# Research Centre Two

Experiment #1 - the controlled release of mass-energy from Matter, Experiment #2 - the safe long term storage of energy as mass in inductive topologies... two key technologies in moving Humanity away from carbon fuels to a new sustainable energy technology.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The foundational priori postulate on which Tetryonics is built is that quantised angular momenta of Planck's constant [m^2/s] is in fact an equilateral [triangular] geometry not a 'squared' geometry as the math and texts suggest.

Using this single postulate many, many new discoveries and corrections can be made and modelled wrt modern theory

My eBooks contain numerous corrections to modern science assumptions and document a number of possible tests .....

QUANTUM MECHANICS

Tetryons [Matter quanta] hiding in the existing accelerator experimental data and mistaken for electrons or strange quarks on the basis of their identical mass-charge ratios...

The charge topologies of SM fields and Fermions themselves as well as the charge topology of all 120 periodic elements...

QED

A geometric explanation of electricity and electrical energy and the differentiation of charge and current along with an accurate geometric energy model for Rydberg's formula for Hydrogen and its extension to account for the spectral emissions of every periodic element as well as wave-particle diffraction experiments.

CHEMISTRY

A new periodic table based on these charged topologies that builds on the source and role of charge in physics to correct current models of fission and fusion and to marry Bohr orbitals and Schrodinger quantum numbers into a single 3D model of all elements [negative the spherical model and excess neutrons in the process]

COSMOLOGY

A geometric explanation and model of universal gravitation that not only accounts for the similarity between Newton's formulation for Gravity and Coulomb's formula for charge interaction but also explains gravitation on all energy scales [classical, quantum and relativistic]

MATHEMATICS

AND most importantly using the corrections provided by equilateral Planck geometries a unified field equation for all of the above that reveals the 'hidden' geometric constant within Planck's constant that allows mass to be differentiated from Matter in order to reveal the quantum geometries and topologies of energy on all scales in our Universe.... and to unify classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics into a single coherent theory....

along with many minor geometric correction to the erroneous false assumptions of mathematics regarding the underlying geometry that produces the mathematics we use to model physics in all these fields

Of course these are just dot points of all the major discoveries in the eBooks and do not even cover the new technologies that I am working on presently that arise directly from Tetryonic theory, which in due course will be released publicly.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The most important test which the theory of electronic configurations must meet, in order to satisfy the chemist, is that of providing an explanation for the periodic law,

It is quite obvious that any atomic theory that might be seriously proposed in the light of present factual knowledge must provide for some quantity corresponding to the atomic element number (and its associative properties): some quantity which, as Moseley says, “increases by regular steps as we pass from one element to the next.”

The mathematical expressions that have been derived from the experimental work are consistent with the currently accepted theories, to be sure, but they are equally consistent with any other theory which arrives at the same numerical values, regardless of the names which such other theory may attach to the units. Accordingly, since these numerical values are all related to quantities such as the atomic number or atomic [and/or molar] weight, for which any theory must furnish an explanation, agreement with the observed mathematical relations is no problem for any theory.

Developing mathematical models by extrapolating from known answers (or values) in lieu of building upon a sound foundational postulate and seeing where it leads is one of the most serious flaws in the modern approach to physics at the quantum level.

Whilst maths is the language of science, without the correct rigid geometry to serve as its guiding grammar it produces only gibberish

This means that when the scientific profession is faced with the difficult task of finding some other theory to replace the current theories of elemental chemical properties and their interactions, scientists can hardly be expected to welcome Tetryonics (or any new theory) against their long espoused, if erroneous views of Matter and its quantum level interactions.

Niels Bohr only added to the level of confusion that existed in Chemistry when he pointed out “that the electrons are able to occupy only certain specific orbits defined by quantum considerations, that they do not radiate while moving in these orbits, and that they possess the ability to jump from one orbit to another and, in so doing, to emit or absorb radiation with a frequency corresponding to the difference between the energy levels of the two orbits”.

Then Schrodinger added more erroneous assumptions to the modern quantum mechanical model of atoms when he told us that there really are no electrons in any specific orbit, with Heisenberg contributing by adding that there actually is no physical electron at all, only a “symbol,”. The whole Copenhagen school then goes on to insist that we cannot possibly hope to conceive of the elemental atom or any of its parts in anything but purely mathematical terms.

Chemists themselves then proceed to tell us just how many electrons there physically are in any atom and exactly how they are arranged in “shells,” etc., and proceeded on this basis to calculate the element’s chemical properties (to an accuracy of eight or nine significant figures).

This utterly ridiculous situation in which one group of physicists is defining specifically and in great detail the properties of entities which, according to an even more eminent group of physicists, have “no immediate and direct properties at all ” and do not even “exist objectively” is another example of the confusion that plagues ‘modern’ atomic theory

Any theory of atomic structure that should be given any serious consideration at all must necessarily make some provision for a quantity corresponding to the atomic number that accounts for all the observed phenomena and provides a physical basis for doing so.

The collapse of the ‘modern nuclear theory’ will make it necessary to discard all of these current interpretations and go back to the actual observed facts for a fresh start.

Tetryonic theory’s model of an elemental building block – a quantum-scale synchronous converter [Deuterium] - carries with it a “built-in” explanation of the periodicity & groupings of elements, as well as the observed quantum and chemical properties of all atoms and their bound electrons. This will permit the development of a new and entirely consistent theory of periodic chemistry directly from quantum theory itself, free of the necessary adhoc assumptions which have long been so much an integral part of ‘standard’ chemical models.

It is to be expected that the theorists working in this field will take a very dim view of this conclusion with the seemingly productive models of their (sometimes life-long) labors finally relegated to the wastebasket, but this issue must be faced nevertheless if our understanding of chemical processes is to advance further.

‘Even the highest degree of competence cannot derive the right answers from the wrong premises’.

Tetryonic chemistry is an adjunct theory that builds on the quantum mechanical & electrodynamical foundations already provided by Tetryonic theory and develops them into a consistent explanation of the larger-scale Matter & its stored kinetic mass-energies which has been sought since the development of Chemistry as a separate physical discipline of Science itself.

Tetryonic theory corrects the underlying false assumptions of Relativity..... photons are not 'bent' by gravity near massive objects [they are refracted by EM fields near massive objects].... The GPS system is a test of SR not GR effect on photons of EM energy momenta..... and Gravitational fields are not the result of 'curved spacetime' as supposed

Only by geometrically defining and differentiating 2d mass from 3D Matter [in lieu of relativistic stress energy tensors] can science advance beyond the dogma of 19th century physics.

============================================

Tetryonic theory like quantum theory itself is based on the Planck quantisation of energy-momenta, where quantised angular momenta of Planck's constant is a measure of its equilateral geometry [not a vector rotation about a point as is assumed presently] and each energy quanta has an associated square root linear momentum component.

As these Planck quanta tessellate [or fill] EM fields asymmetry is created between the positive and negative Planck quanta leading to the creation of charge at the quantum level of physics....

And the creation of divergent and convergent vector forces which in turn create the macroscale mechanics of Coulomb's Law of Attraction [or Tetryonic theory's Law of Interaction].

As more and more Planck quanta are added to each charged field [J/C] a Voltage is created and electrical work and where these extended EM fields of mass-ENERGY momenta overlap [or superposition] Forces can be effected....

Modelling equilateral Planck quanta geometries [QAM] as ideal short-circuited electrical inductive loops and their linear momenta as square root vector forces [mv] also provides an explanation for the inertial properties of mass in Matter topologies

============================================

Modelling the actual charged topologies of fields and particles has never been easier than with Tetryonic theory....

From a single foundational postulate - that 'squared' numbers in physics represent equilateral Planck geometries all the fields and particles of the standard model arise - including one new particle [the tetryon] hitherto mistaken for 4pi spherical point charges in physics and mistaken for bottom quarks and electrons in existing accelerator data....

By changing the assumed 4pi spherical 'point charge' of modern science to a tetrahedral Matter quantum many of existing paradoxes and mysteries of modern physics vanish.....

Don't believe it? Good, that's the scientific process at work.

You are welcome to make the models of each from the supplied Tetryonic templates....and challenge what you were taught about quantum theory by your educators.

============================================

Experiments to day to test SR & GR utilize EM waves and photons [2D radiant mass-energies] to test for the calculated effects - the math will produce correct net results for EM wave contractions and refractions but FAIL where assumptions are drawn from those results - ie length contraction must be re-termed Lorentz WAVE-length contraction as it only applies to 2D EM mass-energies [not Matter]

3D standing wave energy geometries [Matter] is not subject to Lorentz corrections (it does not contract as a result of accelerations) - only the 2D mass-energies in the secondary KEM field produced by Matter in motion is subject to Lorentz contractions.

Additionally, Tetryonics posits that all quantised energy is EQUILATERAL and it is from this geometry that charge is created in its 2 forms is created, going on the provide the foundation for the geometry of all mass-ENERGY-Matter in our Universe resolving many of the un-explained physical phenomena that we observe and measure today.

GR [formulated by Einstein as an extension of SR to account for accelerating/gravitating bodies], as such it suffers from his not defining mass-Matter in its earliest formulations [it only uses Tab= stress energy tensor].

To that end GR [8piG] is revealed to be simply Newtonian [4piG] + SR [4piKEM] corrections.

Again, failing to define and distinguish between mass & Matter lead to erroneous assumptions of what the mechanics were at work in GR - Einstein did NOT prove that light was bend by gravity close to a Star - he proved that Light [2D EM mass-energies] were refracted as they pass through the SUN's EM field subjecting it to SR [4piEM] corrections.

While you may continue to say the math is correct - relativity's mechanics, as currently explained in texts, is not.

The continued testing of GR theory with EM waves must be stopped of this delusion will continue to hamper and impede scientific progress for the next century.

===================

"Let no-one ignorant of geometry enter here" - Plato [387 BC]

'SQUARED' numbers in physics are EQUILATERAL energy geometries....

Maths - the supposed and highly vaunted 'language' of physics has been built upon a flawed assumption - namely that n^2 are 'square' numbers and n^3 are 'cubed' numbers.....

Tetryonics now offers several geometric proofs that correct all the math since Pythagoras, revealing right-angled triangles to be 'half-truths' as they relate to physics and science in general....

Understanding the tessellation of equilateral Planck energy momenta is key to understanding and uniting physics on all scales....

The first step to truly comprehending the mechanics of our universe

==========

Learning to count with Planck triangles [1]

ODD quanta sum to create SQUARE numbers

SQUARE numbers are EQUILATERAL geometries and

EVEN number distributions form Bell curve distributions of energy

with SQUARE ROOT vector Forces within their triangular geometries

ODDS - bosons

EVENS - photons

SQUARE ROOT - linear momentum

EQUILATERAL triangles of quantised angular momenta

A new geometric interpretation of the maths of physics is revealed.

=============

Learning to count with Planck triangles [2]

DUAL longitudinal quanta [bosons] are photons

EVEN number distributions of photons within EM waves

create EM Wave functions with SQUARE ROOT vector Forces

within their rhombic geometries

ODDS - bosons

EVENS - photons

SQUARE ROOT - linear momentum

Renormalizable EM wave functions result from the probabilistic distribution of Planck geometries within any electromagnetic wave

=========

Learning to count Triangular numbers [3]

Triangular numbers are the result of the series addition of n integers

[1]+2=[3]+3 =[6]+4=[10]+5=[15]+6=[21]........

To the Pythagoreans, the triangular number 10 was held in the highest esteem, and considered of supreme mystical significance. Its name, the tetraktys, meant literally “the holy fourfoldness”, representing the four elements: fire, water, air, and earth

Interestingly, twin triangular number sum to a 'square' number...

[1=3]=4, [3+6]=9, 6+10]=16, [10+15]=25, [15+21]=36

============

m = E/c^2 [mass-ENERGY equivalence]

Energy per second

m/c^2 = E/c^2/c^2 = E/c^4

Energy per second squared

E/c^4 = M [Matter]

A measure of 2d mass-energy contained and comprising in 3D Matter topologies...........

E/c^2 - planar measure of Energy per second.. 2d mass

E/c^4 - topological measure of Energy per second squared... 3D Matter

===============

In short m/c^2 = E/c^4 [or energy per second squared] a measure of the energy of Matter...

Einstein only gave half of the equivalence formula and no-one looked any further. since....

Now we have a full formula for mass-ENERGY-Matter equivalence and Tetryonic charge geometries allow us to visualise and difference each from the other..

This has big impacts on all the fields of Science.

==========

mass-ENERGY-Matter equivalence - an extension to Einstein's mass-ENERGY equivalence formula... [E=mc^2]

Showing E=mc^2 equates Energy to mass in a c^2 spatial region [Energy per second], while m/c^2 = E/c^4 relates Matter to energy in a c^4 spatial volume [energy per second squared].....

Combined with Tetryonic theory's charged geometries , it enables us to finally differentiate mass from Matter geometrically and mathematically from the vague Stress energy tensor [Tab] physics now utilises

==========

Deuterium nuclei [not Hydrogen with excess Neutrons to account for isotopic molar masses] are the quantum building blocks of all atoms and periodic elements.....

Tetryonic theory with its use of charged Matter topologies accounts for and explains how Protons attract and bind Neutrons to form all atomic nuclei, the non-linear isotopic curves of elements, spectral line emission and absorption lines and the quantum mechanical electrodynamics of atoms themselves [quantum synchronous convertors].....

Offering a superior quantum model of Nature at work.

===========================

An education today means you can repeat what your teachers taught you, it is not a measure of original or creative thought processes....

For too long maths has lauded itself as the foundation of physics, it is NOT.... it is simply a human construct designed by humans to describe things and processes they cannot see and as such is subject to all the limitations and weaknesses inherent in any human construct.

Equilateral GEOMETRY is the foundation of physics, it is what Nature employs to create all the mass-Matter and forces of our Universe without concern for human attempts to model it with mathematics...

There is a paradigm shift taking place in science today which will see maths replaced by Tetronic charge geometries so a new, more complete understanding of the mechanics of nature can be revealed and understood by all.

===========================

T-theory reveals that TIME is a measure of changing Planck energy geometries [quantised angular momenta] per spatial region.... d.QAM/c^2 = d.[[m^2/s].[s^2/m^2] = d.seconds

So as we perceive changes about us we sense and can measure elapsed time.

=====================

If old ideas are held fast in the face of better ideas discovered (or rediscovered) then that is not science at all. Science, or more accurately scientists, are those who pursue knowledge or seek to acquire knowledge via question (hypothesis) and experiment. In general, a scientist should be one who fearlessly seeks and accepts a new understanding of things through exploration of ideas, experimentation and reproducible outcomes.

Those who fail to do so are not holding true to the goal of science but are rather seeking to retain their grasp on, or understanding of, reality and how it is communicated to the wider world.

===================

The geometric Lorentz contraction of Planck mass-energy momenta in the KEM [Kinetic EM] fields of photoelectrons which led to Einstein's relativity theories.....

Sadly Einstein in SR extended the planck WAVE-length contraction of mass-energies to include Matter topologies in motion.... an oversight that has led to a major foundational flaw in relativity theory itself..

The stress energy tensor [Tuv] of relativistic mechanics treats all forms of mass-Matter as an ENERGY density/pressure gradient without regard for the rigid geometric properties of energy itsel

===============

The quantisation of scalar EM fields [heat, light, force] through the use of Planck's constant [h] lead directly to the development of Quantum Field theory [QM, QED]......

What was lacking from the mathematics developed to describe QFT was a rigid geometric 'grammar' leading to the inclusion of various false assumptions into modern quantum theory that can now be corrected using Tetryonic charge geometries to reveal the true nature and geometry of Energy at all scales of physics ....

Even the distribution of Planck quanta themselves within scalar EM fields offers a geometric solution to unifying QFT with classical mechanics and relativity [via Lorentz contractions] as well as explaining the source of the statistical probability math and mechanics of quantum theory itself... [normal distributions of energy momenta,

===================================

If you seek to understand from where the Universe derives its energy, what creates fields of Force and particles of Matter, and what drives their motion look no further than the second law of Tetryonics.........

All forms of Energy seek charge equilibrium

Every equilateral Planck quanta has two charged fascia,

The asymmetric tessellation of these 2d quanta in EM fields creates Charge

[leading the Law of charge Interaction],

Creating fields of Force throughout the Universe that move particles of Matter [whose 3D topologies are created by charge interactions],

Where Matter aggregates into large enough bodies (Stars and Galaxies) a GEM pinch [faux black-hole] is formed that 'collapses' 3D Matter topologies back into 2d radiant mass-energies to repeat the process that gave rise to Matter in the first place and to drive the mechanics of our Universe...

Only by differentiating 2d mass from 3D Matter using Planck geometries can we discern these fundamental truths of the Universe we live in.

========================

Modern science is stuck in a serious case of Confirmation bias.

Since the 1900 with the emergence of relativity theory [and its erroneous postulates about the Lorentz contractions of charged mass-Matter in motion], modern science and the math used to describe it has continued to accept ever-increasingly wilder speculations about the true nature of the observations of physical processes on many energy scales....

In short what the mathematics formulates to be true and what Humanity are interpreted as the causative agents of these processes and formulations is growing further from the underlying geometric truth of the matter day by day...

Field singularities, Quantum Uncertainty, Virtual particles, and Black holes are but some of the most glaring mistakes of modern science' current penchant or belief that maths is the 'language' of physics. Perhaps it may serve as a framework language to describe the underlying physical geometries at work - but it is Planck geometries themselves that serve as its 'grammar' and which reveal the true visual splendor of Nature at work on all energy scales...

Modern maths in physics is like the blind man with his walking stick who strives to describe the zebra he is prodding to all who would listen but not see for themselves..

=================

The charged topologies of Leptons in motion..... neutrinos, electrons, muons, and Tau leptons [all of which store their kinetic mass-energy momenta of motion in KEM field geometries]...

Note: the mass-energies of the Matter topologies of each particle is Lorentz invariant - only the mass-energies of their secondary KEM field are subject to relativistic corrections due to velocity changes...

ie neutrinos do not oscillate to become a different lower mass neutrinos and muons do not change into electrons.... they are always neutrinos and electrons but with differing relativistic mass-energies of motion stored in their KEM fields

================================

Abraham on Nassim Haramein's work...

....he has some insight, however he and others like him remain ever stuck on the spherical point charge, and that is in direct contrast to what Tetryonics is bringing to the table here.

It's an easy mistake because a sphere and a tetrahedron both share a 4pi gaussian surface curvature, so this is a perfect example of knowing the actual geometry and the foundation, when correct, can in fact lead to a novel approach to understanding gravity and so much more.

"You can calculate the proton radius for the same using Tetryonic geometry.

QAM = 0.0012m^2 [equilateral area]

Divide by the speed of light – 4.002769142 e-12 m

A Proton has a physic width of approx. 2 Planck triangles [allowing for angle of charged fascia]

= 8.00 e-12m

8.76 e-15 is the currently accepted value [1000 times smaller] but then they also claim that the electron orbits the Proton in the nucleus so that is to be expected.

Getting results that are close to accepted values only proves you can manipulate your model to achieve a desirous outcome [as in General relativity] and is not a sign that the theory is correct.

I know he hasn’t looked over Tetryonics as if he had he would have abandoned his work [or at the very least made major changes to it] – once people actually read Tetryonics instead of ‘cherry-picking’ illustrations out relating to their favorite topics then they soon realize the clarity and impact that it has- and that it is a theory that starts at the ground and works up in turn building a consistent unified model of the Universe and its mechanics." - ABRAHAM

A foundational postulate of Tetryonics explained...

Namely that Quantised Angular Momenta [QAM] is a NOT a vector rotation about a point [or spin or curl] as is assumed in modern physics.

It is widely know that QAM is a priori property of any Quantum Field theory [QFT] and it is assumed by mathematicians that its units [m^2/s] are reflective of a quantum scale vector rotation about a point [in either direction] on the basis that those same units in classical mechanics represent exactly that...

BUT suppose for a moment that what we assume and hold to be dear and true because we a taught is, is in fact not the case ....

Square metres [m^2] is just a measure of the surface area bounded by any geometric construct we chose - it can in fact be circular, triangular, hexagonal or any chosen polygon... modern physics assumed circular geometries and 4pi spherical topologies as this seemed logical and fitted the observable measurements to the extent that we could measure them... particles appear spherical due to their radiant EM energies and measurements of their force interactions... and EM fields radiate out producing circular wavefronts... allowing us to immediately draw connections and conclusions regarding them from larger scale objects in our Universe namely Stars and planets and waves etc...

But Quantum theory teaches us that all is not well with this picture - energy is quantised, atoms don't behave like planets and energy level changes occur only between 'squared' energy levels in atomic nuclei... what could be driving this discrepancy between classical mechanics we observe in everyday life and the quantum mechanics of energy at the smallest scales....???

Tetryonics suggests in its foundational postulate that energy [a hitherto nebulous entity in physics] in fact has an equilateral [triangular] geometry not a circular one... and from that single priori postulate a much greater and more coherent definition of QAM can be formed that in turn can be applied to fundamental physical properties such as Charge, mass, Matter and Forces in QFT.

This equilateral geometry serves two distinct roles in Tetryonics - firstly it provides a geometric basis for the creation of scaled models of all fields and fermions [as well as the observed and measured forces between them] as a result of their rigid geometry.... where it acts as a grammar for the language of mathematics where supposition rules due to lack of such models of the above.... AND it also can explain the inertial properties of mass within Matter topologies as being the result of the equilateral triangle behaving exactly like a quantum inductive loop of energy [albeit triangular] where due to its triangular geometries and component E&M fields energy can be 'circulated' or 'fluxed' within the geometry of each quantum just like an inductive loop of energy in electrical theory describes...

These equilateral Planck quantum of energy momenta [where the square root linear momentum is a median vector bisector and the QAM is the equilateral sides of the triangle itself] have equal but orthogonally defined scalar field of E&M energies which can 'flux' in either direction to create positive or negative charge fascia on each side of a equilateral Planck quantum or 'quoin'...

It is the interaction of the electric fields and magnetic dipoles thus created and described geometrically in deference to circular quanta that gives each Planck quanta its physical properties of inertial mass, quantised angular momentum, linear momentum, electric permittivity and dipole magnetic permeability which modern physics and QFT cannot explain [and conveniently side steps]......

It does not stop there as obviously as Planck quanta come together and interact via these equilateral EM geometries to determine not only the fields and particles that they can create but also the mathematics used to describe these entities and their physical interactions.... including the observed elementary charges and mass of each particle

Tetryonics uses ONLY equilateral geometry to explain charge, inertial mass, material Matter and all the force interactions of modern physics and in turn reduces the complexity of modern physics down to a simple exercise in cutting and taping paper triangles of Planck energies.....

In the process many additional new discoveries are made following this simple geometric postulate and reinterpretation of energy geometries leading to many other exciting corrections to modern theory on all energy scales....

Accurate 2d models of bosons, photons and EM waves are created as well as 3D Matter topologies of all fermions, periodic elements and compounds etc.... closely matching but at the same time correcting the models we are taught today... all of which are available to view and manipulate in real time as 3D CAD models.....

So, to summarise, Tetryonics builds successfully on equilateral triangles of Planck energy momenta to replace the existing disparate theories of classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics to create a coherent unified geometric theory of Everything....

The illustrations at the top of this thread relate directly to what I have just outlined and form just the tip of what Tetryonic theory has to offer modern science and our understanding of the natural processes of our Universe, I hope you take the time to take a closer look at them and to begin to comprehend the impact this geometry has for modern physics [and the maths used to describe it] along with the far ranging implications arising from this simple correction to what is presently assumed to be undisputed facts in science.

If maths if the language of science - equilateral Planck geometry is it's grammar

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

What happened to all the antimatter in our universe??

Tetryonics reveals that is in fact hidden within the charged Matter topologies of ordinary Matter - the hypothesis of our Matter centric universe being the result of an almost exact cancellation of Matter with antiMatter in the early development of our Universe beggars belief - even in today's physics where multiverses, black holes and virtual particles dominant theoretical discussions as they attempt to unite adhoc ideastogether in order to create a unified model of Nature's mechanics.

Either side of all Planck quanta making up all the Matter in our Universe is an equal but opposite charge of electromagnetic mass-energy momentum that gives rise to all the 2d fields and 3D Matter of our Universe.

Problem solved

The charged topologies of Leptons in motion..... neutrinos, electrons, muons, and Tau leptons [all of which store their kinetic mass-energy momenta of motion in KEM field geometries]...

Note: the 2d mass-energies of the 3D Matter topologies of each particle is Lorentz invariant - only the mass-energies of their secondary KEM field are subject to relativistic corrections due to velocity changes...

ie neutrinos do not oscillate to become a different lower mass neutrinos and muons do not change into electrons.... they are always neutrinos and electrons but with differing relativistic mass-energies of motion stored in their KEM fields....

Tetryonics posits that all Planck quanta have equilateral geometries as a result of their quantised angular momenta.... this a PLanck length is the square root median bisector of that same eq geometry [the physical length of its linear momentum if you like]....

Where T-theory deviates from modern theory is that calculating for this length produces a value of 4e-12m,[ which in turn is related to the quantum of EM charge and statcoulomb through c] and is nearly impossible to directly measure in the lab as this wave-length is constantly Lorentz contracted as energy is added or removed from any field or physical system under observation ..... ie it is more a theoretical value based on known values that changes all the time based on energy conditions and relativistic motions... thus is geometric relationship to wavelengths and wavenumbers produced by Rydberg's formula

https://plus.google.com/106525008644522085755/posts/X6VaDLhooqj

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So you get to say the world is they way I think it is because somebody told me - and I don't have to offer support for my position - I THINK NOT..

Please elaborate.... on this new invention of yours

WE still await your explanations of the same things I have supplied information on...

Show me your particle topologies, explain how charge is created and the role it plays in physics - these are fundamental questions regarding quantum mechanics - surely you can explain these simple key properties using your highly vaunted Standard model...

When you do everyone will see the errors of your model and prove my point....

AS to the mass of any particle that is a breeze (using my unified formula of mass-ENERGY-Matter T[hv^2]) and I've offer to supply you not some but ALL the rest mass-energies for each and every one of the 120 elements in the periodic table, including the subatomic particles that create them - ONCE YOU SUPPLY YOUR ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS YOUR ALREADY ASKED....

In fact all those values are readily available for each and every sub-atomic particle and element on the web now and in my eBooks

I am familiar with the Standard Model [and all its failings which you fail to recognise] - in fact my first eBook QM sets to work correcting all those errors, which you would know had you bothered to read it before commenting

You continue to say I am not familiar with the SM [for reasons only you would know] when in fact it is you who has failed to provide ANY evidence of its validity and correctness on both your own chosen topic and the few I have asked for [Charge, CP violation, rest mass of all elements, etc]

And here you are again repeating your statements and failing to answer a single in kind....

Meanwhile, you're trying to get support for your model, and unable to even come out and make basic answers like "The Foobar Particle is predicted to be 917MeV, and have such-and-such interactions".

Your words not mine - is it in your SM?

I have answered ALL of your questions while it is you who has refused to do likewise on basic physics... come up cough it up.

Explain CHARGE [its source and role in quantum mechanics] if nothing else - for it is a basic fundamental property of physics even in your highly vaunted and much proclaimed standard model... should be easy for someone of you exceptional knowledge and skills.

All my work is published and available including the answers to the charge question and the absolute rest mass-Matter of each and every element - yet we still wait for your answers while you prattle on and make stuff up that is off topic in an attempt to distract from you inability to provide your explanations to the same questions you put to me...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Defining Matter and antiMatter by the nett ELEMENTARY charges of particles is problematic

While the electron is negative - the proton is positive so who is to say that we are Matter [it is only our definition of us being comprised of Matter that defines us to be so - with no real understanding of the role of charge in this matter - after all antimatter only came into existence in the 1950's once PAM Dirac realised that the universe is made of two charges and should be accounted for mathematically]

On the basis of Protons being positive [+] and so as they are greater in mass we are antiMatter I could easily argue that positive charges are positive Matter and negative charges [electrons and anti-protons] are what constitute anti-Matter

In which case Matter and antiMatter are forms of each other - which is how they are defined under mathematical treatise and equations.

The current definitions of what is Matter and antimatter based on charge are simply lacking... and ultimately fail as electrons [- Matter] are attracted to protons [+ Matter] and equally positrons [+] are attracted to anti-Protons [- Matter].... making Matter and antiMatter interchangeable depending on your definition

Note also that irrespective of whether a particle is Matter [Proton/electron], antiMatter [Negatron/positron] or even Neutronium [Neutron/neutrino] they emit exactly the same photons of light making it impossible to differentiate one form from another at a distance...

AND Matter does NOT annihilate antimatter upon contact [Mesons and Pions are evidence of this 'fact' being wrong - even if physicists conveniently ignore it while continuing to promote Matter -antiMatter annihilation as a physical reality]

Rest assured Tetryonic theory and its charge geometry will never lie to you in such a way....

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

What happened to all the antimatter in our universe??

Tetryonics reveals that is in fact hidden within the charged Matter topologies of ordinary Matter - the hypothesis of our Matter centric universe being the result of an almost exact cancellation of Matter with antiMatter in the early development of our Universe beggars belief - even in today's physics where multiverses, black holes and virtual particles dominant theoretical discussions as they attempt to unite adhoc ideas together in order to create a unified model of Nature's mechanics.

Either side of all Planck quanta making up all the Matter in our Universe is an equal but opposite charge of electromagnetic mass-energy momentum that gives rise to all the 2d fields and 3D Matter of our Universe.

Problem solved.

Richard re-wording of materials.

My hope, as an independent researcher, is to bring together facets of a changing world so that we may pass through the doorways of discovery with the least amount of turbulence.

Growing pains can be awful, but once we are through that phase, a breath of fresh air and opportunity for real and lasting understanding can take hold across the planet.

A Paradigm is a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them. Not everyone shares them where mainstream physics is concerned.

I would agree that a paradigm shift of unlikely proportions is upon us, and I whole heartedly disagree that "the ground moves slowly."

What I'm finding is that there are a group of people moving and advancing our understanding at such a rapid pace, it's unprecedented how quickly things are happening now.

Most of us don’t even know the transition has been made, or that the corner has been turned. I believe that it has.

It is up to us as individuals in all our fields of endeavor to break free of the chains of education, and to use our intelligence to create a better understanding of our Universe.

Geometry rules our Universe not math.

While mathematics is the language of science it remains a language that lacks a well defined physical model on which to test it and further its many and varied solutions to quantum mechanics. it is this lack of any rigid, enforceable geometry [grammar] that has allowed the flourishing of numerous statistical and probabilistic solutions to the physical problems in turn impending our scientific advancement of quantum processes.

Tetryonics offers the world a gift, but so many 'experts' in the field won't even spend 3 minutes with the material before passing judgement, and we all wonder why process is so painstakingly slow. It's heartbreaking in all actuality. Do we want answers, or not?

Humanity has shifted, and all I'm doing is trying to share knowledge. Tetryonics has nothing to sell, only wisdom to share. The lips of wisdom are now closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Selections for "The Tao of Physics" - and although is quite outdated in it's assessment of quantum mechanics as it is understood today, still holds some nuggets of information and quotes that can help us along the way.

"The combination of mathematics and theology, which began with Pythagoras, characterized religious philosophy in Greece, in the Middle Ages, and in modern times down to Kant . . . In Plato, St Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz there is an intimate blending of religion and reasoning, of moral aspiration with logical admiration of what is timeless, which comes from Pythagoras, and distinguishes the intellectualized theology of Europe from the more straightforward mysticism of Asia." -- Bertrand Russell

The mechanistic view of nature is thus closely related to a

rigorous determinism. The giant cosmic machine was seen as

being completely causal and determinate. All that happened

had a definite cause and gave rise to a definite effect, and the

future of any part of the system could-in principle-be

predicted with absolute certainty if its state at any time was

known in all details. This belief found its clearest expression

in the famous words of the French mathematician Pierre Simon

Laplace :

"An intellect which at a given instant knew all the forces

acting in nature, and the position of all things of which

the world consists-supposing the said intellect were vast

enough to subject these data to analysis-would embrace

in the same formula the motions of the greatest bodies

in the universe and those of the slightest atoms; nothing

would be uncertain for it, and the future, like the past,

would be present to its eyes."

The philosophical basis of this rigorous determinism was the

fundamental division between the I and the world introduced

by Descartes. As a consequence of this division, it was believed

that the world could be described objectively, i.e. without

ever mentioning the human observer, and such an objective

description of nature became the ideal of all science.

Heisenberg wrote :

The violent reaction on the recent development of modern

physics can only be understood when one realizes that here

the foundations of physics have started moving; and that

this motion has caused the feeling that the ground would

be cut from science.

Einstein experienced the same shock when he first came in

contact with the new reality of atomic physics. He wrote in his

autobiography:

All my attempts to adapt the theoretical foundation of

physics to this (new type of) knowledge failed completely.

It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under

one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon

which one could have built.

The discoveries of modern physics necessitated profound

changes of concepts like space, time, matter, object, cause and

effect, etc., and since these concepts are so basic to our way

of experiencing the world it is not surprising that the physicists

who were forced to change them felt something of a shock.

Out of these changes emerged a new and radically different

world view, still in the process of formation by current scientific

research.

In the words of Ashvaghosha,

When the oneness of the totality of things is not recognized,

then ignorance as well as particularization arises, and all

phases of the defiled mind are thus developed . . . All

phenomena in the world are nothing but the illusory

manifestation of the mind and have no reality on their

own.

This is also the recurring theme of the Buddhist Yogacara

school which holds that all forms we perceive are ‘mind only’;

projections, or ‘shadows’, of the mind:

Out of mind spring innumerable things, conditioned by

discrimination . . . These things people accept as an

external world . . . What appears to be external does not

exist in reality; it is indeed mind that is seen as multiplicity;

the body, property, and above-all these, I say, are

nothing but mind.

In its most ancient meaning, it signified the pattern in

things, the markings of jade or fibres in muscle . . . It

acquired the common dictionary meaning ‘principle’,

but always conserved the undertone of ‘pattern’ . . . There

is ‘law’ implicit in it, but this law is the law to which parts

The of wholes have to conform by virtue of their very existence

I Tao of as parts of wholes . . . The most important thing about

Physics parts is that they have to fit precisely into place with the

other parts in the whole organism which they compose.7

It is easy to see how such a view led the Chinese thinkers to

the idea which has only recently been developed in modern

physics, that self-consistency is the essence of all laws of

nature. The following passage by Ch’en Shun, an immediate

pupil of Chu Hsi who lived around A.D. 1200, gives a very

clear account of this idea in words which could be taken as

a perfect explanation of the notion of self-consistency in the

bootstrap philosophy:

Li is a natural and unescapable law of affairs and things . . .

The meaning of ‘natural and unescapable’ is that (human)

affairs and (natural) things are made just exactly to fit into

place. The meaning of ‘law’ is that the fitting into place

occurs without the slightest excess or deficiency . . . The

men of old, investigating things to the utmost, and searching

out Ii, wanted to elucidate the natural unescapableness

of (human) affairs and (natural) things, and this simply

means that what they were looking for was all the exact

places where things precisely fit together. Just that.

An elementary particle is not an independently existing unanalyzable entity. It is, in essence, a set of relationships that reach outward to other things?

The world thus appears as a complicated tissue of events, in which connections of different kinds alternate or overlap or combine and thereby determine the texture of the whole.

"It is probably true quite generally that in the history of human thinking the most fruitful developments frequently take place at those point where two different lines of thought meet. These lines may have their roots in quite different parts of human culture, in different times or different cultural environments or different religious traditions: hence if they actually meet, that is, if they at lease so much relate to each other that a real interaction can take place, then one may hope that new and interesting developments may follow."

-- Werner Heisenberg

thus the Ashvaghosha states:

When we divide some gross ( or composite ) matter, we can reduce it to atoms. But as the atom will also be sbject to futher division, all forms of material existence, whether gross or fine, are nothing but the shadow of particularisation and we cannot ascribe any degree of ( absolute or independent ) reality to them.

### This is a work in progress and will be updated at time permits. This is basically for searching the raw text.

### Principles of Nature - Scale Structure Theory

Guerilla Open Access Manifesto

July 2008, Eremo, Italy

"Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything up until now will have been lost.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them? Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable.

"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal — there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's already being done: we can fight back.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by the publishers and sharing them with your friends.

But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.

Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who can make copies.

There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public culture.

We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access.

With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us? " Aaron Swartz [1986-2013]

Tetryonics will, and has done so by reserving the copyrights to a new unified understanding of the mechanics of our Universe and releasing this information freely to the entire World so all may benefit from this major advance in scientific knowledge.. thus preventing those who would attempt to patent and sequester such knowledge at the expense of others from doing so..... ABRAHAM [2008]

From Andraz,

Your name is going into history books Mr. Blankenship

Dear Richard,

as I told you I again engaged into studying your and Abraham's quantum geometry of Tetryonics and as I was reading your last post a huge bulb lightened under my skull. I first had an Internet blackout as the universe again shifted into a higher complexity while I have been looking at your triangular Quantum Probabilities Distributions and saw that the probabilities are the square of the amplitude. The basic concept of Prospect Theory uses a value function and a probability weighting function. I never deal with the latter as I always know in advance what will happen, and if not I can adopt the game into my favour, but from the descriptive point of view, Abraham and you are providing the greatest discovery ever to be made still on the human soil. The Cumulative approach to Prospect Theory already uses the polynomial weighting function.

Today I have been arguing with Dr. Jack Sarfatti a friend and a 1939 relic among hippie physicists who has sent me an article about all sorts of particles and their spin. I told him that this is a blunder and all we have are waves of energy/heat/electricity and their probabilities. I do not exclude torsion waves to which he agreed they exist. He was upset and said quote, "ok I will no longer cast pearls before your swinish mind u r hopeless." well I respect this and have sent Jack an e-mail on how his retro-causality is contributing to falsifying 3 Nobel Laureates and their work on Mechanism Design through my E=mQ² equation. I will now have peace from Jack for a while.

Back to business. In Zeeper terms I wrote E=mQ² as E=q x AZ x AZ² x AZ x AZ² / Z² this means that E=mc^4 is in fact:

Power x Heat (Power of thoughts in physical terms)= Electrical-Quantum-Mass (aether) x Linear Velocity x Linear Distance (Heat) x Angular Velocity x Angular Distance (Heat) x Linear Frequency x Angular Frequency = Electric Charge (Force) x √(c x h_bar x G) = mass x heat² x 1/time² (in short terms)= mc^4 Einsteins original formulation where any body transforms into pure energy and 90% of brain gets asserted, the equation of next level evolution of Ascension.

As Abraham and you state that probabilities are square of the amplitude at x/n² I have the answer here why Frequency of any Heat emission, body, brain or our star sun, must get squared to 1/t² or 1/Z² in Zeeper terms as time seems to be probabilistic. If time is truly polynomally probabilistic (in fact non existent) then anything can happen anytime as described in singularity or Novelty as of Terence McKenna.

Now all probabilities normalize to 1 so that:

E=q x AZ x AZ² x AZ x AZ² / Z²

E=qA^4 which is a double motive power for W=Q² as Q=Force, Lord Kelvin says that force squared is Motive power, the power of thoughts and rhetorics goes higher to hyper or the fourth power of the Force or Electric Charge.

so 2W=Q^4 proving that we exist here and in the infinite realm at the same time for ones, individual force x ones rhetorical force is 1W and 2W is a twin of us!

Q=F is the same thing or Electric Charge and Force are one and the same.

What is preventing us from that is our fear based mind and some few who are retaining status quo. I talk about those very poor who all they have is only money.

Now what do you think from your perspective?

Best,

Prof. Andy

Below an image of the cumulative prospect theory weighting function!

Concerning Prof Andy's last set of questions, Abraham has graciously responded with the following information.

""In a short reply to the topics covered in this email, the simple answer is YES, you are making the right connections…. Great to see...

The probabilistic distributions of Planck quanta of mass-energy momenta in any equilateral charge EM field always form a normal [Bell curve] distribution – and it is this very same distribution that is the foundation of statistical mechanics in quantum theory [see last illustration].

In other words all the higher level math currently utilized in quantum theory is in fact a reflection of the geometric distribution of Planck quanta at that level of physics.

‘SQUARED” energies are in fact EQUILATERAL field geometries.

SQUARE ROOT linear momentum is the HEIGHT of these same EM fields and

DIAMOND e-field [Eo] Electric scalars are 1/2Mv^2 with

Dual equilateral fields [Uo] forming Magnetic dipole moments in the same fields[1/2Mv^2]

And CHARGE is simply the asymmetric distribution of Planck quanta in any EM field of Force.

I’ve attached a few simple illustrations straight out of T-theory QM eBook that I trust will aid in illuminating these points for you.

In essence the differences between your graph provided and the last illustration I provided reflecting the same is that my illustration models the actual physical tessellation and distribution of equilateral Planck energies in EM fields that you measure and plot certain physical aspects of in your co-ordinate system

As Richard points out T-theory shows that care must be taken to differentiate between Linear momentum and E-field components, mass & Matter and to recognize that fact that even net divergent EM fields of Force contain a convergent component [in all cases]….. this modeling can be extended into all areas of physics as shown in my 5[/7] eBooks released so far

And these points, along with the mistaken notion that quantised angular momenta [QAM] is a vector rotation about a point as it is our macro world leads to a number of presumptive errors in modern physics – QAM in fact is an equilateral geometry in a radial time based co-ordinate system [leading me to what I think is the point you are try to make in your email]….

IF c [the propagation velocity of EM energy in a vacuum] is taken to be a constant and utilized as the foundation of a spatial co-ordinate system per unit of time [light seconds etc.] then it becomes easy to develop Force vectors, radial planar, Cartesian and spherical co-ordinate systems for energy in all its forms in order to define and differentiate between 1D vector Forces, 2D mass-energies & 3D Material objects in physics [as illustrated]

In doing so we can also begin to re-phrase and unify Newtonian terms with Quantum and Relativistic Mechanics so they may be interpreted and understood with respect to each other.

In short v/c = vector motion / unit of time; c^2 = 1 second; and c^4 = seconds squared.

Those familiar with Newton’s work will now see the nebulous term seconds squared [in acceleration for instance] actually can be directly equated to c^4 found in relativistic math [in particular GR] and that v/c is simple Lorentz WAVE-length corrections for 2d mass-energies moving slower that c within those same spatiotemporal co-ordinate systems just mentioned.

Once this is understood by all it becomes an easy matter to model the geometric distributions of equilateral [square] Energy quanta and their motions over time within those time based co-ordinate systems to define and differentiate between mass & Matter on all scales of physics.

And indeed that is what Tetryonic theory does, in turn revealing that Einstein’s E=mc^2 is in fact a mass-Energy equivalence formula while E=Mc^4 is in fact an equivalence for Matter-Energy.

This is a major aspect of physics - 2D [m]*** is NOT 3D [M]ATTER - that is not reflected in math

And the continued blind mathematical equating of one to the one in physics is one of my pet peeves….. and only serves to highlight ignorance within the current mathematical interpretation and modeling of physical processes at all energy scales.

In short Energy per second [E/c^2] is mass;

And Energy per second squared [E/c^4] is Matter

(or mass [E/c^2] per second [c^2])

Relativistic stress Energy tensors are simply inadequate at differentiating mass & Matter by design

Finally, Electric field permittivity [Eo] and vector Forces/Work can be easily related using these very same geometric premises [as illustrated] but with T-theory’s geometric approach clearly differentiating again between the two distinct properties and their formulations.""- K.C. Abraham

====From Andraz,

Thanks Richard and K.C. Abraham,

This was the last missing puzzle in my struggle to understand the normalization process of probabilities. Planck units can get normalized to one, yet in fact it is the time that normalizes all functions over time and time itself is a probability or dummy variable.

I now also understand the concept of aether mass that is invisible and mass as matter the way we see it.

The concept of E=mc^4 is more clear to me and has a very broad application.

I have now coined a new veda called "Sapiedelic Mechanics" and will elaborate on that.

Thanks for presenting Tetryonics and be blessed for all the good work you do to the world.

Best,

Prof. Andy

================================================================================

Comments awaiting moderation. If my tetryonic comments are not approved these sites are completely removed from my efforts to communicate the theory, and I move on to others with more opened minds.

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-paradigm-shift-you-didnt-notice.html

http://news.discovery.com/space/another-glimpse-of-new-physics-at-the-lhc-140607.htm

http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_hydrogen_bonding.html

http://rwgresearch.com/

http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=440.0

===================

From the video... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=762qyWobffA

Response from

MX6Maximus

I "get it" but I have some issues with the (conceptual) semantics in it. Firstly; thank you for commenting. I appreciate feedback. In the video is mentioned "E=mC^2" and if we're to have a 'real' understanding I would lean more to "E=1/2(mV^2)", the kinetic term since it is indeed 'real' as opposed to "C" being defined as "The speed of light in space vacuum" and "Vacuum" defined as "Space devoid of matter" which is impossible in reality. Once I hear "E=mC^2" I tend to get 'turned-off' but I will watch the video in its entirety out of respect. A study into "Tetryonics" should be valuable considering Tesla's quotation of "Energy, Frequency and Vibration." I would suggest changing perceptions between the usage of "equilateral triangle" and "equiangular triangle" from plane to depth. The purpose of my video was to keep Tesla's patent, the working model as simple as possible in understanding without the 'messy deep-thought & knowledge' that befuddles young experimenters and rediscoverers. I await the day when the very knowledgeable replicate a working model and say "EUREKA!.....I DID IT!....LOOK AT ME!....wait....Tesla knew what he was doing....ALL HAIL TESLA!...wait...he got it from Volta...he got it from someone else...Bible...pyramid...crap....this is nothing new..." *blush

=========================

https://concen.org/content/2014-secret-teslas-power-magnification-jim-murray-and-paul-babcock

=========================

With a great Respect for the Work of our Vice President CEO Richard Blankenship ...

Dear team & collaborative groups, distinguished visitors,

It is our great honor to present the first news from a new collaborative establishment; http://forallkind.tetryonictheory.com/

As of Andy's mission from 1987 after reading his first children's sci-fi novel, our task is to spread the idea of no war, peace, self betterment and moneyless society. In the world where fiscal remuneration is not present which is nowhere, creativity and knowledge are not suppressed, ideas are being exchanged, new concepts born and we make progress in peace. Children attain wisdom, become sapiedelic at very early age instead of sitting in trenches and waiting for an order to seek and annihliate either through 3D computer games or in the filed for some insane govermental interests. Richard and Andy became great friends as they have been exchanging ideas on implementation of Zeeper's physics of gravity and geometry into Tetryonics and Andy's Prospect Theory based E=mQ² equation of thought velocity and frequency. Recently we gave birth to some photon ideas being a heat wave and no particle with opposing +/- poles that could annihiate and create null space resulting in Zeeper's pressure model of gravity, quote: Bankenship. Richard has designed a new homepage from where we intend to use some quotes for this event section article. We seem to discover the very core of all knowledge and wisdom Nikola Tesla liked to speak about.

Quote Blankenship: ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE... Do you realize and acknowledge your own potential? If you do, and have been wondering how you can reach your goals, increase your awareness of the world around you, and help others along the way, then I welcome you to "NO LIMITS." This is the place to take comfort in the fact that we are all a work in progress, and that we should never stop learning. As we constantly redefine who we are and what we want to be, we often find that others are content with the comfortable nature of their seemingly normal lives. I am not one of these people. I recognize that life is a precious gift to be enjoyed, honored, and cherished, and I am attempting to help others to realize this same understanding within their own lives. This is a place for me to post many of my findings, writings, and approaches to life that have made it all worthwhile. Despite the chaos of our world, we can learn to overcome how we react to it, so that we can pursue a more harmonious relationship to all things, all people, and all concepts. Eventually everyone has something of value to offer, but the problem is that too many are set in their ways, and to be honest most people don't really communicate with one another. They are too busy attempting to promote their own agendas rather than finding and pursuing the greater unfolding Good.

These are great thoughts of a great thinker Richard Blankenship who read all Andy's essays and papers, yet he had his own concepts that are now being upgraded and upgrade our concept, a clear proof that we humans are compelled to better ourself and not to enslave each other for money or other items of some illusive value. As of Andy's essay on a new scientific discipline page 88 GS-Journal, our world runs on all sorts of collapsing systems that are now subjected to the final truth and a need to bring a New World Eononomy to every home. www.forallkind.com and Richard'shttp://forallkind.tetryonictheory.com/ are laying foundations for this concept that has it's routs in Gene Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek universe. Our concept goes beyond that as we have put all starships and rockets into museums and work for all kind even beyond where life forms are not organic or Carbon based anymore.

Quote Blankenship: Wisdom of the Ages; Unlimited Potential Surrounds Us... It has long been thought that there are secrets worth keeping and secrets worth discovering. In the annals of history there have been many phases of human thought and endeavor. The greatest discovery of all time is that of our co-creative nature with a field of energy so vast, so abundant, that most can't wrap their minds around it. Any attempt to do so will instantly change the way you view the world, and in turn how you operate in it .If there was ever a time to stumble upon what is true, right, and good, it is now. With the advancement of thought and technology creeping into the homes of millions around the world, it is my hope that I can contribute to your knowing what it is all about. Discovering yourself is tantamount to helping society as a whole to improve upon the foundation that the human spirit has attempted to convey to every one of us.

Human potential exceeds that of Gods and already Shakespeare knew that. All these quotes form Richard prove what Andy saw, a world or superabundance where our true selves and all kind had already upgraded the Internet to Thinknet, Microwaves to Replicators and Transporters for beam me up Scotty purposes to Blinporters. Latter deliver any person or object to any temporal or spatial dimension at the speed of thought which is infinite according to Nikola Tesla. Here we have a perfect concept of the heavens as we exist here and there at the same time.

Thanks Richard for this magnificent work on your homepage. We will follow your updates.

Best wishes,--Prof. Andy

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

http://www.forallkind.com/ is assembling and we invite you to collaborate with us!

Collaboration section disclaimer! (please read)

This opened section is promoting any kind of business, any entrepreneurial activity and any attempt to provide masses with the truth about our existence, free energy and means that prevent or even cure disease. We also encourage people to suggest collaborations regarding mental healing methods that prove psychiatry a scam and to present any new research in neuro-cognition, brain and consciousness studies. Anyone or an Org. is equal in any type of cooperation or collaboration no matter occupation, company type or establishment such as an university, college or even a kindergarden. Once you bring new ideas into this world and if you are among those who would rather emit than receive different frequencies, you are fairly welcome to share stories. Our team & those from the collaboration section are now assembling from all parts of the globe. We assist one another on questions and insights we share with the world. Note that you should not expect any funding from us as we also do not charge any of our consulting fees, for you should know that we operate beyond space, time and money. Our founding Org. is Terra Unida an Institute & Self-Publishing and as of EU and Austrian commercial law, we do not need a commercial sham and are free from taxation unless we make any profit form publications. We offer all our essays and papers to the public free of charge that is why we fulfill this criteria. All those who collaborate agree to be displayed on our webpage or are added for the reason of the same mission to uplift humanity. Nobody or no Org. appears in any order. If you wish you can submit your activity reports to appear in our news and events section. One can exit our think tank anytime.

Signed, May 1st, 2014

MSc. Andraž Pibernik, Founding President

in agreement with www.forallkind.com and E=mQ² concept,

In Tetryonic theory, the circles around Planck triangles are the region of space mapped out by light per unit of time [ie in 1 sec light radiates in 2 directions at c to form a circle with a radius of c, a circumference of pi [2c] and an area of pi[c^2].

You'll find lots of units like c^2, c^3 and c^4 within the maths of physics - only Tetryonic theory reveals what these terms really are [spatial coordinate systems based on the speed of light]

These c^2 [Euclidean], c^3 [Cartesian] and c^4 spherical coordinate systems based on the speed of light are used to geometrically differentiate planar ENERGIES from 2d mass and from 3D Matter in physics, clearing up much of the confusion of the existing mathematics.

ENERGY quanta are a Planck triangle without a circular spatial coordinate surrounding is [E]

2d MASS is Energy per light second [E/c^2], a triangle with a circle.

3D MATTER is shown as a tetrahedral form of Energy per light second squared [E/c^4]....

A more detailed explanation for those interested can be found here : - http://scienceoflife.nl/tetryonics/html/triangles_-forces-_forming_tetrahedra_-forms-.html

Tetryonics shows the charged Matter topology of all 120 elements showing their energy levels [shells], and position of all electrons [and their spin] - showing how classical Bohr information and Schrodinger numbers 'line' up.

Quantum Chemistry offers a detailed schematic for the elements with all their quantum information shown and related to the quantum Matter topologies of the elements, quantum energies, and shells. We can also use these charge Matter topologies to create a brand new periodic table which for the first time ever that actually reflects quantum reality.

Tetryonics offers much more insight into the spectral line emissions and even highlight a spectral line that has yet to be experimentally verified.

Rydberg developed a formula describing the relation between the wavelengths in spectral lines of alkali metals, in turn finding his Constant. His formula is a wavenumber equivalent re-expression of Lorentz's velocity correction formula as it applies to the quanitsed energy momentum of photo-electrons bound in atomic nuclei.

The Rydberg Constant represents the limiting value of highest wavenumber ( the inverse wavelength) of any photon that can be emitted from the hydrogen atom, or alternatively, the wavenumber of the lowest-energy photon capable of ionizing the hydrogen atom from it's ground state. The mathematical solution works, but whose physical mechanics has eluded explanation...until now.

Whereas Rydberg calculated for wavenumbers using the difference of two inverse squared KEM energies( inverse wavelengths), Tetryonics obtains the same answers geometrically using the difference of the two KEM energies, or quanta differentials.

Technology that is seeking to understand spooky action at a distance and entanglement need to be aware of a few things. Action at a distance has been a source of mystery since it was first proposed by Newton as the basis for Gravitational attraction, and can be explained with Teslian Longitudinal waves. These differ from the Maxwellian and Hertian waves we have utilize in science to date.

Tetryonic QED shows that where the linear energy momentum of longitudinal waves align and act in a co-linear direction, they can facilitate near instantaneous action at a distance. Once established a bi-directional Longitudinal wave acts as an 'instantaneous rigid conductor' of energy and information along their entire momenta length.

As Matter radiates longitidunal waves of energy momentum - the co-linear momentum vectors form 'rigid rods' that can facilitate the transfer of instantaneous impulses of physical force bilaterally in real time between objects of mass-Matter irrespective of time and distance between the objects.

One of the major points of disagreement between Newtonian Gravitation and General Relativity concerns Einstein's limiting of information and energy momenta propagation to the speed of lights whereas the Newtonian physics for gravity acts instantly between Matter.

Where electrostatic and/or electromagnetic fields overlap, they form fields of interaction between bodies of Matter. The 'quantum rods' of co-linear momentum in their EM fields facilitate 'FTL spooky interaction-at-a-distance' facilitating near instantaneous [real time] impulses of linear momentum to convey physical forces over vast distances, without loss, for as long as the fields exist between the objects.

http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/instantaneous-action-at-a-distance

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Tetryonics shows that the geometry is the key and the rule maker for everything in physics. Mathematics is simply pattern recognition from our scale of the universe looking down. The equilateral geometry gives us this pattern, and we reinterpret that as math. We don't always interpret the math correctly. Either through a lack of understanding of the geometry, and what is or is not possible so far as a geometric manipulation or through the sheer inaccuracies in the language that we use to describe the math symbols.

A further example of the information that's in these fields, we have an odd number of planck quanta for each quantum level so that a change between square numbers, ( just as Fermat's difference of two squares) is always an ODD number. Now you can express an odd number mathematically as (2n + 1) or (2n - 1). The question is, "What significance does this have in physics?"

The answer is that when you change between squared energy levels, particularly when looking at photo electrons jumping between quantum levels, they go between squared energy levels. What you are actually doing is accelerating or decelerating the electron itself. It's here that the English language is improperly used to describe what is happening.

Deceleration = 2n-1 series

Acceleration = 2n+1 series

Geometrically all you are doing is taking away transverse bosons.

If you are using 2n -1 you are taking way, or decreasing the energy content of the field by an odd number. It still goes from one square number to another but it has less energy in it, so the object that that field belongs to will slow down. Where you see 2n+1 you realize that you are adding energy to the field which results in an acceleration of the particle. You will find that a lot of physics books don't differentiate between this acceleration and deceleration and call both forms a form of acceleration. Deceleration become a negative acceleration, but they don't enunciate the mathematical formulation for it. They just say that it has less energy so it slows down, or a force acts upon it to slow it down.

Deceleration is a loss of transverse bosons from the field. If you were measuring a loss of 2 quantum levels, then you would have a loss of photons, because photons are dual boson pairs of Planck Quanta.

The boson is the building block of equilateral energy momenta for all physical systems. It's electromagnetic induction that adds or subtracts the energy. It couples with other bosons to create more energy in the field to accelerate. It releases bosons to reduce the energy of the field to slow things down.

Tetryonic geometry re-interprets Fermat's difference of two 'squares' to reveal the geometric truth underlying spectral transitions between atomic energy levels. ODD number boson geometries [n.hv] create 'squared' [mv^2] energy levels, and with that, a new understanding of physics is born.

Tetryonics shows us the true Planck-scale geometry of the quantum world that makes up our Universe. At first the theory was driven towards just matching existing mathematical expression in an attempt to understand what was actually happening at the quantum-scale, in turn driving our macro-scale physics. It quickly became apparent that a purely mathematical model of these interaction leaves too much room for erroneous assumptions and the entire formulation of the quantum processes turned to reflect and model the actual Planck mass-energy geometries and their interactions.

This is not to say the mathematics is completely wrong, but it does not afford us the fullest picture of the mechanics at work at this scale, and in turn has let itself be molded as much by philosophy as a true understanding of the quantum processes.

It is up to us as individuals in all our fields of endeavor to break free of the chains of education, and to use our intelligence to create a better understanding of our Universe.

Geometry rules our Universe not math.

While mathematics is the language of science it remains a language that lacks a well defined physical model on which to test it and further its many and varied solutions to quantum mechanics. It is this lack of any rigid, enforceable geometry [grammar] that has allowed the flourishing of numerous statistical and probabilistic solutions to the physical problems in turn impending our scientific advancement of quantum processes.

Remember Occam's razor and never lose sight of the beauty of the simplest explanation for complex processes.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."K.C. Abraham

The framework for the Big Bang model relies on Einstein's general relativity and on simplifying assumptions such as homogeneity and isotropy of space. The equations of classical General relativity indicate a singularity at the origin of cosmic time, and while the Big Bang model is well accepted in modern cosmology, Tetryonics provides a clear causal model for the origin of all mass-energy-Matter and fields of force in the our Universe, offering a unified, deterministic explanation of all its field interactions and ultimate energy fate.

Tetryonics relates Time to changing equilateral QAM [Planck] geometries in a dynamic evolving Universe. Moreover, general relativity must break down before the Universe reaches the Planck Temperature while Tetryonics provides a unified explanation for the mechanics of the universe.

"Let no-one ignorant of Geometry enter." -- Plato

Tetryonic Theory is a physical theory of how probabilistic distributions of 2D mass-energy momenta interacts via their charged field geometries to form 3D classical Matter and their associated fields of motion and force.

Any challenger to the accepted theories of ‘modern’ physics must by definition disagree with the accepted theories and offer alternative hypotheses with which it seeks to improve upon or replace the existing theories – this is how we advance our understanding.

Sometimes that knowledge comes in small increments or changes, at other times the changes require a profound re-interpretation and understanding of the countless observations and measurements – this was the case when quantum mechanics was born and remained the case as relativity theory strove to advance our understanding – it remains the case today as Tetryonic theory is presented to the World.

Tetryonics maps QAM as equilateral Planck geometries and reveals the change in QAM to be time. Time and the spacial dimensions it creates are mapped with radial and spherical co-ordinates.

The Atom of Matter is the individual Tetrahedrons [Standing Wave Matter Topologies] - [Tetryons]. Up-Quarks being comprised of 2 positive tetryons and 1 neutral tetryon ( +2/3 elementary charge). Down Quarks being that of 2 neutral tetryons and 1 negative tetryon ( -1/3 elementary charge).

Looking at Plato we find that the Tetrahedron is the symbol representing Fire. The Greek Tetractys was close, but the focus was upon the points themselves ( the triangular numbers 1,3,6,10 and so on), rather then the 'square' numbers of the equilateral triangles themselves. Historically, a triangular number counts quanta that can pack together to form an equilateral triangle.

1,3,6,10,15,21,28,36,45,55,...

This form of geometric counting over-complicates the simpler physical reality.

In Tetryonics the focus is placed on each equilateral triangle and the geometric relationships that come about in turn guiding the math. This is a bottom up approach, a new way to derive answers that are fully consistent with observation.

What's been missing from the Standard Model of physics today, as it's been developed, is a tangible geometry in order to further develop our math. The current math relies on Gaussian formulations, where 4[pi] geometries are assumed to be spherical - [just like planets and stars]. What Tetryonics will show and further elaborate on, is that the [pi] geometry of energy is in fact equilateral triangles. It's the tessellation or joining together of these equilateral triangles that creates the quantum mechanics that we formulate our math on. It then goes on to create all the large scale Classical interactions of Newton and gravitation.

Of note is that according to the Euler formulation concerning the platonic solids. For any convex polyhedron, the number of vertices and faces together is exactly two more than the number of edges. Symbolically V−E+F=2. For instance, a tetrahedron has four vertices, four faces, and six edges; 4-6+4=2

Mathematically speaking you can go on to show that a Sphere and a Tetrahedron are mathematically identical regarding their 4[pi] curvature. Only the geometry itself can set the human mind aright, whereas the pure mathematics alone is NOT sufficient to shed the necessary light required to see the fullest picture.

We note that equilateral triangles can be divided into rows of smaller equilateral triangles, with the top row always consisting of one small triangle and subsequent rows each having two more than the prior row. By dividing the tetrahedral faces into four rows of ETU's or equilateral Triangular Units (ETU's - Wayne Roberts definition), we can therefor understand where all the square numbers of physics come from. This is a different way to describe the square numbers that pepper all of physics...while also offering a completely new way of "Squaring the Circle."

"If Math is the language of Physics, then Geometry is the Grammar the Math must follow."KCA

Tetryonics reveals that Square Numbers are Equilateral Geometries and ever since Greek times, Square Numbers have been incorrectly identified with Square Geometries.

'Square' numbers result from the "summation of successive odd numbers." The 'square' numbers in physics are created through the tessellation of Planck Quanta.

1+3 = 4

1+3+5 = 9

1+3+5+7= 16

1+3+5+7+9= 25 and so on...

'Square' numbers do not have to be square geometries. This whole thing hearkens back to a prior time in human civilization, and I have a feeling that they were way more 'with the program' than we are today. Recovering the lost knowledge we are.

Trust me when I suggest that we are not the only ones who have recognized the significance of these triangles and how they come together. Athanasius Kircher - (1602-1680) surprisingly understood about linear momenta, it's relationship to velocity, how successive odd numbers add up to the square numbers in physics.

Wayne Roberts ( Scale Structure Theory ) calls into question our human notions of Units themselves. Roberts ETU (Equilateral Triangular Unit) in pure mathematical terms would have allowed him to develop a Tetryonics all his own had he been able to see the connections to Planck Quanta and that of Photons being comprised of 2 Dual Boson arrangements (two Planck Quanta responsible for the [f] of photons). Mainstream thought has yet to see the difference and tends to equate planck quanta [h] with Einstein's [f] of photons. The equilateral geometry reveals the underlying mechanism behind it all.

Tetryonics doesn't require Pythagorean understanding or Robert's newer extrapolation which is a compliment to Pythagoras, and is simply a special case of a cosine law; the same one used by Keplar to motivate a greater understanding of orbital mechanics.

Tetryonics shows how the Pythagorean formula is only a half truth. No doubt great strides were made with the approach, but again, it doesn't offer us the fullest picture of the physics at work.

"The Pythagorean equation is at the core of much of geometry, it links geometry with algebra, and is the foundation of trigonometry. Without it, accurate surveying, mapmaking, and navigation would be impossible, but its application to the energy-momenta geometries of Electromagnetic fields and Matter in motion in Physics is erroneous and must be corrected for science to advance."--Abraham

Now we can properly define and differentiate between mass and Matter. Something Einstein didn't care to elaborate upon. Einstein simply lumped all the energy under measurement within a stress energy tensor, and again his conclusions do not afford us the clearest picture possible.

The term 'massless' is a misnomer and should be discontinued in its use as all EM fields and Particles have EM mass [Energy quanta per second geometries]-[Other alternatives could be 2d, EM field, or Matterless].

We define EM mass as a measure of the energy density of any charged geometry. All 2d EM fields, and 3D Matter particles have ElectroMagnetic fields, inertial mass-energies and momenta resulting from their constituent equilateral Planck quanta which posses the additional physical properties of Compton Frequency and De Broglie Wavelength.

In "MYSTERIES OF THE EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE" (MOTET) by Brian J. McCartin starts early on with:

"Human beings, 'being as they be', tend to take for granted some of their greatest discoveries (witness the wheel, fire, language, music,...). In Mathematics, the once flourishing topic of Triangle Geometry has turned fallow and fallen out of vogue. A regrettable casualty of this general decline in prominence has been the Equilateral Triangle. Yet, the facts remain that Mathematics resides at the very core of human civilization, Geometry lies at the structural heart of Mathematics and the Equilateral Triangle provides one of the marble pillars of Geometry. As such, it is the express purpose of the present missive, MOTET, to salvage the serious study of the equilateral triangle from the dustbin of Mathematical History. Like its musical namesake, MOTET is polyphonic by nature and requires no accompaniment. Instead of being based upon a sacred Latin text, it rests upon a deep and abiding mathematical tradition of fascination with the equilateral triangle. The principal component voices are those of mathematical history, mathematical properties, Applied Mathematics, mathematical recreations and mathematical competitions, all above a basso ostinato of mathematical biography."

McCartin points out that, "Lepenski Vir, located on the banks of the Danube in eastern Serbia, is an important Mesolithic archeological site. The base of each of the houses is a circular sector of exactly 60◦ truncated to form a trapezoid. The associated equilateral triangle is evident...and the choice of this construction principle, as opposed to circular or rectangular, at such an early stage (“Stone Age”) of human development, is really quite remarkable!" This complex dates back to 6,500 B.C. to 5,500 B.C. and first settlements in the plateau dates back to 7,000 B.C.

The Non-Convex 8-Sided Deltahedron shape is also identified in McCartin's work. In reference to a series of extrapolations going back to Archimedes. Archimedes’ work on the semiregular solids has been lost to us and we only know of it through the later writings of Pappus.

MOTET link: http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/mysteries-of-the-equilateral-triangle

Tetryonics shows that this 8 sided Deltahedron is a representation of quark Matter topology. We have 6 types of quarks, excluding anti-Matter inverse topology. The particle zoo is the result of Tri-quark (36[pi]) mass-energy Matter Topologies. Tetryonics calls them Octahedral in that only 8 of the 12 charged facia are externally expressed.

Quarks always form symmetrical [udu] or [dud] charged Baryonic Topologies. Same charges never combine except under high energy conditions. ie. Protons are a [udu] NOT [uud] as commonly stated.

There are 216 possible Baryon Topologies, excluding anti-Matter of equal numbers, with each combination producing differing nett energy levels.

Quarks seek charge equilibrium by forming Baryonic Matter Topologies as a result of charge interactions...this is the STRONG nuclear Force.

Symmetry breaking is no longer required to explain the Matter bias of our observable region of the Universe as all Tetryons comprising Matter have opposite charge internal fascia within their charged topologies. Anti-Matter can be viewed as an inverted Matter topology (and vice-versa). Matter and Anti-Matter are opposing sides of the same Quantum 'Quoin.'

It is not yet understood why the Universe has more Matter than anti-Matter. It is generally assumed that when the Universe was young and very hot, it was in equilibrium and contained equal numbers of baryons and antibaryons. Protons should have cancelled with antiprotons, electrons with antielectrons ( positrons ), neutrons with antineutrons, and so on for all elementary particles. This would have resulted in a sea of photons in the universe with no Matter.

However, observations suggest that the Universe, including its most distant parts, is made almost entirely of normal Matter.

Tetryonics dictates that the Universe is filled with Matter - Neutroninum - AntiMatter star galaxies and their emitted light photons are identical. Tetryonics also demonstrates that the charge topologies of each Matter type prevalent in the formation of each Gallaxy determines the overall resultant EM field geometries that shapes their large-scale evolution.

The most important test which the theory of electronic configurations must meet, in order to satisfy the chemist, is that of providing an explanation for the periodic law.

It is quite obvious that any atomic theory that might be seriously proposed in the light of present factual knowledge must provide for some quantity corresponding to the atomic element number (and its associative properties): some quantity which, as Moseley says, “increases by regular steps as we pass from one element to the next."

The mathematical expressions that have been derived from the experimental work are consistent with the currently accepted theories, to be sure, but they are equally consistent with any other theory which arrives at the same numerical values, regardless of the names which such other theory may attach to the units. Accordingly, since these numerical values are all related to quantities such as the atomic number or atomic [and/or molar] weight, for which any theory must furnish an explanation, agreement with the observed mathematical relations is no problem for any theory.

Developing mathematical models by extrapolating from known answers (or values) in lieu of building upon a sound foundational postulate and seeing where it leads is one of the most serious flaws in the modern approach to physics at the quantum level.

Whilst maths is the language of science, without the correct rigid geometry to serve as its guiding grammar it produces only gibberish.

This means that when the scientific profession is faced with the difficult task of finding some other theory to replace the current theories of elemental chemical properties and their interactions, scientists can hardly be expected to welcome Tetryonics (or any new theory) against their long espoused, if erroneous views of Matter and its quantum level interactions.

Niels Bohr only added to the level of confusion that existed in Chemistry when he pointed out “that the electrons are able to occupy only certain specific orbits defined by quantum considerations, that they do not radiate while moving in these orbits, and that they possess the ability to jump from one orbit to another and, in so doing, to emit or absorb radiation with a frequency corresponding to the difference between the energy levels of the two orbits”.

Then Schrodinger added more erroneous assumptions to the modern quantum mechanical model of atoms when he told us that there really are no electrons in any specific orbit, with Heisenberg contributing by adding that there actually is no physical electron at all, only a “symbol,”. The whole Copenhagen school then goes on to insist that we cannot possibly hope to conceive of the elemental atom or any of its parts in anything but purely mathematical terms.

Chemists themselves then proceed to tell us just how many electrons there physically are in any atom and exactly how they are arranged in “shells,” etc., and proceeded on this basis to calculate the element’s chemical properties (to an accuracy of eight or nine significant figures).

This utterly ridiculous situation in which one group of physicists is defining specifically and in great detail the properties of entities which, according to an even more eminent group of physicists, have “no immediate and direct properties at all ” and do not even “exist objectively” is another example of the confusion that plagues ‘modern’ atomic theory.

Any theory of atomic structure that should be given any serious consideration at all must necessarily make some provision for a quantity corresponding to the atomic number that accounts for all the observed phenomena and provides a physical basis for doing so. The collapse of the ‘modern nuclear theory’ will make it necessary to discard all of these current interpretations and go back to the actual observed facts for a fresh start.

Tetryonic theory’s model of an elemental building block – a quantum-scale synchronous converter [Deuterium] - carries with it a “built-in” explanation of the periodicity & groupings of elements, as well as the observed quantum and chemical properties of all atoms and their bound electrons. This will permit the development of a new and entirely consistent theory of periodic chemistry directly from quantum theory itself, free of the necessary adhoc assumptions which have long been so much an integral part of ‘standard’ chemical models.

It is to be expected that the theorists working in this field will take a very dim view of this conclusion with the seemingly productive models of their (sometimes life-long) labors finally relegated to the wastebasket, but this issue must be faced nevertheless if our understanding of chemical processes is to advance further.

Even the highest degree of competence cannot derive the right answers from the wrong premises.

Tetryonic chemistry is an adjunct theory that builds on the quantum mechanical & electrodynamical foundations already provided by Tetryonic theory and develops them into a consistent explanation of the larger-scale Matter & its stored kinetic mass-energies which has been sought since the development of Chemistry as a separate physical discipline of Science itself.

Tetryonic Theory corrects the underlying false assumptions of Relativity. Photons are not 'bent' by gravity near massive objects [they are refracted by EM fields near massive objects]. The GPS system is a test of SR not GR effect on photons of EM energy momenta, and Gravitational fields are not the result of 'curved spacetime' as supposed. Only by geometrically defining and differentiating 2d mass from 3D Matter [in lieu of relativistic stress energy tensors] can science advance beyond the dogma of 19th century physics.