ways, in conjunction with Tetryonic theory, to determine the rest and molar mass-energies of any element of compound and allow Chemists to determine the stored ‘chemical’ energies in any element or compound.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Scale Structure Theory Notes. Covert Scale Structures

Erwin Schrödinger who, in discussing the elemental or fundamental 'particles' of nature, states, 'The new idea is that what is permanent in these ultimate particles or small aggregates is their shape and organization...They are, as it were, pure shape, nothing but shape...'*

John Barrow sums up the eventual breakthrough in the history of math.

 

". . . something strange happened. These symbols were found to have a life of their own that dictated how they should be manipulated. And the ways in which they were used enabled new facts about the world to be predicted."

He goes on to note that the move to abstraction in mathematics (the concept of 'number' detached from 'numbers of things'), occurred when the method for recording numbers (the notation) reached a certain threshold of logical organization itself.

The key mathematical tool used by Einstein in his theory of Special Relativity was the theorem of Pythagoras.

In his theory of General Relativity, Einstein goes on to describe gravitation in terms of the geometry of space-time.

Although the capacity to count to four seems rudimentary, there was something quite abstract —a beguilingly simple idea —which served as the essential element without which, even this, would have been an untenable nonsense. Namely, the idea of the unit or quantum, the recognition of the wholeness and discreteness of an entity. Even words lose their meaning unless there is subsumed within language a presupposition of the unit —nouns make no sense unless there exist units or discrete things which may be ‘named’.

The idea of the unit is perhaps as close as we can come to the bedrock of all mathematics and thinking to follow. So fundamental is the unit to arithmetic that the Greeks did not consider "1" to be a number at all but rather the monad or indivisible from which all other numbers arose. Abstraction and the seeds of algebra were born here: 'let this animal be one'; 'let this finger or this stone represent that animal'. The recognition of unitariness went beyond a recognition of similarities. Counting things which are different meant you had to abstractly assign unitary value to each object.

The abstract concept of the unit was a key that opened up thinking as we understand it today. It formed a principle of connection among things that, superficially at least, appeared to be unrelated.

 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 

"Bosons [W and Z] are planar fields of charged mass-energy momenta [quantum inductive loops] - extensively covered in my Tetryonics QM eBook - and as such only posses x&Y components to their EM field geometries ....

ie they are MATTER-less fields just like photons.... the continued mixing and interchanging of physical terms such as mass & Matter for each other in modern physics is one of its greatest failings to date.

W+ & W- bosons are simply either charged side of Planck quanta of energy momenta and these charged bosons combine via the weak force [EM coupling] to create Z bosons and photons [each of which have completely distinct field geometries to each other despite both being neutral fields of mass-energy momenta]

As always with Tetryonics all the complex math and field equations currently in use present can be boiled down to a simple 2d geometry [or topology in the case of material 3D particles of Matter] with their geometric components of [square root] linear momentum." Tetryonics

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

 

"Now the work of accumulation begins again on a higher plane: the sensory organs keep steadily at work manufacturing percepts; the receptual centers keep steadily at work manufacturing more and yet more recepts from the old and the new percepts; the capacities of the central ganglia are constantly taxed to do the necessary registration of percepts, the necessary elaboration of these into recepts and the necessary registration of recepts; then as the ganglia by use and selection are improved they constantly manufacture from percepts and from the initial simple recepts, more and more complex, that is, higher and higher recepts.

At last, after many thousands of generations have lived and died, comes a time when the mind of the animal we are considering has reached the highest possible point of purely receptual intelligence; the accumulation of percepts and of recepts has gone on until no greater stores of impressions can be laid up and no further elaboration of these can be accomplished on the plane of receptual intelligence. Then another break is made and the higher recepts are replaced by concepts. The relation of a concept to a recept is somewhat similar to the relation of algebra to arithmetic. A recept is, as I have said, a composite image of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of percepts; it is itself an image abstracted from many images; but a concept is that same composite image--that same recept--named, ticketed, and, as it were, dismissed. A concept is in fact neither more nor less than a named recept--the name, that is, the sign (as in algebra), standing henceforth for the thing itself, that is, for the recept.

Now it is as clear as day to any one who will give the least thought to the subject, that the revolution by which concepts are substituted for recepts increases the efficiency of the brain for thought as much as the introduction of machinery increased the capacity of the race for work--or as much as the use of algebra increases the power of the mind in mathematical calculations. To replace a great cumbersome recept by a simple sign was almost like replacing actual goods--as wheat, fabrics and hardware--by entries in the ledger.

But, as hinted above, in order that a recept may be replaced by a concept it must be named, or, in other words, marked with a sign which stands for it--just as a check stands for a piece of baggage or as an entry in a ledger stands for a piece of goods; in other words, the race that is in possession of concepts is also, and necessarily, in possession of language. Further, it should be noted, as the possession of concepts implies the possession of language, so the possession of concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self consciousness. All this means that there is a moment in the evolution of mind when the receptual intellect, capable of simple consciousness only, becomes almost or quite instantaneously a conceptual intellect in possession of language and self consciousness."

Excerpt from Cosmic Consciousness by Richard Maurice Bucke
--------------

The task at hand is to re-wire our brains a bit. Understand that Tetryonics is unifying things in a geometric way, which has eluded the most amazing minds in history.

Tetryonics shows us the true Planck-scale geometry of the quantum world that makes up our Universe.

One ‘integer’ Omega unit is Pi radians and provides the geometric foundation for all of Physics.

All triangles are flat euclidian [pi] radian geometries [180degress].

Its foundational units are Pi radians.

Combined with mass [Energy/sec] it gives Planck’s Constant [h] in physics

Its geometry [m^2] per second reflects the unit of quantised angular momentum -- [QAM]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Through this effort, a deeper understanding of physics develops, and one that connects up to most of the scientific achievements from the past 400 years.  This is presenting a new interpretation, so nothing about this theory is going to make a lot of sense to the first time onlooker. A casual glance just won't cut it here.

This is an honest working of physics, but from the bottom up, whereas current models rely on a top down approach, simply recognizing patterns. The top down approach does not provide further insight into the actual mechanics at play.

As soon as I've hit 15 posts, I'll start to add in the imagery along with the commentary and the opportunity to understand this material will be more potent.

-------------

I'll continue to focus my efforts on highlighting a few of the key principles at work within Tetryonics. There is much ground to cover, and we're just getting settled in a bit before moving on to more complex concepts presented by the theory.
===============

"Did you just say 'squares' are triangles?"

Equilateral Triangles happen to tessellate, which means they can fill space without any gaps. The tessellation results in a 'square' number of triangles.

Geometry is King,

Math is okay,

English sucks!

---------------

There are three ways to look at geometry - mathematically, verbally and visually.

Of the three, Visually will be shown to be superior leading to understandings of Physics, Chemistry, Electrodynamics, and Gravitation, along with all their related physical properties.

-------------

"In mathematics, as in any scientific research, we find two tendencies present. On the one hand, the tendency toward abstraction seeks to crystallize the logical relations inherent in the maze of material that is being studied, and to correlate the material in a systematic and orderly manner. On the one hand, the tendency toward intuitive understanding fosters a more immediate grasp of the objects one studies, a live rapport with them, so to speak, which stresses the concrete meaning of their relations.

As to geometry, in particular, the abstract tendency has here led to the magnificent systematic theories of Algebraic Geometry, of Riemannian Geometry, and of Topology; these theories make extensive use of abstract reasoning and symbolic calculation in the sense of algebra.

Notwithstanding this, it is still as true today as it ever was that intuitive understanding plays a major role in geometry. And such concrete intuition is of great value not only for the research worker, but also for anyone who wishes to study and appreciate the results of research in geometry." -- David Hilbert -- "Geometry and the imagination"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Physics is geometry. One cannot be separated from the other.

---------------------

Tetryonics is founded on a single postulate - that the 'squared' numbers of math in physics are in fact reflective of equilateral geometries at the quantum scale.

The equilateral Triangle is unique in that it is the only polygon that can be tiled (or divided) and produce only identical geometries and square numbers. Thus it is eminently suited from the construction of fractals.

If we are brave enough to draw these triangles on a piece of paper, we can begin to grasp the "Square" nature of Equilateral Triangles. Or to put it another way, we can see how the 'square numbers' of physics are the result of the tessellation of Equilateral Triangular Units as they come together and form larger and larger Equilateral EM fields.

Draw a single Equilateral triangle on a piece of paper. This single triangle represents a single Planck Quanta, or a single Boson ( as 1 is an ODD number ), or we can call it a Zero Point Field and relate it back to Einsteins formulation of E=hf/2 -- meaning a half wavelength photon.

The first row, the uppermost triangle contains only 1 = ODD. This is a boson.

Now draw the next row. It will have 3 individual triangles, two pointing up and one in the middle pointing down. This next arrangement of 3 triangles in the second row down is also an ODD numbered Boson. When combined with the unit 1 triangle in Row 1, we end up with a "Square" number totaling 4.

--------------------

"Square" numbers result from the summing of consecutive ODD numbers. Yet another way to state this is to say that, "Any odd number can be represented as the difference of two squares." This is Fermat's understanding applied through geometry.

The third row down will have 5 triangles, also and ODD numbered Boson, and the total then becomes 9 or 3^2.

Each Row has an ODD number. Each Row is a boson and these are distinct from photons, and neither a boson or a photon is a particle. All these ODD numbers add up to "Square" numbers.

-----------

The tessellation of odd numbered equilateral triangles creates 'square' numbers. That is demonstrated with the Additive Summation Series below. It goes on forever...and ever...

1                     = 1 =   1^2

1 + 3                  = 4 =   2^2

1 + 3 + 5               = 9 =   3^2

1 + 3 + 5 + 7            = 16 = 4^2

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9         = 25 = 5^2

 

The square of the number n is equal to the sum of the first n odd numbers.

The square of the number n=1 equals the sum of the first n=1 odd number....1

The square of the number n=3 equals the sum of the first n=3 odd numbers....9

The square of the number n=4 equals the sum of the first n=4 odd numbers....16

The square of the number n=5 equals the sum of the first n=5 odd numbers....25

The square of the number n=6 equals the sum of the first n=6 odd numbers....36

The square of the number n=7 equals the sum of the first n=7 odd numbers....49

Need I continue?

----------------

What this series shows us is that "Square Numbers" are the result of the Successive Summation of Consecutive ODD numbers....So using consecutive ODD numbers as shown in the series above we show how this is in fact the case.

This jives with Fermat's difference of two squares...aha...! Really? No lights going off in your head yet?

It has only been in recent centuries that mathematics has begun to explore the higher order irrational numbers.

Tetryonics takes this investigation to new levels with the identification of equilateral geometries as the foundation of transcendental numbers and the physics of fields and particles in motion.

What mathematics has failed to appreciate is the significant application of equilateral geometries to the 'square' numbers of physics and science in general.

All triangles are flat euclidian [pi] radian geometries [180degress]

Mathematics without geometric grammar produces scientific gibberish.

---------------------

"The relationship between scalar mass-energy, linear momentum and quantised angular momentum is the result of the equilateral geometry.

Energy is the total Planck quanta per second.

EM mass is a scalar energy per unit of Time.

Charge is the nett Angular momentum per spacial co-ordinate system.

Kinetic Energy is the Electric field of mass-energy of Matter moving at v.

The general formulation of Planck's heat law E=nhv is now changed to a specific formulation of E=[ODD]hv for transverse quantum levels [Bosons].

Tetryonic geometry [n(pi)] redefines Planck's quantum formulation for heat energies, from a generalized equation of 2D energy momenta, into a geometric formulation for all mass-energy momenta in Matter.

All Equilateral (pi) geometries contain square number quanta." - Tetryonic Theory

---------------------

I'll stick to the unit's themselves. Perhaps this will shed some more light on this geometric perspective...

Velocity is a physical quantity requiring both magnitude and direction to define it >> v=m/s

 

Acceleration >> a = m/s^2

Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity.

In one dimension, acceleration is the rate at which something speeds up or slows down.

However, since velocity is a vector, acceleration describes the rate of change of both the magnitude and the direction of velocity.

Acceleration has the dimensions....

[Lenth]/[Time Squared]

In SI units, acceleration is measured in meters per second squared (m/s^2)

In classical mechanics, for a body with constant mass, the acceleration of the body is proportional to the net force acting on it. Newton's second law

Force is F = ma = kg.m/s^2

Additionally, for a mass with constant velocity, the energy of motion is expressed as its momentum...Acceleration causes changes in Energy-Momentum.

p=kg.m/s

There is no blunder with the square issue. I'm representing how Tetryonics views the situation.

Here's a big re-definition...Tetryonics shows the proper way to view and comprehend Quantised Angular Momentum.

When you draw a tessellated field of equilateral triangles, they sum to a 'square' number.

Take the SQRT of that number and you have the linear momentum.

Linear momentum is the square root of scalar energies.

Linear momentum represents the Scalar height of any equilateral field of mass-energy. So back to the 8^2 field...there are 64 total Planck quanta in that field and there are 8 Planck Quanta running up the center to the apex. Relating to p=mv and E=mv^2 can be related back to p^2=mv^2.

p=mv --- the 'v' in this equation relates to the number of triangles moving up the center of the triangle.
E=pv
E=p^2

Energy is mass-velocity squared...
E=mv^2
Energy can be expressed as the square of linear momentum.
p^2=kg.m^2/s^2=E as expressed in Joules which = the same dimensional units as mv^2=p^2
p=kg.m/s -- The vector square root of any equilateral mass-energy field.

"Spectral lines present what is possibly the best example of the impact of changing Newtonian linear momenta in quantum mechanics. Linear momenta [the square root of scalar energies] represented by the scalar height of any equilateral field of mass-energy and is represented accordingly in all illustrations with its vector direction of force being a vector arrow in the same direction."- Tetryonics

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

"...Many of history's greats were trained in the seven liberal arts. This form of learning back In the day was only offered to the "elite" or freemen. Liberal in this context translates to "free" and "books" The general public were not allowed to study this way, instead they were taught to become a worker and obey, so mainstream education then and now led children towards becoming a commodity by learning trade and how to fit into society. The seven liberal arts is split into 2 parts. The first part is trivium which means three paths that are one. It is the way of learning. The three sections of the trivium are, Grammar-Logic-Rhetoric. Grammar is understanding the components of a subject, (the who what when where) Logic is how these components go together (the why) and the rhetoric is how you use it or explain it put it into practice etc (the how) The second part of the seven liberal arts is called the quadrivium, which is the four ways of number. The four sections are arithmetic "pure number" geometry "number in space" music "number in time" and astrology "number in space and time" Basically the seven liberal arts is the process to understand things on a real level, how to develop critical thinking. This way of thinking obviously in past and modern society is discouraged, the world's leaders would not be where they are doing what they do if the public was classically trained in the seven liberal arts. I believe a solution is within this historical education. -Andy Taylor

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

In the equation [mass.Omega = (kg.m^2/s)] the OMEGA is simply present in the equation to show how the units expressed in Planck's Constant come about - Joule.seconds = kg.m^2/s

mass is energy measured over time....or can be through of as the Energy content per spacial measurement. There is no such thing as massless, and you can immediately correct anyone and everyone that suggests such a term...

This is another highlighting of how I can view the research of others, and get to the very bottom of where they have gone wrong. Matter-less makes more sense because EM waves are Matter-less, bosons and photons are Matter-less, but once the 3D tetrahedrons form...that is Matter. No other theory to date can or has offered us this definition distinction.

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/sciences/sociology/culture-and-societies/symbols-and-language-in-human-culture

In the 1930s, Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf proposed that languages influence perceptions. While this Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis—also called the linguistic relativity hypothesis—is controversial, it legitimately suggests that a person will more likely perceive differences when he or she possesses words or concepts to describe the differences.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics shows us the truePlanck-scale geometry of the quantum world that makes up our
Universe.

At first the theory was driven towards just matching existing mathematical expression in an attempt to understand what was actually happening at the quantum-scale and in turn driving our macro-scale physics.

But it quickly became apparent that a purely mathematical model of these interaction leaves too much room for erroneous assumptions and the entire formulation of the quantum processes turned to reflect and model the actualPlanckmass-energy geometries and their interactions.

This is not to say the mathematics is incompletely wrong, but it does not afford us the fullest picture of the mechanics at work at this scale, and in turn has let itself be molded as much by philosophy as a true understanding of the quantum processes.

As a result there are many little errors and misconceptions that pepper modern mathematical descriptions of the quantum scale physics that the rigid geometry of Tetryonic’s equilateral Plank energy momenta removes completely from the picture.

Nowhere is this more apparent than withPlanck’sconstant– the foundation of Quantum Mechanics itself - familiar to all who study it this foundational component of our Universe is revealed to be an equilateral quanta of mass-energy momenta [work] whose physical geometry is derived from its QAM [quantized angular momentum].

That is to say [m^2/s] at the quantum scale, so long considered by physicists to be a vector rotation about a point is revealed to be in fact a TRIANGULAR geometry with the same dimensional units. [SQUARED energies are in fact EQUILATERAL geometries]

Applying all this to say the Dirac equation for the free relativistic particle where:

• ψ = ψ(x, t) is the wave function for the electron,
• x and t are the space and time coordinates,
• m is the rest mass of the electron,
• p is the momentum, understood to be the momentum operator in the Schrödinger theory,
• c is the speed of light, and ħ = h/2π is the reducedPlanckconstant.

Accordingly, any wave-function, when fully illustrated is no more than a picture of all the equilateralPlanckquanta in any system under measurement. Tetryonics does this with ease [and intuitively if I say so myself] compared to the long complex multi-dimensional and often compartmentalized equations currently in use to describe the same system mathematically.

In Tetryonic theory many of these familiar mathematical operations and equations are reduced down to geometric representations of the component math from which it is born in a human attempt to describe it – if math is the language of Science, then equilateral geometry is its grammar’

Tetryonics QED delves into the geometric detail of the 2D quantum charged fields that go to make up the 3D rest Matter of the electron itself [along with its properties of Compton frequency, rest mass-energy-Matter, and magnetic moments].

And Tetryonic QED itself focuses in on electrical theory and the properties of photons in EM waves, along with their respective properties of 2D mass-energies, relativistic Lorentz corrections, Revealing in turn, the foundational relationship between QAM [equilateralPlanckmass-energy geometries] and all the physical properties of light – frequency, wave-length, probability-amplitudes & wave-numbers etc.]

For example, with regard to the Dirac equation for an ionized Hydrogen photo-electron moving in free space [with Lorentz corrections], there are many illustrations to be found in the Tetryonics [2] – QED eBook that show the exquisite quantum detail of each and every quantum step in the Hydrogen atom.

The geometry and geometric relationships of all of these physical properties are shown in the greatest possible detail in each relevant illustration culminating in an entire section in Tetryonic QED covering the Hydrogen spectral line series of Lyman, Balmer, Paschen, Brackett, Pfund, Humphries and a hitherto ‘unknown’ spectral line relating to the transition from n8-n7 within the Hydrogen nuclei’s orbitals.

These details are call contained in a series of 4 illustrations for each spectral series and show the geometric relationships for all the physical properties of spectral lines, their emission & absorption as well as the mathematical relationships for all these spectral line properties to the underlying geometry at work to produce them.
The relativistic spectral photo-electron illustrations were released last month and they detail all that is it possible to know about each electron, its rest mass-Matter and the relativistic corrections that apply to their changing KEM field energy momenta that produces their unique spectral signatures [to the 9th decimal place in all instances], making them more that capable of replacing and even enhancing Dirac’s mathematical model of the same.
All Space time co-ordinate systems are reduced to spherical co-ordinates based ion the propagation [speed] of mass-energy [light photons] in a vacuum, i.e. [c^2] for 2D planar mass-energies and [c^4] for 3D Matter components of the same system [c^2*c^2]

The 2D mass of any 3D Matter is simply a measure of its equilateral energies per c^2 and in fact it is the changes to the energy momenta of thesePlanckgeometries per c^n that provides us with our basis for the measurement of Time [i.e. Time [s] is a measure of the changes in QAM in a space-time co-ordinate system [m^2/s] * [s^2/m^2]]
Spectral lines present what is possibly the best example of the impact of changing Newtonian linear momenta in quantum mechanics. Linear momenta [the square root of scalar energies] represented by the scalar height of any equilateral field of mass-energy and is represented accordingly in all illustrations with its vector direction of force being a vector arrow in the same direction.

And finally Dirac’sconstant[or the reducedPlanck’sconstant] is shown to be a measure [or representation] of the diamond shaped electric field component of any equilateralPlanckmass-energy momenta field.

All of these properties and physical systems can be described in full detail using Tetryonic’s unified field equation [UFE] of mass-energy-Matter [meM] – Tpi [ [EoUo] [mΩv^2]]. Which in turn can in turn be reduced to the familiar Einstein-Planckequation for mass [nhv/c^2] with the appropriate manipulation of the math and an understanding of Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism.

It is natural for a formally educated scientist to ‘assume’ that as I have not related everything back to the ‘current’ mathematical equations of physics or that Tetryonics must be some form of pseudo-science that makes use of color filled geometries to entrance readers at the expense of substance.

NOTHING could be further from the TRUTH.

Tetryonics simply rebuilds our model [and understanding] of the quantum scale particles and interactions from its foundations and explains all the current math in geometric terms...... and along the way it re-structures the established math and corrects its foundational errors at every step where they are encountered.

This is not without its challenges, for in the process many established ways of modelling and viewing quantum scale events must be re-learnt in order to see their true physical reality and to extricate them form the morass of abstract mathematical equations that have been developed from assumptions over the past 400 years of science.
Never has there been [or likely to be] a clearer example of “A picture paints a thousand words”.