Technology that is seeking to understand spooky action at a distance and entanglement need to be aware of a few things. Action at a distance has been a source of mystery since it was first proposed by Newton as the basis for Gravitational attraction, and can be explained with Teslian Longitudinal waves. These differ from the Maxwellian and Hertian waves we have utilize in science to date.
Tetryonic QED shows that where the linear energy momentum of longitudinal waves align and act in a co-linear direction, they can facilitate near instantaneous action at a distance. Once established a bi-directional Longitudinal wave acts as an 'instantaneous rigid conductor' of energy and information along their entire momenta length.
As Matter radiates longitidunal waves of energy momentum - the co-linear momentum vectors form 'rigid rods' that can facilitate the transfer of instantaneous impulses of physical force bilaterally in real time between objects of mass-Matter irrespective of time and distance between the objects.
One of the major points of disagreement between Newtonian Gravitation and General Relativity concerns Einstein's limiting of information and energy momenta propagation to the speed of lights whereas the Newtonian physics for gravity acts instantly between Matter.
Where electrostatic and/or electromagnetic fields overlap, they form fields of interaction between bodies of Matter. The 'quantum rods' of co-linear momentum in their EM fields facilitate 'FTL spooky interaction-at-a-distance' facilitating near instantaneous [real time] impulses of linear momentum to convey physical forces over vast distances, without loss, for as long as the fields exist between the objects.
Tetryonics shows that the geometry is the key and the rule maker for everything in physics. Mathematics is simply pattern recognition from our scale of the universe looking down. The equilateral geometry gives us this pattern, and we reinterpret that as math. We don't always interpret the math correctly. Either through a lack of understanding of the geometry, and what is or is not possible so far as a geometric manipulation or through the sheer inaccuracies in the language that we use to describe the math symbols.
A further example of the information that's in these fields, we have an odd number of planck quanta for each quantum level so that a change between square numbers, ( just as Fermat's difference of two squares) is always an ODD number. Now you can express an odd number mathematically as (2n + 1) or (2n - 1). The question is, "What significance does this have in physics?"
The answer is that when you change between squared energy levels, particularly when looking at photo electrons jumping between quantum levels, they go between squared energy levels. What you are actually doing is accelerating or decelerating the electron itself. It's here that the English language is improperly used to describe what is happening.
Deceleration = 2n-1 series
Acceleration = 2n+1 series
Geometrically all you are doing is taking away transverse bosons.
If you are using 2n -1 you are taking way, or decreasing the energy content of the field by an odd number. It still goes from one square number to another but it has less energy in it, so the object that that field belongs to will slow down. Where you see 2n+1 you realize that you are adding energy to the field which results in an acceleration of the particle. You will find that a lot of physics books don't differentiate between this acceleration and deceleration and call both forms a form of acceleration. Deceleration become a negative acceleration, but they don't enunciate the mathematical formulation for it. They just say that it has less energy so it slows down, or a force acts upon it to slow it down.
Deceleration is a loss of transverse bosons from the field. If you were measuring a loss of 2 quantum levels, then you would have a loss of photons, because photons are dual boson pairs of Planck Quanta.
The boson is the building block of equilateral energy momenta for all physical systems. It's electromagnetic induction that adds or subtracts the energy. It couples with other bosons to create more energy in the field to accelerate. It releases bosons to reduce the energy of the field to slow things down.
Tetryonic geometry re-interprets Fermat's difference of two 'squares' to reveal the geometric truth underlying spectral transitions between atomic energy levels. ODD number boson geometries [n.hv] create 'squared' [mv^2] energy levels, and with that, a new understanding of physics is born.
Tetryonics shows us the true Planck-scale geometry of the quantum world that makes up our Universe. At first the theory was driven towards just matching existing mathematical expression in an attempt to understand what was actually happening at the quantum-scale, in turn driving our macro-scale physics. It quickly became apparent that a purely mathematical model of these interaction leaves too much room for erroneous assumptions and the entire formulation of the quantum processes turned to reflect and model the actual Planck mass-energy geometries and their interactions.
This is not to say the mathematics is completely wrong, but it does not afford us the fullest picture of the mechanics at work at this scale, and in turn has let itself be molded as much by philosophy as a true understanding of the quantum processes.
It is up to us as individuals in all our fields of endeavor to break free of the chains of education, and to use our intelligence to create a better understanding of our Universe.
Geometry rules our Universe not math.
While mathematics is the language of science it remains a language that lacks a well defined physical model on which to test it and further its many and varied solutions to quantum mechanics. It is this lack of any rigid, enforceable geometry [grammar] that has allowed the flourishing of numerous statistical and probabilistic solutions to the physical problems in turn impending our scientific advancement of quantum processes.
Remember Occam's razor and never lose sight of the beauty of the simplest explanation for complex processes.
"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."K.C. Abraham
The framework for the Big Bang model relies on Einstein's general relativity and on simplifying assumptions such as homogeneity and isotropy of space. The equations of classical General relativity indicate a singularity at the origin of cosmic time, and while the Big Bang model is well accepted in modern cosmology, Tetryonics provides a clear causal model for the origin of all mass-energy-Matter and fields of force in the our Universe, offering a unified, deterministic explanation of all its field interactions and ultimate energy fate.
Tetryonics relates Time to changing equilateral QAM [Planck] geometries in a dynamic evolving Universe. Moreover, general relativity must break down before the Universe reaches the Planck Temperature while Tetryonics provides a unified explanation for the mechanics of the universe.
"Let no-one ignorant of Geometry enter." -- Plato
Tetryonic Theory is a physical theory of how probabilistic distributions of 2D mass-energy momenta interacts via their charged field geometries to form 3D classical Matter and their associated fields of motion and force.
Any challenger to the accepted theories of ‘modern’ physics must by definition disagree with the accepted theories and offer alternative hypotheses with which it seeks to improve upon or replace the existing theories – this is how we advance our understanding.
Sometimes that knowledge comes in small increments or changes, at other times the changes require a profound re-interpretation and understanding of the countless observations and measurements – this was the case when quantum mechanics was born and remained the case as relativity theory strove to advance our understanding – it remains the case today as Tetryonic theory is presented to the World.
Tetryonics maps QAM as equilateral Planck geometries and reveals the change in QAM to be time. Time and the spacial dimensions it creates are mapped with radial and spherical co-ordinates.
The Atom of Matter is the individual Tetrahedrons [Standing Wave Matter Topologies] - [Tetryons]. Up-Quarks being comprised of 2 positive tetryons and 1 neutral tetryon ( +2/3 elementary charge). Down Quarks being that of 2 neutral tetryons and 1 negative tetryon ( -1/3 elementary charge).
Looking at Plato we find that the Tetrahedron is the symbol representing Fire. The Greek Tetractys was close, but the focus was upon the points themselves ( the triangular numbers 1,3,6,10 and so on), rather then the 'square' numbers of the equilateral triangles themselves. Historically, a triangular number counts quanta that can pack together to form an equilateral triangle.
This form of geometric counting over-complicates the simpler physical reality.
In Tetryonics the focus is placed on each equilateral triangle and the geometric relationships that come about in turn guiding the math. This is a bottom up approach, a new way to derive answers that are fully consistent with observation.
What's been missing from the Standard Model of physics today, as it's been developed, is a tangible geometry in order to further develop our math. The current math relies on Gaussian formulations, where 4[pi] geometries are assumed to be spherical - [just like planets and stars]. What Tetryonics will show and further elaborate on, is that the [pi] geometry of energy is in fact equilateral triangles. It's the tessellation or joining together of these equilateral triangles that creates the quantum mechanics that we formulate our math on. It then goes on to create all the large scale Classical interactions of Newton and gravitation.
Of note is that according to the Euler formulation concerning the platonic solids. For any convex polyhedron, the number of vertices and faces together is exactly two more than the number of edges. Symbolically V−E+F=2. For instance, a tetrahedron has four vertices, four faces, and six edges; 4-6+4=2
Mathematically speaking you can go on to show that a Sphere and a Tetrahedron are mathematically identical regarding their 4[pi] curvature. Only the geometry itself can set the human mind aright, whereas the pure mathematics alone is NOT sufficient to shed the necessary light required to see the fullest picture.
We note that equilateral triangles can be divided into rows of smaller equilateral triangles, with the top row always consisting of one small triangle and subsequent rows each having two more than the prior row. By dividing the tetrahedral faces into four rows of ETU's or equilateral Triangular Units (ETU's - Wayne Roberts definition), we can therefor understand where all the square numbers of physics come from. This is a different way to describe the square numbers that pepper all of physics...while also offering a completely new way of "Squaring the Circle."
"If Math is the language of Physics, then Geometry is the Grammar the Math must follow."KCA
Tetryonics reveals that Square Numbers are Equilateral Geometries and ever since Greek times, Square Numbers have been incorrectly identified with Square Geometries.
'Square' numbers result from the "summation of successive odd numbers." The 'square' numbers in physics are created through the tessellation of Planck Quanta.
1+3 = 4
1+3+5 = 9
1+3+5+7+9= 25 and so on...
'Square' numbers do not have to be square geometries. This whole thing hearkens back to a prior time in human civilization, and I have a feeling that they were way more 'with the program' than we are today. Recovering the lost knowledge we are.
Trust me when I suggest that we are not the only ones who have recognized the significance of these triangles and how they come together. Athanasius Kircher - (1602-1680) surprisingly understood about linear momenta, it's relationship to velocity, how successive odd numbers add up to the square numbers in physics.
Wayne Roberts ( Scale Structure Theory ) calls into question our human notions of Units themselves. Roberts ETU (Equilateral Triangular Unit) in pure mathematical terms would have allowed him to develop a Tetryonics all his own had he been able to see the connections to Planck Quanta and that of Photons being comprised of 2 Dual Boson arrangements (two Planck Quanta responsible for the [f] of photons). Mainstream thought has yet to see the difference and tends to equate planck quanta [h] with Einstein's [f] of photons. The equilateral geometry reveals the underlying mechanism behind it all.
Tetryonics doesn't require Pythagorean understanding or Robert's newer extrapolation which is a compliment to Pythagoras, and is simply a special case of a cosine law; the same one used by Keplar to motivate a greater understanding of orbital mechanics.
Tetryonics shows how the Pythagorean formula is only a half truth. No doubt great strides were made with the approach, but again, it doesn't offer us the fullest picture of the physics at work.
"The Pythagorean equation is at the core of much of geometry, it links geometry with algebra, and is the foundation of trigonometry. Without it, accurate surveying, mapmaking, and navigation would be impossible, but its application to the energy-momenta geometries of Electromagnetic fields and Matter in motion in Physics is erroneous and must be corrected for science to advance."--Abraham
Now we can properly define and differentiate between mass and Matter. Something Einstein didn't care to elaborate upon. Einstein simply lumped all the energy under measurement within a stress energy tensor, and again his conclusions do not afford us the clearest picture possible.
The term 'massless' is a misnomer and should be discontinued in its use as all EM fields and Particles have EM mass [Energy quanta per second geometries]-[Other alternatives could be 2d, EM field, or Matterless].
We define EM mass as a measure of the energy density of any charged geometry. All 2d EM fields, and 3D Matter particles have ElectroMagnetic fields, inertial mass-energies and momenta resulting from their constituent equilateral Planck quanta which posses the additional physical properties of Compton Frequency and De Broglie Wavelength.
In "MYSTERIES OF THE EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE" (MOTET) by Brian J. McCartin starts early on with:
"Human beings, 'being as they be', tend to take for granted some of their greatest discoveries (witness the wheel, fire, language, music,...). In Mathematics, the once flourishing topic of Triangle Geometry has turned fallow and fallen out of vogue. A regrettable casualty of this general decline in prominence has been the Equilateral Triangle. Yet, the facts remain that Mathematics resides at the very core of human civilization, Geometry lies at the structural heart of Mathematics and the Equilateral Triangle provides one of the marble pillars of Geometry. As such, it is the express purpose of the present missive, MOTET, to salvage the serious study of the equilateral triangle from the dustbin of Mathematical History. Like its musical namesake, MOTET is polyphonic by nature and requires no accompaniment. Instead of being based upon a sacred Latin text, it rests upon a deep and abiding mathematical tradition of fascination with the equilateral triangle. The principal component voices are those of mathematical history, mathematical properties, Applied Mathematics, mathematical recreations and mathematical competitions, all above a basso ostinato of mathematical biography."
McCartin points out that, "Lepenski Vir, located on the banks of the Danube in eastern Serbia, is an important Mesolithic archeological site. The base of each of the houses is a circular sector of exactly 60◦ truncated to form a trapezoid. The associated equilateral triangle is evident...and the choice of this construction principle, as opposed to circular or rectangular, at such an early stage (“Stone Age”) of human development, is really quite remarkable!" This complex dates back to 6,500 B.C. to 5,500 B.C. and first settlements in the plateau dates back to 7,000 B.C.
The Non-Convex 8-Sided Deltahedron shape is also identified in McCartin's work. In reference to a series of extrapolations going back to Archimedes. Archimedes’ work on the semiregular solids has been lost to us and we only know of it through the later writings of Pappus.
MOTET link: http://ForAllKind.TetryonicTheory.com/mysteries-of-the-equilateral-triangle
Tetryonics shows that this 8 sided Deltahedron is a representation of quark Matter topology. We have 6 types of quarks, excluding anti-Matter inverse topology. The particle zoo is the result of Tri-quark (36[pi]) mass-energy Matter Topologies. Tetryonics calls them Octahedral in that only 8 of the 12 charged facia are externally expressed.
Quarks always form symmetrical [udu] or [dud] charged Baryonic Topologies. Same charges never combine except under high energy conditions. ie. Protons are a [udu] NOT [uud] as commonly stated.
There are 216 possible Baryon Topologies, excluding anti-Matter of equal numbers, with each combination producing differing nett energy levels.
Quarks seek charge equilibrium by forming Baryonic Matter Topologies as a result of charge interactions...this is the STRONG nuclear Force.
Symmetry breaking is no longer required to explain the Matter bias of our observable region of the Universe as all Tetryons comprising Matter have opposite charge internal fascia within their charged topologies. Anti-Matter can be viewed as an inverted Matter topology (and vice-versa). Matter and Anti-Matter are opposing sides of the same Quantum 'Quoin.'
It is not yet understood why the Universe has more Matter than anti-Matter. It is generally assumed that when the Universe was young and very hot, it was in equilibrium and contained equal numbers of baryons and antibaryons. Protons should have cancelled with antiprotons, electrons with antielectrons ( positrons ), neutrons with antineutrons, and so on for all elementary particles. This would have resulted in a sea of photons in the universe with no Matter.
However, observations suggest that the Universe, including its most distant parts, is made almost entirely of normal Matter.
Tetryonics dictates that the Universe is filled with Matter - Neutroninum - AntiMatter star galaxies and their emitted light photons are identical. Tetryonics also demonstrates that the charge topologies of each Matter type prevalent in the formation of each Gallaxy determines the overall resultant EM field geometries that shapes their large-scale evolution.
The most important test which the theory of electronic configurations must meet, in order to satisfy the chemist, is that of providing an explanation for the periodic law.
It is quite obvious that any atomic theory that might be seriously proposed in the light of present factual knowledge must provide for some quantity corresponding to the atomic element number (and its associative properties): some quantity which, as Moseley says, “increases by regular steps as we pass from one element to the next."
The mathematical expressions that have been derived from the experimental work are consistent with the currently accepted theories, to be sure, but they are equally consistent with any other theory which arrives at the same numerical values, regardless of the names which such other theory may attach to the units. Accordingly, since these numerical values are all related to quantities such as the atomic number or atomic [and/or molar] weight, for which any theory must furnish an explanation, agreement with the observed mathematical relations is no problem for any theory.
Developing mathematical models by extrapolating from known answers (or values) in lieu of building upon a sound foundational postulate and seeing where it leads is one of the most serious flaws in the modern approach to physics at the quantum level.
Whilst maths is the language of science, without the correct rigid geometry to serve as its guiding grammar it produces only gibberish.
This means that when the scientific profession is faced with the difficult task of finding some other theory to replace the current theories of elemental chemical properties and their interactions, scientists can hardly be expected to welcome Tetryonics (or any new theory) against their long espoused, if erroneous views of Matter and its quantum level interactions.
Niels Bohr only added to the level of confusion that existed in Chemistry when he pointed out “that the electrons are able to occupy only certain specific orbits defined by quantum considerations, that they do not radiate while moving in these orbits, and that they possess the ability to jump from one orbit to another and, in so doing, to emit or absorb radiation with a frequency corresponding to the difference between the energy levels of the two orbits”.
Then Schrodinger added more erroneous assumptions to the modern quantum mechanical model of atoms when he told us that there really are no electrons in any specific orbit, with Heisenberg contributing by adding that there actually is no physical electron at all, only a “symbol,”. The whole Copenhagen school then goes on to insist that we cannot possibly hope to conceive of the elemental atom or any of its parts in anything but purely mathematical terms.
Chemists themselves then proceed to tell us just how many electrons there physically are in any atom and exactly how they are arranged in “shells,” etc., and proceeded on this basis to calculate the element’s chemical properties (to an accuracy of eight or nine significant figures).
This utterly ridiculous situation in which one group of physicists is defining specifically and in great detail the properties of entities which, according to an even more eminent group of physicists, have “no immediate and direct properties at all ” and do not even “exist objectively” is another example of the confusion that plagues ‘modern’ atomic theory.
Any theory of atomic structure that should be given any serious consideration at all must necessarily make some provision for a quantity corresponding to the atomic number that accounts for all the observed phenomena and provides a physical basis for doing so. The collapse of the ‘modern nuclear theory’ will make it necessary to discard all of these current interpretations and go back to the actual observed facts for a fresh start.
Tetryonic theory’s model of an elemental building block – a quantum-scale synchronous converter [Deuterium] - carries with it a “built-in” explanation of the periodicity & groupings of elements, as well as the observed quantum and chemical properties of all atoms and their bound electrons. This will permit the development of a new and entirely consistent theory of periodic chemistry directly from quantum theory itself, free of the necessary adhoc assumptions which have long been so much an integral part of ‘standard’ chemical models.
It is to be expected that the theorists working in this field will take a very dim view of this conclusion with the seemingly productive models of their (sometimes life-long) labors finally relegated to the wastebasket, but this issue must be faced nevertheless if our understanding of chemical processes is to advance further.
Even the highest degree of competence cannot derive the right answers from the wrong premises.
Tetryonic chemistry is an adjunct theory that builds on the quantum mechanical & electrodynamical foundations already provided by Tetryonic theory and develops them into a consistent explanation of the larger-scale Matter & its stored kinetic mass-energies which has been sought since the development of Chemistry as a separate physical discipline of Science itself.
Tetryonic Theory corrects the underlying false assumptions of Relativity. Photons are not 'bent' by gravity near massive objects [they are refracted by EM fields near massive objects]. The GPS system is a test of SR not GR effect on photons of EM energy momenta, and Gravitational fields are not the result of 'curved spacetime' as supposed. Only by geometrically defining and differentiating 2d mass from 3D Matter [in lieu of relativistic stress energy tensors] can science advance beyond the dogma of 19th century physics.